Signatures 863 total
Page: « ‹ 1, ... 15, 16, 17, 18
-
851
Name: Seth Spradling on Feb 1, 2009Comments:Flag
-
852
Name: Seth Spradling on Feb 1, 2009Comments:Flag
-
853
Name: Anonymous on Feb 1, 2009Comments:Flag
-
854
Name: Martin on Jun 19, 2009Comments:Flag
-
855
Name: Candace on Sep 22, 2009Comments: This film is DISCUSTING!! A outrage!!! DO NOT REMAKE THIS! I for one WOULD NOT Pay money to see it!Flag
-
856
Name: Damien on Oct 31, 2009Comments: Stop Fucking with classic movies what else could you do to improve it. People like you have already begun to Befoul films such as nightmare on elm st. get your own idea instead of trying to make money fucking up someone elses work.Flag
-
857
Name: Qpviyax on Mar 16, 2010Comments:Flag
-
858
Name: Yxyndrkntvj on Mar 16, 2010Comments:Flag
-
859
Name: Pyollgwynkh on Mar 22, 2010Comments:Flag
-
860
Name: J.Coleman Brenner on May 7, 2010Comments:Flag
-
861
Name: Tom Brimmell on Aug 17, 2010Comments: Another example of never leaving sleeping dogs lie in the "Pussywood" sense. I am sick and fucking tired of the Big Budget executives in LA LA land screwing with classics so they can put their lameass teen stars in a project that will get the post Hanna Montanna audience to pony up their allowance. Don't and I MEAN don't cluster fuck this one. I bet they don't water down their $200 a bottle single malt scotch. Why water down another masterpiece? Why...because they CAN. FIGHT THE POWER! TommBoy.Flag
-
862
Name: Adam Morgan on Jan 19, 2011Comments:Flag
-
863
Name: Buy Cheap OEM Software on Mar 8, 2012Comments: iL0F2m I truly appreciate this post. Will read on...Flag