Respect Community Design Plans

Signatures 33 total

Page: 1

1. 1
   Name: Anonymous on Dec 3, 2008

   Comments: The City was a signifcant amount of time and money consider proposals that are signifcantly different than the plans

   Flag
2. 2
   Name: Oliver Drerup on Dec 5, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 3
   Name: Anonymous on Dec 5, 2008

   Comments: City of Ottawa: Respect the 3-storey height cap and stop catering to greedy developers. DEMALGAMATE!

   Flag
4. 4
   Name: Iola Price on Dec 5, 2008

   Comments: Once agreed to by communities, CDPs should become secondary plans under the Official Plan and modifications should not be done without full community consultation and going through the OP amendment process. communities invest a lot of time and effort to come up with CDPs and they shjould be treated more respectfully by the city and by developers. They are more than just "guidelines" to be tossed aside at the whim of someone.

   Flag
5. 5
   Name: Al Crosby on Dec 5, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 6
   Name: Patrick Couture on Dec 7, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 7
   Name: Erwin Dreessen on Dec 8, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 8
   Name: Erwin Dreessen on Dec 8, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 9
   Name: David Ellis on Dec 9, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 10
    Name: Lesley Ibberson on Dec 9, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 11
    Name: Ian Campbell on Dec 9, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 12
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 9, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 13
    Name: Sandra Thompson on Dec 9, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 14
    Name: Sol Shuster on Dec 9, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 15
    Name: Carol Gudz on Dec 9, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 16
    Name: Barbara Hope on Dec 11, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 17
    Name: Stephanie Potter on Dec 11, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 18
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 11, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 19
    Name: Ken Winges on Dec 11, 2008

    Comments: Yes ABSOLUTELY!!!!!!!

    Flag
20. 20
    Name: Jeff Fritzsche on Dec 11, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 21
    Name: Ken Young on Dec 13, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 22
    Name: Amy Kempster on Dec 13, 2008

    Comments: The Council passed this plan and therefor the staff and the Council should be consistant and turn down developments which suggest development of a type not supported by the plan. Otherwise communities will have no faith in the staff or City Council.

    Flag
23. 23
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 15, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 24
    Name: Peter Thomson on Dec 15, 2008

    Comments: More democracy is needed, not less.

    Flag
25. 25
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 15, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 26
    Name: Jennifer Hughes Doucet on Dec 15, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 27
    Name: Margery Strom on Dec 15, 2008

    Comments: Carp has a special rural flavour which will be seriously compromised by any building which could overshadow all else in the village. Please respect the village plans as they exist..

    Flag
28. 28
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 15, 2008

    Comments: I strongly support the notion, no, the requirement, that Community Design Plans be respected in development approvals. These Plans are developed as a result of a great deal of work by many dedicated people who live in the community, and have the best interests of the community at heart. Yes, this may be a matter of the heart -. something that is so important in this great country of ours.

    Flag
29. 29
    Name: Janice Tripp on Jan 20, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 30
    Name: Anonymous on May 29, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
31. 31
    Name: Robert Walters on Jun 3, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 32
    Name: Colin Young on Jun 21, 2009

    Comments: I am a resident of Carp and am opposed to this development

    Flag
33. 33
    Name: Colin Young on Jun 21, 2009

    Comments: I am a resident of Carp and am opposed to this development

    Flag

Page: 1