FreeTheCats

Signatures 417 total

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, ... 9 › »

1. 1
   Name: Ruth Daley Slade on Nov 6, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
2. 2
   Name: Anonymous on Nov 6, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 3
   Name: Peter Slade on Nov 6, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 4
   Name: Anonymous on Nov 6, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 5
   Name: Jenny Hill on Nov 6, 2007

   Comments: My cat is an indoor cat...why should I have to put a collar on him that could hook on something and cause him harm....he's not running loose and even if he were, cats are helping to keep the rodent population down. Would you rather have a cat run thru your yard or have mice and rats in your house

   Flag
6. 6
   Name: Cliff on Nov 6, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 7
   Name: Kevin Chisholm on Nov 6, 2007

   Comments: A complete waste of time space and taxpayers money!!! Do cats REALLY cause that much of a problem

   Flag
8. 8
   Name: Jennie Graham on Nov 6, 2007

   Comments: I would rather see our tax money going into youth programs, greening programs, law enforcement, and other things that will improve our city rather than an un-enforcable cat law.

   Flag
9. 9
   Name: Lisa Card on Nov 6, 2007

   Comments: Nobody wants this stupid by-law! If my councellor voted for it I am voting for someone else next time.

   Flag
10. 10
    Name: Erin Pertus on Nov 6, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 11
    Name: Elizabeth MacDonald on Nov 6, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 12
    Name: Terry Lambert on Nov 6, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 13
    Name: Terry Lambert on Nov 6, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 14
    Name: Cheryl on Nov 6, 2007

    Comments: I don't want my tax dollars going towards this, there are much better uses such as the schools my children attend, or health care... the list could go on.

    Flag
15. 15
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 6, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 16
    Name: Elizabeth MacDonald on Nov 6, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 17
    Name: Elizabeth MacDonald on Nov 6, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 18
    Name: Tamara Doull on Nov 6, 2007

    Comments: I think this by-law is unnessary, if we are really concerend about the cat population being a disterbance then the cost to spay/neuter them should be alot less expensive by offerign a goverment rebate after the procedure. By doing this more people would have this done to there cats.

    Flag
19. 19
    Name: Cassie Kays on Nov 6, 2007

    Comments: its tupid, and its not like its going to work anyways, so its just wasted money.

    Flag
20. 20
    Name: Patti Tanner on Nov 6, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 21
    Name: Sandra Hennigar on Nov 6, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 22
    Name: Shelagh Brown on Nov 6, 2007

    Comments: Better use is improve our health care

    Flag
23. 23
    Name: Angela Jones on Nov 6, 2007

    Comments: This is not good.

    Flag
24. 24
    Name: Angela Jones on Nov 6, 2007

    Comments: This is not good.

    Flag
25. 25
    Name: Ashley Carroll on Nov 6, 2007

    Comments: I am not paying money to register a cat I've already had for over a year, who is fixed, and an indoor cat. I'm not going to be punished for being a responsible cat owner.

    Flag
26. 26
    Name: Shelley Goodson on Nov 6, 2007

    Comments: Kudos to the councillors who voted against this bylaw. Those who voted for it should be ashamed. There are individuals who hate cats who will use those HRM-issued traps and who might not bother taking the animals to the "shelter". Please apply your energy to solving the real problems this city has - they are legion - and stop these absurd attempts to micro-manage everything else. If any cats are harmed because of this, the lawsuits will be flying.

    Flag
27. 27
    Name: Kim David on Nov 6, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 28
    Name: Dean Harnish on Nov 6, 2007

    Comments: What a waste of time, how about just fining owners of cats that get out & cause havoc, my cat was never outside without me & if he got away I would've paid a small fine for the inconsiderate act on my neighbors or others. I am kinda glad my cat left this world in July 2007 cause he would not put up with it either, he was a fighter like me, standing his group (always hissing when you pissed him off) now I'm pissed so hiss on you idiots wasting the time, money & taxpayers $$ on such a menial task of animal lovers, I salute you with me finger of choice.

    Flag
29. 29
    Name: Trudy Mosher on Nov 6, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 30
    Name: Leslie on Nov 6, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
31. 31
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 6, 2007

    Comments: I think this will be money wasted that can be used better elsewhere.

    Flag
32. 32
    Name: Krista Fahie on Nov 6, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 33
    Name: Judy McDougall on Nov 6, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 34
    Name: Sandi Norman on Nov 7, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 35
    Name: ERNIE MACKINNON on Nov 7, 2007

    Comments: HRM MUST THINK IT WILL BE EASIER TO CATCH CAT OWNERS AND MAKE A FEW BUCKS SINCE OVER THE YEARS THEY HAVEN'T BEEN ABLE TO HANDLE THE DOG SITUATION........

    Flag
36. 36
    Name: ERNIE MACKINNON on Nov 7, 2007

    Comments: HRM MUST THINK IT WILL BE EASIER TO CATCH CAT OWNERS AND MAKE A FEW BUCKS SINCE OVER THE YEARS THEY HAVEN'T BEEN ABLE TO HANDLE THE DOG SITUATION........

    Flag
37. 37
    Name: Sherry Larade on Nov 7, 2007

    Comments: Please revoke this ridiculous by law. Let cats be cats and go after things for the city that people are really troubled by. Do a survey, I am sure cats won't show up on the top 3 things people would like to see their tax dollars going for.

    Flag
38. 38
    Name: Sherry Larade on Nov 7, 2007

    Comments: Please revoke this ridiculous by law. Let cats be cats and go after things for the city that people are really troubled by. Do a survey, I am sure cats won't show up on the top 3 things people would like to see their tax dollars going for.

    Flag
39. 39
    Name: Laurie Meery on Nov 7, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 40
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 7, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 41
    Name: Alisha on Nov 7, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 42
    Name: Mindy Macdonald on Nov 7, 2007

    Comments: There are much more important issues that council could use $3.5 million dollars to fix! This by-law seems to be designed to protect home-owners gardens, and has nothing to do with animal welfare, as an aside I would suggest that children/teenagers do more damage to private property, perhaps we could trap and euthanize them (Jokes, but lets be honest this by-law is ridiculous).I would propose that a trap-and-neuter program would be much more effective in controling our feral feline population, and would eventually decrease the money we spend on trapping and euthanizing strays.

    Flag
43. 43
    Name: Kathryn Greeno on Nov 7, 2007

    Comments: What a joke. Tax the cats - time would be better spend reviewing the age limit to dive, or spend more time with education. You can't drink till age 19, you can't smoke at all, but a 16 year old can get behind the wheel of a car and kill someone. How sick is that. Our Gov needs to rethink the reason why they are there in the first place. I don't think cats or pets of anykind should even be in the picture. Leave the cats alone. How about taxing the gov for the over run of RATS which are over run in the city and now moving to the country because of the new garbage laws... come on guys, tax the rats.

    Flag
44. 44
    Name: Rebecca Legere on Nov 7, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 45
    Name: Erin Rose on Nov 7, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
46. 46
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 7, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
47. 47
    Name: Heather Farrell on Nov 7, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 48
    Name: Sarah on Nov 7, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
49. 49
    Name: Erin Hamilton on Nov 7, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 50
    Name: Allison Joudrey on Nov 7, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, ... 9 › »