Unit 2 Modification Petition

Signatures 349 total

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ... 7 › »

1. 51
   Name: Earl A. Clampett Jr. on Jan 12, 2007

   Comments: The sooner the better.

   Flag
2. 52
   Name: Mary Horst on Jan 12, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 53
   Name: William A. Snyder on Jan 12, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 54
   Name: Anonymous on Jan 12, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 55
   Name: Ann Sarli on Jan 12, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 56
   Name: Jacqueline Duncan on Jan 12, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 57
   Name: Anonymous on Jan 12, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 58
   Name: Mary L. Cote on Jan 12, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 59
   Name: Terre A. Sadosky on Jan 12, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 60
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 12, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 61
    Name: Joseph F Bewick on Jan 12, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 62
    Name: JIM HOPKINS on Jan 12, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 63
    Name: Joy Krikorian on Jan 12, 2007

    Comments: The potential for a conflict is quite real and it is an issue that we face on a daily basis.

    Flag
14. 64
    Name: BYRON BERRY on Jan 12, 2007

    Comments: THE ALJS SHOULD HAVE THEIR OWN BARGAINING UNIT

    Flag
15. 65
    Name: Roger G. Johnson on Jan 12, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 66
    Name: Sandra Hitt on Jan 12, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 67
    Name: Daniel Dobrin on Jan 12, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 68
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 12, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 69
    Name: Kymberly Pipkin on Jan 13, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 70
    Name: Charles H. Hollis on Jan 14, 2007

    Comments: I am uncertain about whether it is a benefit or a detriment to have a bargaining unit comprised exclusively of Administrative Law Judges (ALJs). However, I do think the concept is worthy of serious consideration and fuller exploration before rendering a final determination. Perhaps, there should be some evaluation of similarly situated ALJ positions in other jurisdictions, and examination of the relationship between the ALJs and agency advocates, including city, county, state and federal ALJ positions.

    Flag
21. 71
    Name: Richard Newman on Jan 15, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 72
    Name: Vivian B. Luna on Jan 16, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 73
    Name: Vivian B. Luna on Jan 16, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 74
    Name: Greg Cleveland on Jan 16, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 75
    Name: P. Michael Erwin on Jan 16, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 76
    Name: Carol Larsen on Jan 16, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 77
    Name: Nancy Kirk on Jan 16, 2007

    Comments: I have some concerns about how effective a smaller unit could be, but it is clear to me that CASE is not representing our interests.

    Flag
28. 78
    Name: Carol Agate on Jan 16, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 79
    Name: Ira Jacobowitz on Jan 16, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 80
    Name: Cynthia Thornton on Jan 16, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
31. 81
    Name: Craig Bestwick on Jan 16, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 82
    Name: Michael Jimmink on Jan 16, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 83
    Name: Joe Maguire on Jan 16, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 84
    Name: Michael Jimmink on Jan 16, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 85
    Name: Catriona Miller on Jan 16, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 86
    Name: Bryan M. Yagi on Jan 16, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 87
    Name: Kirk S. Garvin on Jan 16, 2007

    Comments: I heartily endorse this petition.

    Flag
38. 88
    Name: Daniel A. Garcia on Jan 16, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 89
    Name: Lynn E. Williams on Jan 16, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 90
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 16, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 91
    Name: Jeevan S. Ahuja on Jan 16, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 92
    Name: Oleh Saciuk, ALJII,CUIAB on Jan 16, 2007

    Comments: Our present union is dominated by attorneys who have an automatic conflict of interest with the needs of judges. Judges do not have any meaningful representation in the present union.

    Flag
43. 93
    Name: Kee Ling on Jan 16, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 94
    Name: Geraldine Darrow on Jan 16, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 95
    Name: Richard C. Armendariz on Jan 16, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
46. 96
    Name: Nancy P. Kelly on Jan 16, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
47. 97
    Name: Peter Hensley on Jan 16, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 98
    Name: Cynthia Calvert on Jan 16, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
49. 99
    Name: KRobert Hernandez on Jan 16, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 100
    Name: Peter Wercinski on Jan 16, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ... 7 › »