Signatures 464 total
-
451
Name: Garland Sharratt on Jan 6, 2010Comments:Flag
-
452
Name: Anonymous on Jan 9, 2010Comments:Flag
-
453
Name: Jawaid Ismail on Jan 27, 2010Comments:Flag
-
454
Name: Anonymous on Feb 27, 2010Comments:Flag
-
455
Name: Anonymous on Feb 27, 2010Comments:Flag
-
456
Name: Edward Fenwick on Feb 27, 2010Comments:Flag
-
457
Name: David Crocker on Feb 27, 2010Comments: This is a outrage. This tax law goes against all principals of of measures for equatable taxation. Shame on the Conservative government and minister Flaherty.Flag
-
458
Name: Mary Matthews on Feb 27, 2010Comments:Flag
-
459
Name: Robert F. Mayne on Mar 2, 2010Comments:Flag
-
460
Name: Mike Berezowski on Jun 11, 2010Comments:Flag
-
461
Name: Ajay Sidda on Nov 17, 2010Comments: Hi, I have been deferring stock options of over $400K since March 2000. At the time I thought I was lucky since I exercised in March 2000 and hence qualified for deferral. Most of my colleagues who exercised their stock options prior to February 27, 2000 were bankrupt in 2001. In a way I think it would have been better for me to be bankrupt in 2001, because I was young and single and did not have any property. Now with a family of 3 kids and a home I am worried sick. Thanks for all your efforts in bringing this to public attention and hoping for a quick and sensible resolution to this issue. Regards, AjayFlag
-
462
Name: Darren Croucher on May 5, 2011Comments:Flag
-
463
Name: Anonymous on Oct 3, 2011Comments: We absolutely agree with the findings of CFETFlag
-
464
Name: Mark Pallin on Oct 31, 2011Comments: Please fix this awful unfair tax.Flag