Signatures 947 total
Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, ... 19 › »
-
151
Name: Anonymous on Feb 25, 2007Comments: Monopoly situation bizarre. Strange billing from SMART - itemised bill with no knowledge of numbers dailled. Crossed line with people upstairs.Name of your Development: Sandford Lodge Dublin 6Flag
-
152
Name: Colin Underwood on Feb 26, 2007Comments: SkyConway have a monopoly on my apartment block. Castleforbes Square, D1. It does not give me choice and it means I have to pay for two services to get SKY for exampleName of your Development: DannigerFlag
-
153
Name: Bernard Murtagh on Feb 26, 2007Comments: Want CompetitionName of your Development: South Beacon QuarterFlag
-
154
Name: Anonymous on Feb 27, 2007Comments: Living in portmarnock in a 3 yr old development - its a total disgrace owning a home and not being allowed to avail of whichever tv service you want. Has anyone even heard of Broadworks - they are an awful analog service without sky and they are expensive. STOP construction companies signing exclusive deals with Tv companies NOW. Monopolies OUT!Name of your Development: Seabrook Manor, PortmarnockFlag
-
155
Name: Anonymous on Feb 27, 2007Comments: Another Broadwork sufferer, it really is a poor service when no other option exists.Name of your Development: Seabrook ManorFlag
-
156
Name: Helena Wilson on Feb 28, 2007Comments:Name of your Development: Park WestFlag
-
157
Name: Anonymous on Mar 6, 2007Comments:Name of your Development: Prospect hillFlag
-
158
Name: Jennifer Hughes on Mar 6, 2007Comments: Do we not pay enough for our Apartment/houses, our gas bills, our ESB, our Managemnt fee's. We should get a choice because WE OWN OUR OWN HOMES. This country is gettin worse, Corrupt! Corrupt!Corrupt! its a disgrace and they wouldn't get away with anywhere else.Name of your Development: Prospect hillFlag
-
159
Name: Anonymous on Mar 7, 2007Comments:Name of your Development: Hanover QuayFlag
-
160
Name: Panny on Mar 7, 2007Comments: there's no reason that satellite cannot be installed on roof tops in a way that they cannot be seen. Not being able to use Sky HD is leaving us in the dark ages.Name of your Development: Hanover QuayFlag
-
161
Name: Anonymous on Mar 7, 2007Comments:Name of your Development: Mayeston hallFlag
-
162
Name: Anonymous on Mar 8, 2007Comments:Name of your Development: St. Raphaels Manor Celbridge Co KildareFlag
-
163
Name: Anonymous on Mar 8, 2007Comments: We shouldn't allow monopolies to take decisions for us!Name of your Development: Prospect Hill Finglas Rd. D 11Flag
-
164
Name: Anonymous on Mar 9, 2007Comments: terrible service from broadworksName of your Development: waterside swords rdFlag
-
165
Name: Anonymous on Mar 10, 2007Comments: Cablewatch have been out in our property and cannot get a service off them at all. Have left 6 messages for them to contact me and still no contact.Name of your Development: BallymoreFlag
-
166
Name: Anonymous on Mar 12, 2007Comments: I think it is ridiculous developers deciding what tv company, broadband service can be used soley in a development. Oviously the developers are getting a backhander otherwise why would they be so keen to use one company over anotherName of your Development: AdamstownFlag
-
167
Name: Melissa on Mar 12, 2007Comments: i think that there should be a choice for consumersName of your Development: park west pointeFlag
-
168
Name: Sheila on Mar 13, 2007Comments:Name of your Development: CarrigmoreFlag
-
169
Name: Breda Walsh on Mar 13, 2007Comments: what an xlnt ideaName of your Development: Gallery Quay Grand Canal DockFlag
-
170
Name: Danny Tangney on Mar 13, 2007Comments: I think its ridiculous that developers are allowed to get away with this anti-competitive practice. The service suppiled by these companies is invariably inferior to that provided by companies who invested many years and substantial amounts of money into providing quality products backed up by good customer care. Who wants a service from a company whose sole aim is to take as much money from you as they can while in return providing you with a mediocre service which has terrible / non-existant customer careName of your Development: Roseberry HillFlag
-
171
Name: Marina Brady on Mar 15, 2007Comments:Name of your Development: mayeston hallFlag
-
172
Name: Anonymous on Mar 15, 2007Comments:Name of your Development: CarringtonFlag
-
173
Name: Anonymous on Mar 15, 2007Comments:Name of your Development: PARKVIEW STEPASIDE CO. DUBLINFlag
-
174
Name: Alan Lawless on Mar 16, 2007Comments:Name of your Development: Holywell, Swords Co DublinFlag
-
175
Name: Anonymous on Mar 19, 2007Comments:Name of your Development: Royal Canal Park, Dublin 15Flag
-
176
Name: C X on Mar 19, 2007Comments:Name of your Development: HOLYWELLFlag
-
177
Name: David Hodson on Mar 20, 2007Comments:Name of your Development: The Coast, BaldoyleFlag
-
178
Name: Gavin Osborne on Mar 21, 2007Comments: Why do the residents here at Earlswood have to put up with a substandard service (Smart Telecom) and no choice but to put up with it It's a disgrace that people must suffer due to greed and kickbacks between developers and service providersName of your Development: Earlswood, Ashtown, D15Flag
-
179
Name: Anonymous on Mar 23, 2007Comments:Name of your Development: Royal Canal Park Ratoath Rd Dublin 15Flag
-
180
Name: Anonymous on Mar 23, 2007Comments:Name of your Development: Waterside swords rd, MalahideFlag
-
181
Name: Anonymous on Mar 26, 2007Comments: People should be entitled to use whatever tv service they want. Chorus is very unstable (rubbish to be honest). People are paying enough for their properties without being dictated to by development companies over what they can or can't use.Name of your Development: Albany HomesFlag
-
182
Name: Anonymous on Mar 26, 2007Comments:Name of your Development: Gorse Hill KinsealyFlag
-
183
Name: Brian on Mar 26, 2007Comments: Its an absolute disgrace.Name of your Development: Priory Hall, DonaghmedeFlag
-
184
Name: Patricia Doran on Mar 27, 2007Comments:Name of your Development: Prospect HillFlag
-
185
Name: Jeff on Mar 27, 2007Comments:Name of your Development: huntcliff villageFlag
-
186
Name: Anonymous on Mar 28, 2007Comments:Name of your Development: Parklands, Block 5Flag
-
187
Name: Jack Gleeson on Mar 28, 2007Comments: It's only he developers who benefit from these exclusive deals.Name of your Development: Prospect HillFlag
-
188
Name: Anonymous on Mar 28, 2007Comments: As an owner I should have the choiceName of your Development: Beacon South QuarterFlag
-
189
Name: Paul Kelly on Mar 28, 2007Comments: 100% behind this petition.Name of your Development: Mayeston HallFlag
-
190
Name: Anonymous on Mar 28, 2007Comments:Name of your Development: CarrigmoreFlag
-
191
Name: Karl Mulvee on Mar 28, 2007Comments: Its a joke that NTL have a monopoly, there should be a choice of operatorsName of your Development: hanover quayFlag
-
192
Name: Anonymous on Mar 28, 2007Comments:Name of your Development: Hampton WoodFlag
-
193
Name: Michael Murphy on Mar 28, 2007Comments:Name of your Development: Longboat Quay NorthFlag
-
194
Name: Mary Kenny on Mar 28, 2007Comments:Name of your Development: Forbes QuayFlag
-
195
Name: Damien Gill on Mar 28, 2007Comments:Name of your Development: CitysideFlag
-
196
Name: Anonymous on Mar 28, 2007Comments: disgracefullName of your Development: cityside,meakstownFlag
-
197
Name: Cathal O'Loughlin on Mar 28, 2007Comments: Grrrr I hate broadworks, relaying channels from a dish on the roof and charging extortionate prices for Channels that are free with a FTA card should be illeagle :(Name of your Development: MAYESTON HALL BARINA CONSTRUCTION - SLY Ba5tards BROADWORKS - THEIVESFlag
-
198
Name: Anonymous on Mar 29, 2007Comments: Is does not affect my property but does my two sisters. It is stupid that you have to go with one provider, and this goes for all services and not just for TV.Name of your Development: Hampton WoodFlag
-
199
Name: Enda Minogue on Mar 29, 2007Comments:Name of your Development: The Coast, BaldoyleFlag
-
200
Name: Caitriona Myers on Mar 29, 2007Comments:Name of your Development: The Coast Baldoyle Dublin 13Flag