Powered by iPetitions - Start your online petition now

Signatures 944 total

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, ... 19 »

  1. 1
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 9, 2007
    Comments: This must be stopped. Hope everyone signs the petition
    Name of your Development:
    Flag
  2. 2
    Name: Krishna on Jan 9, 2007
    Comments: hi iam currently living in rathborne in ashtown where we are tied to cablewatch ( oh ya there is a company like that) the crapiest cable company you can get in ireland!!!! unfortunately. we want to see atleast ntl or sky in there thanks kc
    Name of your Development:
    Flag
  3. 3
    Name: Claire McSweeney on Jan 9, 2007
    Comments:
    Name of your Development:
    Flag
  4. 4
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 9, 2007
    Comments:
    Name of your Development:
    Flag
  5. 5
    Name: Declan O'Neill on Jan 10, 2007
    Comments:
    Name of your Development:
    Flag
  6. 6
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 10, 2007
    Comments:
    Name of your Development:
    Flag
  7. 7
    Name: Ruth Fitzharris on Jan 10, 2007
    Comments: Its an absolute joke between the developers and the cable companies we are currently with SMART and the service is a nightmare and the choice of stations is no better
    Name of your Development:
    Flag
  8. 8
    Name: G Lennox on Jan 10, 2007
    Comments: It is deplorable that we are held at randsom to a company that provide awful customer service, little choice and dreadful TV all at expensive prices It is ludicrous and in a hearbeat I would change
    Name of your Development:
    Flag
  9. 9
    Name: David on Jan 10, 2007
    Comments: Want more choice because the service provided by Smart is crap and very expensive
    Name of your Development:
    Flag
  10. 10
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 10, 2007
    Comments:
    Name of your Development:
    Flag
  11. 11
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 10, 2007
    Comments: Smart Telecom are a complete joke...strongly advise anyone not to sign up to them if at all possible! Pathetic customer service and sh*te packages...........
    Name of your Development:
    Flag
  12. 12
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 10, 2007
    Comments: Should not be allowed.
    Name of your Development:
    Flag
  13. 13
    Name: Brian O'Sullivan on Jan 10, 2007
    Comments:
    Name of your Development:
    Flag
  14. 14
    Name: Suzanne Ryan on Jan 10, 2007
    Comments: People should be in TOTAL control over what cable company to use for their OWN homes!! Developers should keep their noses out of IT!!!!
    Name of your Development:
    Flag
  15. 15
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 10, 2007
    Comments: People should be in TOTAL control over what cable company to use for their OWN homes!! Developers should keep their noses out of IT!!!!
    Name of your Development:
    Flag
  16. 16
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 10, 2007
    Comments: People should be in TOTAL control over what cable company to use for their OWN homes!! Developers should keep their noses out of IT!!!!
    Name of your Development:
    Flag
  17. 17
    Name: Louise Gibney on Jan 10, 2007
    Comments:
    Name of your Development:
    Flag
  18. 18
    Name: David Duffy on Jan 10, 2007
    Comments:
    Name of your Development:
    Flag
  19. 19
    Name: David Heraghty on Jan 10, 2007
    Comments: We have been left with a disgraceful TV service due to the developers greed.
    Name of your Development:
    Flag
  20. 20
    Name: Mick O'Meara on Jan 10, 2007
    Comments: I live in Prospect Hill in North Dublin and we were contracted into Smart by our developers
    Name of your Development:
    Flag
  21. 21
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 10, 2007
    Comments:
    Name of your Development:
    Flag
  22. 22
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 10, 2007
    Comments: I would like a choice in my home as to who i can use to get cable from - Lack of compitetion leands to lack service from the only provider
    Name of your Development:
    Flag
  23. 23
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 10, 2007
    Comments: Deals like this between providers and developers/management companies are anti-competitive and should not be allowed.
    Name of your Development:
    Flag
  24. 24
    Name: Kevin O' Halloran on Jan 10, 2007
    Comments:
    Name of your Development:
    Flag
  25. 25
    Name: Elaine Herlihy on Jan 10, 2007
    Comments: I agree totally. This is anti-competition and smells of corruption to me.
    Name of your Development:
    Flag
  26. 26
    Name: Clare on Jan 10, 2007
    Comments:
    Name of your Development:
    Flag
  27. 27
    Name: Joanie on Jan 11, 2007
    Comments:
    Name of your Development:
    Flag
  28. 28
    Name: Daire Ferguson on Jan 11, 2007
    Comments:
    Name of your Development:
    Flag
  29. 29
    Name: Michal Bolsewicz on Jan 11, 2007
    Comments:
    Name of your Development:
    Flag
  30. 30
    Name: Paul Breen on Jan 11, 2007
    Comments: Resident in new apartment and the company with the contract charge twice as much for a 1/4 of the stations
    Name of your Development:
    Flag
  31. 31
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 11, 2007
    Comments:
    Name of your Development:
    Flag
  32. 32
    Name: Ann Moran on Jan 11, 2007
    Comments:
    Name of your Development:
    Flag
  33. 33
    Name: Edward Dunne on Jan 12, 2007
    Comments: its 2007 & i cant have a sat dish.the old fashioned money grabbers who deceide this
    Name of your Development: cityside the dump
    Flag
  34. 34
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 13, 2007
    Comments:
    Name of your Development: Block c Market square Smithfield
    Flag
  35. 35
    Name: Aisling Giil on Jan 15, 2007
    Comments: Bought in a development only to hear that we are obligated to go with Broadworks- have nothing but bad things about them and am refusing to go with them but whats my alternative
    Name of your Development: Mayeston Hall
    Flag
  36. 36
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 15, 2007
    Comments: Smart Telecom are the only provider we can use
    Name of your Development: Earlswood at Rathborne Ashtown Dublin 15
    Flag
  37. 37
    Name: Robert Galvin on Jan 15, 2007
    Comments: Very unfair and i'm sure its anti competitive.
    Name of your Development: The Belfy in Citywest
    Flag
  38. 38
    Name: Yvonne Keily on Jan 15, 2007
    Comments:
    Name of your Development: Parkwest Pointe
    Flag
  39. 39
    Name: Emma Whelan on Jan 16, 2007
    Comments:
    Name of your Development: The Village, Ashtown
    Flag
  40. 40
    Name: Janice Redmond on Jan 16, 2007
    Comments: Everyone should be able to choose the supplier they require.
    Name of your Development: park west pointe
    Flag
  41. 41
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 16, 2007
    Comments: It's a disgrace that we must have SMART. It is totally overpriced and the 80 channels they give is crap.
    Name of your Development: Park West Pointe
    Flag
  42. 42
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 16, 2007
    Comments:
    Name of your Development: Hyde Court
    Flag
  43. 43
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 16, 2007
    Comments:
    Name of your Development: The Belfry
    Flag
  44. 44
    Name: Elaine Fitzsimons on Jan 16, 2007
    Comments: They also install inadequate cabling so that features like SKY Plus are not available.
    Name of your Development: Clon Brugh Aikens Village
    Flag
  45. 45
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 16, 2007
    Comments:
    Name of your Development: Hanover Quay
    Flag
  46. 46
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 17, 2007
    Comments:
    Name of your Development: Royal Canal Park
    Flag
  47. 47
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 18, 2007
    Comments: I am moving shortly into Mayeston Hall on St Margarets Road Finglas and have recently found out that we can only get TV from a company called Broadworks. In my last apartment we had no choice but to use Smart for our TV and this was a disaster. We should in this day and age have the ability to choose the provider we want for TV wtc
    Name of your Development: Mayeston Hall, St Margarets Road, Finglas, Dublin 11
    Flag
  48. 48
    Name: Stephen Whelan on Jan 18, 2007
    Comments: Agree with above petition - espcially as the standard of the service offered by Smart is quite poor.
    Name of your Development: Academy building, Park West Pointe.
    Flag
  49. 49
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 18, 2007
    Comments: Total disgrace - I refuse to sign up to our monopoly company in protest - means I am stuck with the four national channels for the last 6 months though... We demand and deserve a choice !!
    Name of your Development: Royal Canal Park
    Flag
  50. 50
    Name: Ruth Fitzharris on Jan 21, 2007
    Comments:
    Name of your Development: Park West Pointe
    Flag

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, ... 19 »

Sponsored links