Powered by iPetitions

Start your online petition now ?

Signatures 157 total

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4 »

  1. 1
    Name: John Roberts on Jan 21, 2010
    Location: Green Valley Rd., Sebastopol
    Comments: We are faced with this all along 116. Paul Hobbs now wants a winery just above Pitkin Marsh. He has already caused John Jenkel to be jailed through his disregard for his original agreement with Jenkel. It is time to put some reins on the county and realize that we have enough vineyards. Hobbs is also the force behind the first project subject to the "Timberland Conversion Ordinance" that will come before the county. The next one following is Preservation Ranch. How do you destroy a watershed? Start at the top and clearcut forests and put in vineyards. i.e. - Upper reaches of Mark West Creek along St. Helena Rd.
    Flag
  2. 2
    Name: Jean Redus on Jan 21, 2010
    Location: 7528 Leland St., Sebastopol, CA 95472
    Comments:
    Flag
  3. 3
    Name: Laurie Mason on Jan 23, 2010
    Location: Sebastopol
    Comments: I feel that the Best Family Investors' project should not be allowed to be located on an undersized parcel that is not zoned for a large commercial crush facility and store/tasting room. This would set a dangerous precedent that could impact not only those living in and around Sebastopol but other areas throughout Sonoma County
    Flag
  4. 4
    Name: Rae Wolfe on Jan 23, 2010
    Location: Sebastopol
    Comments:
    Flag
  5. 5
    Name: Matthew Morgan on Jan 23, 2010
    Location: Sebastopol
    Comments:
    Flag
  6. 6
    Name: Kerry McCauley on Jan 25, 2010
    Location: Sebastopol, CA
    Comments:
    Flag
  7. 7
    Name: Kimberly Bricker on Jan 25, 2010
    Location: Santa Rosa
    Comments:
    Flag
  8. 8
    Name: Jeffrey Kahn on Jan 25, 2010
    Location: 7847 barcaglia rd. sebastopol, ca 95472
    Comments:
    Flag
  9. 9
    Name: David Kenly on Jan 27, 2010
    Location: Jenner
    Comments: I'm signing this petition in recognition that variations to the General Plan all too often erode its intent This project appears to be such an instance. In addition, all indications are that traffic analysis for the major west county arteries of Highway 116 and Occidental Road are insufficient to the circumtances.
    Flag
  10. 10
    Name: Yvonne Carson on Jan 27, 2010
    Location: atkinson road
    Comments: I feel that zone changing should not be allowed and the structure is not an appropriate use for this property, its to large and will have a large inpact on our properties and traffic. PLEASE DONT ALLOW THIS TO RUIN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD.
    Flag
  11. 11
    Name: Eric Johnson on Jan 27, 2010
    Location: sebastopol
    Comments:
    Flag
  12. 12
    Name: Linda Heide on Jan 27, 2010
    Location: sebastopol ca
    Comments: I am opposed to this project. I feel there are many issues that are problematical. The project would adversely impact those residing near the site as well as those that regularly travel on Occidental Rd and Hwy 116. It would set a precedent for other inappropriate projects to be approved by the County.
    Flag
  13. 13
    Name: Rose Cohen on Jan 27, 2010
    Location: Barbara Dr., Sebastopol
    Comments:
    Flag
  14. 14
    Name: Alison Kerbel on Jan 27, 2010
    Location: 7601 Atkinson rd.
    Comments:
    Flag
  15. 15
    Name: Simon Kerbel on Jan 27, 2010
    Location: 7601 Atkinson rd.
    Comments:
    Flag
  16. 16
    Name: Jeremiah James on Jan 27, 2010
    Location: 7601 Atkinson rd.
    Comments:
    Flag
  17. 17
    Name: Paul Berg on Jan 27, 2010
    Location: Sebastopol
    Comments: Too big, wrong place. STOP!!!
    Flag
  18. 18
    Name: Eugene Calvi on Jan 27, 2010
    Location: 1350 Gail Lane Sebastopol CA
    Comments: The proposed facility is too large for the size of the lot. A facility of this size should require at least 15 acreas
    Flag
  19. 19
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 27, 2010
    Location: Santa Rosa, CA
    Comments:
    Flag
  20. 20
    Name: Alan Dreifuss on Jan 27, 2010
    Location: Occidental
    Comments:
    Flag
  21. 21
    Name: Sunshine Psota on Jan 27, 2010
    Location: 1340 Kelly Ave., Sebastopol, CA
    Comments:
    Flag
  22. 22
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 27, 2010
    Location: Sebastopol, CA
    Comments:
    Flag
  23. 23
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 27, 2010
    Location: Sebastopol, CA
    Comments:
    Flag
  24. 24
    Name: Kevin Russell on Jan 27, 2010
    Location: 884 Third St., SteF^, Santa Rosa, Ca. 95472
    Comments:
    Flag
  25. 25
    Name: Leila Reho on Jan 27, 2010
    Location: Sebastopol
    Comments: This project would bring unwanted traffic and noise to the neighborhood. Not to mention that the project is to big for the lot it's going to be built on.
    Flag
  26. 26
    Name: Mary Susan Sams on Jan 27, 2010
    Location: Santa Rosa CA 95404
    Comments: stop this development plan now
    Flag
  27. 27
    Name: J. Matthes on Jan 27, 2010
    Location: Wagnon Rd Sebastopol
    Comments: Making a few tax dollars while ruining the quality of life for the residents is NOT an option. Short term decisions never are as good as long term VISION. Will you kick the can down the road or make the hard decisions and support the public benefit?
    Flag
  28. 28
    Name: Laura Bohler on Jan 27, 2010
    Location: Healdsburg CA
    Comments:
    Flag
  29. 29
    Name: Andy Bunnell on Jan 27, 2010
    Location: Graton
    Comments: Please do what is right for the citizens and not the Corporation... Andy
    Flag
  30. 30
    Name: Harvey Mendelson on Jan 28, 2010
    Location: Monte Rio, CA
    Comments: This project is too big for the location, and it will bring extra traffic to an already overburdened intersection.
    Flag
  31. 31
    Name: Ruth Reynolds on Jan 28, 2010
    Location: Penngrove CA 94951
    Comments: Keep Sonoma County rural and reasonable for its citizens
    Flag
  32. 32
    Name: Paula Chiotti on Jan 28, 2010
    Location: Santa Rosa, CA
    Comments:
    Flag
  33. 33
    Name: CLIFTON BUCK-KAUFFMAN on Jan 28, 2010
    Location: 1039 Madrone Ave Cotati, CA 94931
    Comments: Crazy location for this multi-use proposal. Hard to imagine any way to rationalize these uses at this location. The relatively massive structures would be eye-sores. Production activities are disruptive and could easily impact surrounding parcels with noise, odors, traffic, pollution, and safety issues. There would be plenty of alternative options along the 116 or 12 corridors, on larger, commercially zoned parcels, I imagine.
    Flag
  34. 34
    Name: Magick Atman on Jan 28, 2010
    Location: Sebastopol
    Comments:
    Flag
  35. 35
    Name: Barbara Rosen on Jan 28, 2010
    Location: 798 Ferguson Road, Sebastopol
    Comments: I travel this thoroughfare regularly if not daily as a resident of West County. I am very concerned about the issues of traffic and water, and zoning.
    Flag
  36. 36
    Name: Dana Schneider on Jan 28, 2010
    Location: Hwy116 and Occidental Road
    Comments: I am opposed to the construction of a winery on this site. Dana Schneider
    Flag
  37. 37
    Name: Carla Boyd Terre on Jan 28, 2010
    Location: Santa Rosa
    Comments:
    Flag
  38. 38
    Name: Rick Coates on Jan 28, 2010
    Location: Cazadero
    Comments: This is yet another county development illegally partitioned into smaller projects to avoid analysis of negative cumulative impacts as required by the California Environmental Quality Act.
    Flag
  39. 39
    Name: Alyson Filippa on Jan 29, 2010
    Location: sebastopol
    Comments: no on the winery on hwy 116 in sebastopol!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Flag
  40. 40
    Name: Jessica James on Jan 30, 2010
    Location: 7601 Atkinson Rd Sebastopol CA 95472
    Comments:
    Flag
  41. 41
    Name: Lily on Jan 30, 2010
    Location: Sebastopol
    Comments: This is a huge project on an undersized site. It just doesn't fit here.
    Flag
  42. 42
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 31, 2010
    Location: Sebastopol, Ca
    Comments: Squeezing this project onto this site is like pounding a square peg into a round hole. I say NO. PUBLIC HEARING: MARCH 2, 2010 @ 2:10 pm Board of Supervisors 575 Administration Drive Santa Rosa, California
    Flag
  43. 43
    Name: Patricia Tighe on Jan 31, 2010
    Location: West Santa Rosa
    Comments:
    Flag
  44. 44
    Name: Russell Lyon on Feb 1, 2010
    Location: 5911 lone pine rd. sebastopol ca.
    Comments:
    Flag
  45. 45
    Name: Cynthia Berman on Feb 1, 2010
    Location: guerneville
    Comments: This is beyond horrible!!! My hope would be that Efrin Carrillo, the newest 5th district supervisor, would be supporting and standing up for the West County folks, who put him into office.
    Flag
  46. 46
    Name: Deanne Thompson on Feb 2, 2010
    Location: Sebastopol
    Comments: Why is it not possible for growth projects to stay within the existing rules? There are reasons for the General Plan, planning and zoning laws and uses. Let's not go crazy with over development when we are concentrating on sustainable development and environmentally friendly uses of existing projects, businesses, etc.
    Flag
  47. 47
    Name: Jon F Sassin on Feb 3, 2010
    Location: 4769 Gravenstein Hwy N
    Comments:
    Flag
  48. 48
    Name: David M. Schneider on Feb 5, 2010
    Location: Sebastopol
    Comments:
    Flag
  49. 49
    Name: Thomas Morabito on Feb 6, 2010
    Location: sebastopol, Ca
    Comments: SQUARE PEG ROUND HOLE. IT DOES NOT BELONG. IT DOES NOT FIT. IT IS NOT WANTED. Can you say spot zoning? How about significant visual impact? More traffic anyone?
    Flag
  50. 50
    Name: Terry McNeill on Feb 8, 2010
    Location: Santa Rosa
    Comments: Leave rural Sebastopol and the orchards alone.
    Flag

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4 »

Sponsored links