Petition to the SGEU Provincial Council

Signatures 195 total

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4 › »

1. 1
   Name: Patricia Elliott on Nov 19, 2007

   Comments: We expect better conduct from a union. Members will pay the price of this lockout.

   Flag
2. 2
   Name: Lynda Borchardt on Nov 19, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 3
   Name: Loraine Henderson on Nov 20, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 4
   Name: Janice Moore on Nov 21, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 5
   Name: Rod Tuchscherer on Nov 21, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 6
   Name: Jean Sentes on Nov 21, 2007

   Comments: I am appauled by the actions of the Provincial Council in not being able to come to an bargained collective agreement and not being creative in presenting the issues that have been presented. I believe there is no will on the Council to bargain a collective agreement. Please do what you would expect the 69 plus employers' that our Union bargains with to come to a Collective Agreement

   Flag
7. 7
   Name: Anonymous on Nov 21, 2007

   Comments: The actions of SGEU are a disgrace to the labour movement.

   Flag
8. 8
   Name: Kim Draeger on Nov 21, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 9
   Name: Debbie Lussier on Nov 21, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 10
    Name: Barb Fayant on Nov 21, 2007

    Comments: lock out is unacceptable, concession bargaining by a union er is unbelievable. We are supposed to set the standards ... we fight for fairness for all. With a Sask Party who wants to privatize public service, and make changes to the Trade Union Act, SGEU is playing into their hands. What about the members who have negotiations stalled due to SGEU management locking out CEP They are paying consequences of SGEU management's arrogance. Obviously SGEU management is focused only on SGEU management and not their employees or their members.

    Flag
11. 11
    Name: Diana Rempel on Nov 21, 2007

    Comments: It is a sad day when a union locks out union...Shame on SGEU...what a fine example you have set for other employers!

    Flag
12. 12
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 21, 2007

    Comments: It is an embaressment to have SGEU act worse then all the anti union negotiators ever have.

    Flag
13. 13
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 21, 2007

    Comments: It is an embaressment to have SGEU act worse then all the anti union negotiators ever have.

    Flag
14. 14
    Name: Devon Anderson on Nov 21, 2007

    Comments: I can't believe that a trade union would resort to these sort of anti-labour tactics.

    Flag
15. 15
    Name: Devon Anderson on Nov 21, 2007

    Comments: I can't believe that a trade union would resort to these sort of anti-labour tactics.

    Flag
16. 16
    Name: Bill Karpluk on Nov 21, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 17
    Name: Jim Holmes on Nov 21, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 18
    Name: Leigh Anne Trudeau on Nov 21, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 19
    Name: Marney Robinson on Nov 21, 2007

    Comments: Please get back to the table.

    Flag
20. 20
    Name: Kelly Harrington on Nov 21, 2007

    Comments: Please resume your discussions at the bargaining table and remove the concessions you are requiring. You will have to find a way to resolve your differences and work together with your staff. Maybe a mediator should be brought in to assist the parties in reaching an agreement. It is important to move quickly and resolve this issue as the Sask Party is planning on a December sitting of the legislature. Who knows what they have planned and it would be in everyone's best interest to have this dispute resolved. I am sure you will find a way to deal with this issue.

    Flag
21. 21
    Name: Wenda Atkinson on Nov 21, 2007

    Comments: In Solidarity

    Flag
22. 22
    Name: Hazel Whippler on Nov 21, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 23
    Name: Bruce Schneider on Nov 21, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 24
    Name: Paulette Caron on Nov 21, 2007

    Comments: I find it especially grievous when a "Union" locks out its employees! It's certainly not behavior I would expect from a Union. I urge you to get back to the bargaining table and treat your employees fairly.

    Flag
25. 25
    Name: Ann Rodgers on Nov 21, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 26
    Name: Rosaleen Quinn on Nov 21, 2007

    Comments: In 35 years as a member SGEU I never been so ashamed of our so called management team, the provincail counci. We have a tradition of leadership, a history of justice, and a memberhip who has always fought lockouts because we see them as the ultimate insult to workers. Shame on you and shame on us for allowing this to happen. Scab Mangement Rules at SGEU should be the headline in Union Matters. Or shoel it be Who Matteres and Who Cares! SGEU staff deserve better. There is no issue to great , no workers more deserving. Resolve it now if you have the any union values left! Rosaleen Quinn 787-9174

    Flag
27. 27
    Name: Sadie Chave on Nov 21, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 28
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 21, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 29
    Name: Sylvia Kuhberg on Nov 21, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 30
    Name: Dave Baldwin on Nov 21, 2007

    Comments: SGEU (my union) ought to be ashamed.

    Flag
31. 31
    Name: Dave Baldwin on Nov 21, 2007

    Comments: SGEU (my union) ought to be ashamed.

    Flag
32. 32
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 21, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 33
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 21, 2007

    Comments: as a union member I find this very stupid tactics on the part of the Officals of the Union. It does the union movement no good to see this type of action taken by the union(employer)

    Flag
34. 34
    Name: Irene Furi on Nov 21, 2007

    Comments: FAIR NEGOTATIONS ARE NEEDED IN THIS MATTER.

    Flag
35. 35
    Name: Elaine McCrorie on Nov 21, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 36
    Name: James McCrorie on Nov 21, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 37
    Name: Carolyn Bell on Nov 21, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 38
    Name: Bob Laurie on Nov 21, 2007

    Comments: Please reach a fair and honourable settlement with your staff as soon as possible.

    Flag
39. 39
    Name: Joe Furi on Nov 21, 2007

    Comments: I think the way SGEU is behaving is deplorable. Who ever heard of a union locking out it's staff Who's next - the Province One of SGEU's smaller bargaining groups Maybe SIAST SGEU has set the stage for every employer in the province to lock out rather than negotiate.

    Flag
40. 40
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 21, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 41
    Name: Wayne Fennig on Nov 21, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 42
    Name: Cindy Mattson on Nov 21, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 43
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 21, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 44
    Name: Diana Rempel on Nov 21, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 45
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 21, 2007

    Comments: One would normally believe that a union should lead by example, stand tall and be proud of the salary and benefits it provides to its employees and try to achieve this for all of its members. Not so, SGEU's elected structure has decided that if there is a benefit(s) (i.e. the sick leave bank) that someone else has and they don't (the PS/GE) have the same thing - then they should just take it away and make everything look like the PS/GE. Would the PS/GE members like to have their salaries and benefits frozen until the Community Service Sector of SGEU catches up to them I think not!!!!! The greed is coming out of the closet.

    Flag
46. 46
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 21, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
47. 47
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 21, 2007

    Comments: l

    Flag
48. 48
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 21, 2007

    Comments: l

    Flag
49. 49
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 21, 2007

    Comments: l

    Flag
50. 50
    Name: Louise Werner on Nov 21, 2007

    Comments: Let these people get back to work and give them something, after all, they helped you get what you wanted!!

    Flag

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4 › »