Powered by iPetitions - Start your online petition now

Signatures 141 total

Page: 1, 2, 3

  1. 1
    Name: Cheryl Lynne Bradley on Nov 4, 2004
    Comments: I want equal rights for smokers and the end of the social exclusion of smokers.
    State:
    Country: CA
    Flag
  2. 2
    Name: Maurice Bertouille on Nov 4, 2004
    Comments: Our country is becoming a dictatorship. Surely there must be answers to satisfy all concerned. I believe that if Governments at all levels are promoting morals, then liquor,gambling,junk food must be eliminated as well.These are all health related as well. Job related illnesses, simply ban the country ha!
    State:
    Country: CA
    Flag
  3. 3
    Name: Vincent Taylor on Nov 4, 2004
    Comments:
    State:
    Country: CA
    Flag
  4. 4
    Name: Mike Cabras on Nov 4, 2004
    Comments:
    State:
    Country: CA
    Flag
  5. 5
    Name: Frank Zaniol on Nov 4, 2004
    Comments: Ottawa is spending 480 million, Ontario another 90 million per year on anti-tobacco. Follow the money.
    State:
    Country: CA
    Flag
  6. 6
    Name: Ann Welch on Nov 4, 2004
    Comments:
    State:
    Country: CA
    Flag
  7. 7
    Name: Nick Melnyk on Nov 4, 2004
    Comments: SVE DSRs are the only reasonable and sensible solutions for all concerned. The primary reason against SVE DSRs is that if they were allowed, the "gold standard" total ban concept could not take place. This frustrates the ban industry to no end since the argument "I should not have to breathe in your smoke" would effectively be rendered meaningless. There is room for justifiable compromise, all that is lacking is an unencumbered will for fairness and equality.
    State:
    Country: CA
    Flag
  8. 8
    Name: Rob Guild on Nov 5, 2004
    Comments:
    State:
    Country: CA
    Flag
  9. 9
    Name: Andrea Scala on Nov 5, 2004
    Comments: I want the same rights and freedoms as non smokers
    State:
    Country: CA
    Flag
  10. 10
    Name: Jan Hogg on Nov 5, 2004
    Comments:
    State:
    Country: CA
    Flag
  11. 11
    Name: Hugh Grant on Nov 5, 2004
    Comments: I do not smoke, but the actions of the Government infringe on an individual's rights and freedom. (the site shows US states...not Canadian Provinces)
    State:
    Country: CA
    Flag
  12. 12
    Name: Wilma MacDonald on Nov 5, 2004
    Comments: I am a non-smoker who objects strenuously to the discrimination being condoned by government in the matter of banning smoking. There is no "Province" above, only "State". Thank you.
    State:
    Country: CA
    Flag
  13. 13
    Name: Thomas Laprade on Nov 5, 2004
    Comments: The next big issue in Ontario politics will be 'nannygate'--a charge the Liberal government is intent on running residents' lives from the cradle to the grave. Premier Dalton McGuinty's government is the most interventionist of recent times, although many will defend its intrusions as in the public interest(for the greater good) It is telling children what to eat(taking junk foods out of schools) how and when to exercise. (20 minutes exercise each day), tried to freeze raw fish, telling residents what dogs they can own The Liberals are aiming to ban smoking eventually in almost all indoor public and work places. We do not elect people so they can control and manipulate our bahavior. They are in office to serve us, not visa versa. Thomas Laprade Thunder Bay, Ont. Ph. 807 3457258
    State:
    Country: CA
    Flag
  14. 14
    Name: Debbie Leavitt on Nov 5, 2004
    Comments: I believe that the government is trying to turn us into a communist country, It's cigarettes and pitbulls this year, WHAT WILL IT BE NEXT YEAR
    State:
    Country: CA
    Flag
  15. 15
    Name: Steve Hartwell on Nov 5, 2004
    Comments: Ban the BAN Industry before it Bans us all. steve hartwell www.smokersrightscanada.org
    State:
    Country: CA
    Flag
  16. 16
    Name: Fred Quarrie on Nov 5, 2004
    Comments: any other group of people, wether religious, physically impaired or addicted to a substance like alcohol etc. would be bringing hate crime charges against anyone making the kind of statements that are made against smokers.
    State:
    Country: CA
    Flag
  17. 17
    Name: Roland Legacy on Nov 6, 2004
    Comments: Just went out for the first time since the province wide ban took effect, and felt extremely out of place.....welcome to Canada!
    State:
    Country: CA
    Flag
  18. 18
    Name: Clem Gagnon on Nov 7, 2004
    Comments: For Now that is my e-mail but it change to clemthepest@angmax.com I will make sure you it right. I don't smoke anymore and from Ontario my M.P.P. is Tim Hudack the health Minister I don't know sorry. Clem
    State:
    Country: CA
    Flag
  19. 19
    Name: E Boyd on Nov 8, 2004
    Comments:
    State:
    Country:
    Flag
  20. 20
    Name: Carolyn Vaughan on Nov 8, 2004
    Comments: Canada "denormalizes" a particular segment of the population Shame on You.
    State:
    Country: CA
    Flag
  21. 21
    Name: Warren Klass on Nov 8, 2004
    Comments: Thank God Bush was re-elected.I hope he stops this nonsense and sends these anti-smoking nuts a real good message.
    State:
    Country: CA
    Flag
  22. 22
    Name: John Stewart on Nov 8, 2004
    Comments:
    State:
    Country: CA
    Flag
  23. 23
    Name: Cathy McPherson on Nov 8, 2004
    Comments: I'm sick, sore and tired of being pushed around and just taking it.Smoking is legal yet we are being treated worse than 2nd class citizens. Had enough. I am in B.C. - Your petition does not allow us to pick our province, only American states...Thought this was strictly for Canadians Thanks!
    State:
    Country: CA
    Flag
  24. 24
    Name: Garnet Dawn on Nov 8, 2004
    Comments:
    State: IL
    Country: US
    Flag
  25. 25
    Name: Osama Bin Laden on Nov 9, 2004
    Comments: All infidels should smoke three packs a day.
    State:
    Country: AF
    Flag
  26. 26
    Name: Steve Kelly on Nov 9, 2004
    Comments: Prudent health advice is one thing. Anti-smoking has become a monstrous thing. A wrongheaded, hysterical hate campaign, is supremely unhealthy. Enough! Stop this! Turn it back.
    State: MA
    Country: US
    Flag
  27. 27
    Name: Gordon Finlay on Nov 9, 2004
    Comments: A smoker for 50 years & healthy.
    State:
    Country: CA
    Flag
  28. 28
    Name: John Smith on Nov 9, 2004
    Comments:
    State:
    Country:
    Flag
  29. 29
    Name: Ken Bland on Nov 10, 2004
    Comments:
    State:
    Country:
    Flag
  30. 30
    Name: Eileen Hutcheson on Nov 13, 2004
    Comments:
    State:
    Country: CA
    Flag
  31. 31
    Name: Dianne Murphy on Nov 14, 2004
    Comments:
    State: OH
    Country: CA
    Flag
  32. 32
    Name: Jo-Ann Malko on Nov 15, 2004
    Comments:
    State:
    Country: CA
    Flag
  33. 33
    Name: D B on Nov 15, 2004
    Comments:
    State:
    Country: CA
    Flag
  34. 34
    Name: Clermont "Clem" Gagnon on Nov 20, 2004
    Comments: NO ROOM FOR ANY HATE CRIMES OF ANY KIND. IF FOUND GUILTY SENTENCED TO AT LEAST 10 TO 25 YEARS tHANK YOU Clem
    State:
    Country: CA
    Flag
  35. 35
    Name: Nick Melnyk on Nov 20, 2004
    Comments: Second Hand Smoke(SHS) is a deliberately manufactured fraud with the major aim of MONEY for those involved in the fraudulent scheme.
    State:
    Country: CA
    Flag
  36. 36
    Name: Michelle Gervais on Nov 20, 2004
    Comments: I smoke and I vote!
    State:
    Country: CA
    Flag
  37. 37
    Name: Derek Cale on Nov 22, 2004
    Comments: i want to have the right to open a bar that allows smokers. it should be my right.
    State:
    Country: CA
    Flag
  38. 38
    Name: Charles McArthur on Nov 22, 2004
    Comments:
    State:
    Country: CA
    Flag
  39. 39
    Name: Lynda Duguay on Nov 22, 2004
    Comments:
    State:
    Country:
    Flag
  40. 40
    Name: Rick Stagg on Nov 23, 2004
    Comments:
    State:
    Country: CA
    Flag
  41. 41
    Name: Sheila Fifi on Nov 27, 2004
    Comments: We have rights like anyone eles. We pay taxes and have opions to. This decision should be decided upon the business owners if they want smoking in their place or not. The government should keep their noses out of this and mind their own business.
    State:
    Country: CA
    Flag
  42. 42
    Name: John Tonks on Nov 28, 2004
    Comments:
    State:
    Country: CA
    Flag
  43. 43
    Name: Gerry Amyotte on Nov 28, 2004
    Comments: If at any time you need to contact me please do for i enjoy my smoke.And iwant to help get our smoking right back
    State:
    Country: CA
    Flag
  44. 44
    Name: Gary Bruce on Nov 29, 2004
    Comments:
    State:
    Country:
    Flag
  45. 45
    Name: Wendy Hobsbawn on Dec 1, 2004
    Comments: Smoking is far less harmful to the families of smokers than the repercussions of a family member with alcohol addiction. Spend resources where required rather than antagonizing a relatively quiet group (Smokers).
    State:
    Country: CA
    Flag
  46. 46
    Name: Harold Brash on Dec 1, 2004
    Comments:
    State:
    Country:
    Flag
  47. 47
    Name: W. Andrews on Dec 2, 2004
    Comments: The choice should be with the business owner if they want to go smoke-free.
    State:
    Country: CA
    Flag
  48. 48
    Name: Niki Kanavas on Dec 4, 2004
    Comments:
    State:
    Country: CA
    Flag
  49. 49
    Name: Paolo DiPede on Dec 5, 2004
    Comments: I'm a small business owner that has been negativly affected by the ban
    State:
    Country: CA
    Flag
  50. 50
    Name: ANTHONY PISTILLO on Dec 6, 2004
    Comments:
    State:
    Country: CA
    Flag

Page: 1, 2, 3

Sponsored links