Signatures 1738 total
Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, ... 35 › »
-
101
Name: David McDonald on Nov 5, 2007Comments:Flag
-
102
Name: Anonymous on Nov 5, 2007Comments:Flag
-
103
Name: Maria Hofbauer on Nov 5, 2007Comments:Flag
-
104
Name: Sulyn Cedar on Nov 5, 2007Comments:Flag
-
105
Name: Lisa Leveque on Nov 5, 2007Comments: THIS HAS GOT TO STOP!!! NO URANIUM EXPLORING OR MINING, AND, NO NUKES!!Flag
-
106
Name: Jo Bali on Nov 5, 2007Comments:Flag
-
107
Name: Henry R. Schelter on Nov 5, 2007Comments: As a "cottager" on one of the beautiful lakes in Lanark, I am definitely opposed to any uranium mining in eastern Ontario.Flag
-
108
Name: Anonymous on Nov 5, 2007Comments:Flag
-
109
Name: Marilyn Thompson Carleton Place, ON K7C 3P1 on Nov 5, 2007Comments: The whole question of mineral rights needs to be addressed and rectified. But meantime, a moratorium on all uranium mining is essential.Flag
-
110
Name: Anonymous on Nov 5, 2007Comments:Flag
-
111
Name: Heidi J. Stepanek on Nov 5, 2007Comments:Flag
-
112
Name: Anonymous on Nov 5, 2007Comments: Until we have dependable monitoring we cannot allow resources to be pillaged in unsafe conditions.Flag
-
113
Name: Jim Deacove on Nov 5, 2007Comments: I am opposed to uranium mining in particular for all the obvious reasons cited in many well researched studies already done. I am opposed to mining in this province in general until the mining act is revised. A mining company, usually of foreign ownership, never mind locally owned, can come on my property without my knowledge or consent, tear the place up, leave it without any repairs or compensation for damage done, and then if something of monetary value to the company is found can proceed to mine my property at will. My property! Do you see something wrong with this picture If not, you don't deserve to hold the office you do. It is completely reckless to proceed with this outdated and bizarre mining act because there is money to be made. No other reason is ever given. No attempt is made to show how uranium mining or the destruction of private property contributes to the health and well-being of the citizenry. Sincerely, Jim DeacoveFlag
-
114
Name: Susanne Soederberg on Nov 5, 2007Comments:Flag
-
115
Name: Marcus Taylor on Nov 5, 2007Comments:Flag
-
116
Name: Kim Fisher on Nov 5, 2007Comments: Not enough has been done to encourage a reduction of enegy and resources that is necessary to save the planet.Flag
-
117
Name: Peri McQuay on Nov 5, 2007Comments: I ask that the Ontario government address this serious issue immediately. It is disgraceful that no action has been taken to date.Flag
-
118
Name: Karen Hawley on Nov 5, 2007Comments:Flag
-
119
Name: Anonymous on Nov 5, 2007Comments:Flag
-
120
Name: Dia Da Costa on Nov 5, 2007Comments:Flag
-
121
Name: Gord McDiarmid on Nov 5, 2007Comments:Flag
-
122
Name: Kevin Bowers on Nov 5, 2007Comments: Do the right thing, and protect our land!Flag
-
123
Name: Sharon Way Brackenbury on Nov 5, 2007Comments: This area is so pristine and beautiful and I think it has huge potential for environmental enjoyment rather than devastation of its watershed. We need to not be shortsighted and rethink the Mining Act and its outdated historical purpose.Flag
-
124
Name: Annie Clifford on Nov 5, 2007Comments: i really don't want a uranium mine. my family has paid taxes in north frontenac for twenty years, and we're very willing to do what a taxpayer can to help stop uranium mining in our area.Flag
-
125
Name: Ellen Fraser on Nov 5, 2007Comments:Flag
-
126
Name: Anonymous on Nov 5, 2007Comments:Flag
-
127
Name: Anne Brackenbury on Nov 5, 2007Comments:Flag
-
128
Name: Anonymous on Nov 5, 2007Comments:Flag
-
129
Name: Anonymous on Nov 5, 2007Comments: I'm from Ottawa, Ontario, CanadaFlag
-
130
Name: Deborah Wells on Nov 5, 2007Comments: In the interests of continue access to clean water, air and soil I am happy to add my name to this petition. If we are ever going to seriously explore and develop renewable energy we have to stop looking to nuclear power.Flag
-
131
Name: Andy Cockburn on Nov 5, 2007Comments:Flag
-
132
Name: Anonymous on Nov 5, 2007Comments: How can you start mining so close to densely inhabited areas This is CRIMINAL!Flag
-
133
Name: Julia Brackenbury on Nov 5, 2007Comments:Flag
-
134
Name: Cam Mather on Nov 5, 2007Comments:Flag
-
135
Name: Anonymous on Nov 5, 2007Comments: Please no uranium mining at allFlag
-
136
Name: Michelle Mather on Nov 5, 2007Comments:Flag
-
137
Name: Michelle Mather on Nov 5, 2007Comments:Flag
-
138
Name: Mary McPhee on Nov 5, 2007Comments: We must put a moratorium on uranium mining. More effort needs to be put toward renewable energies, not toward mining uranium which will lead to more serious problems with our health and the environment in the future.Flag
-
139
Name: Ruth Oppenheim on Nov 5, 2007Comments:Flag
-
140
Name: Marie Lloyd on Nov 5, 2007Comments: It is impossible to neglect research which indicates a need for us to cease the exploration and mining of uranium in Eastern Ontario. Please heed this call for an immediate end to such activity. Please reply to me, indicating your position.Flag
-
141
Name: Erin Parker on Nov 5, 2007Comments: The government must consider short and long-term effects of uranium mining. Uranium mining poisons our communities for thousands and thousands of years! Do not allow this to happen!Flag
-
142
Name: Adele Mercier on Nov 5, 2007Comments:Flag
-
143
Name: Laura Miller on Nov 5, 2007Comments: Better safe than sorry.Flag
-
144
Name: Gabrielle McIntire on Nov 5, 2007Comments:Flag
-
145
Name: Molly Wallace on Nov 5, 2007Comments:Flag
-
146
Name: Erin Way on Nov 5, 2007Comments:Flag
-
147
Name: Genevieve Dumas on Nov 5, 2007Comments:Flag
-
148
Name: Heather Farrow on Nov 5, 2007Comments:Flag
-
149
Name: Daniel Bernard on Nov 5, 2007Comments: On Behaf of my familly - Algonquin living in Ontario and QuebecFlag
-
150
Name: Garrett Plumley on Nov 5, 2007Comments:Flag