Signatures 890 total
Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, ... 18 › »
-
151
Name: Douglas Latimer on Apr 6, 2005State: CACountry: USComments:Flag
-
152
Name: Eric Wingfield on Apr 6, 2005State:Country:Comments:Flag
-
153
Name: Robin Loflin on Apr 6, 2005State:Country: USComments:Flag
-
154
Name: Claudia Whitnah on Apr 6, 2005State: CACountry: USComments:Flag
-
155
Name: Betty Leavengood on Apr 6, 2005State: WVCountry: USComments: Save Glen Canyon. We missed the opportunity once -- let's not miss it this time. Betty LeavengoodFlag
-
156
Name: Barbara Young on Apr 6, 2005State: AZCountry: USComments: Glen Canyon is one of our nation's greatest treasures. It would be criminal to cover it up again unnecessarily.Flag
-
157
Name: Megan Hooker on Apr 6, 2005State:Country:Comments:Flag
-
158
Name: Gregory Hume on Apr 6, 2005State: CACountry: USComments: i want to take my kids there this june, so please don't flood it.Flag
-
159
Name: Travis McDaniel on Apr 6, 2005State: CACountry: USComments: Don't kill the canyon again.Flag
-
160
Name: John Gustavson on Apr 6, 2005State: CACountry: USComments:Flag
-
161
Name: Ronald Parry on Apr 6, 2005State: TXCountry: USComments:Flag
-
162
Name: Dan Clemens on Apr 6, 2005State: COCountry: USComments: The steadily dropping water levels at Lake Powell reservoir on the Colorado River have unveiled spectacular features not seen in decades. Emerging cultural, biological, and scenic resources found only in Glen Canyon are now threatened to be unnecessarily flooded this spring. As it now stands, precious features such as Cathedral in the Desert, Register Rock, petroglyphs, and Fort Moqui will go right back under 25-50 feet of water during May and June -- only to be uncovered once again later this year. This fluctuation of water levels is unnecessary and destructive to emerging cultural, historical, and scenic sites in Glen Canyon. All "surplus" waters of the Colorado River can easily be stored at Lake Mead and in available upper basin reservoirs instead of in Lake Powell. As water levels at Lake Powell drop, they should not be allowed to rise and further damage fragile emerging sacred sites and resources in Glen Canyon. Please urge the Bureau of Reclamation to protect these priceless treasures by storing the "surplus" runoff this spring somewhere else. Thank you very much for your time and consideration. Please protect Glen Canyon for future generations.Flag
-
163
Name: Richard Heede on Apr 6, 2005State: COCountry: USComments:Flag
-
164
Name: Thomas Abrams on Apr 6, 2005State: AZCountry: USComments:Flag
-
165
Name: Steven Turley on Apr 6, 2005State: COCountry: USComments:Flag
-
166
Name: Doug Ross on Apr 6, 2005State: COCountry:Comments: I recently saw the Cathedral. Please avoid drowning it again this year.Flag
-
167
Name: Marianne McCloskey on Apr 6, 2005State: INCountry: USComments: Thank you for protecting a national treasure!Flag
-
168
Name: Stephen C. Jett on Apr 6, 2005State: VACountry: USComments: It is time to acknowledge that construction of Glen Canyon Dam was a horrible mistake, and to restore the canyon.Flag
-
169
Name: Harlan Blynn on Apr 6, 2005State:Country:Comments:Flag
-
170
Name: Mary Schott on Apr 6, 2005State:Country:Comments:Flag
-
171
Name: Gretchen Andrew on Apr 6, 2005State: UTCountry: USComments:Flag
-
172
Name: Michelle De Beque on Apr 6, 2005State: COCountry: USComments:Flag
-
173
Name: Soren Jespersen on Apr 6, 2005State: CACountry: USComments: The riches beneath Lake Powell are too priceless to be buried yet again by greedy water mongers. By keeping Lake Powell at a lower level than "full pool", we can ensure a valuable compromise between water hungry states and those that care for our natural national heritage.Flag
-
174
Name: Todd Runck on Apr 6, 2005State: AZCountry: USComments:Flag
-
175
Name: Kathleen Webb on Apr 6, 2005State: UTCountry: USComments: We must not reflood Glen Canyon - it would continue to jeopardize the invaluable natural and historical resources that need our protection! Please allow the water to be stored elsewhere in the Colorado basin.Flag
-
176
Name: Patricia Poirier on Apr 6, 2005State: MACountry: USComments: Several years ago I had the opportunity to see only a hint of the grandeur of Glen Canyon. It deserves to be protected and preserved.Flag
-
177
Name: Tom Fiore on Apr 6, 2005State: COCountry: USComments:Flag
-
178
Name: Donald Mazzola on Apr 6, 2005State: MTCountry: USComments: We visit the SW every year. Please consider what is at stake. The cultural and scenic resources buried by the dam are worth more than fule-consumptive, motorized recreatioanl needs.Flag
-
179
Name: Jane Jackson on Apr 6, 2005State: AZCountry: USComments: I saw Rainbow Bridge before the water ran underneath it. I've seen some of Glen Canyon in this time of low water. The treasures there must be preserved. Since it is possible to store "surplus" water other places, such as Lake Mead, we should use this option and keep Glen Canyon as it is today. Please give this situation serious consideration before this spectacular place is once again submerged.Flag
-
180
Name: Bill Reller on Apr 6, 2005State: CACountry: USComments: Please correct a mistake from 30-40 years ago.Flag
-
181
Name: Linda Liscom on Apr 6, 2005State: CACountry: USComments: I took the last float trip the Sierra Club offered in Glen Canyon before flooding. Pls bring it back.Flag
-
182
Name: David Witherspoon on Apr 6, 2005State: UTCountry: USComments:Flag
-
183
Name: Tom Wright on Apr 6, 2005State: AZCountry: USComments: The expected Spring 2005 runoff from the Upper Basin can be easily accomodated at Lake Mead, allowing the National Park Service to further evaluate the recreational, economic, cultural, and historical significance of the emerging landscapes at Glen Canyon. Please act now to utilize Colorado River water in a way that will not needlesly jeopardize these new opportunities at Glen Canyon. Thank you!Flag
-
184
Name: Dave Roberts on Apr 6, 2005State: AZCountry: USComments: Preserve Glen Canyon!Flag
-
185
Name: Elizabeth Schechter on Apr 6, 2005State: INCountry: USComments:Flag
-
186
Name: Linda Pohle on Apr 6, 2005State:Country:Comments:Flag
-
187
Name: M. Lea Rudee, PE on Apr 6, 2005State: CACountry: USComments: Lake Powell is an unusually wasteful reservoir due to seepage. The drafters of the contact stated in their discussions that the storage to smooth the flow for the Lower Basin sould be in the Lower Basin, most likely at Boulder Canyon. They were right. Make Glen Canyon Dam a flood control dam and only fill it as necessary after Mead and all the other reservoirs are full.Flag
-
188
Name: Margaret Gunderson on Apr 6, 2005State: AZCountry: USComments: It may never again be possible in my lifetime to see the unveiled sections of Glen Canyon. Please allow this grandeur to remain visible. Thank you.Flag
-
189
Name: Kate Johnson on Apr 6, 2005State:Country:Comments:Flag
-
190
Name: Paul Anderson on Apr 6, 2005State: TNCountry: USComments:Flag
-
191
Name: Ginger Harmon on Apr 6, 2005State: IDCountry:Comments:Flag
-
192
Name: Stephen Schechter on Apr 6, 2005State:Country:Comments:Flag
-
193
Name: Kenneth Betts on Apr 6, 2005State: TXCountry: USComments: Please do not allow the refilling of Lake Powell. Let the water be stored in Lake Mead. Glen Canyon contains numerous sites of cultural and geological significance that deserve to remain unflooded!Flag
-
194
Name: David Kapell on Apr 6, 2005State: NYCountry: USComments: There is plenty of room in Lake Mead for any excess Colorado River water. Nature is doing a superb job of restoring Glen Canyon to its former beauty, and there is no reason to interfere.Flag
-
195
Name: Charles Frank on Apr 6, 2005State: ILCountry: USComments:Flag
-
196
Name: Donna Riddle on Apr 6, 2005State: ORCountry: USComments: It just makes sense to fill Lake Mead first and let the treasures of Glen Canyon be enjoyed.Flag
-
197
Name: Julie Lehiy on Apr 6, 2005State:Country:Comments:Flag
-
198
Name: Kenneth Bucholz on Apr 6, 2005State: CACountry:Comments:Flag
-
199
Name: Peter Lavigne on Apr 6, 2005State: ORCountry: USComments:Flag
-
200
Name: Andrew Owen on Apr 6, 2005State:Country:Comments:Flag