West Waukesha Bypass the Bypass "No Build. Improve!" Petition

Signatures 480 total

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ... 10 › »

1. 51
   Name: Paul Shedivy on Mar 20, 2011

   Comments:

   Flag
2. 52
   Name: James C. Hoffman on Mar 20, 2011

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 53
   Name: Mark Finken on Mar 20, 2011

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 54
   Name: Mary Jo Hultman on Mar 20, 2011

   Comments: I especially agree with making bike and pedestrian traffic safer south of hwy 18 and leaving the road 2 lanes. There is no good reason to expand into wetlands, build 4 lanes, or ignore bike and pedestrian safety.

   Flag
5. 55
   Name: Sandra Villa on Mar 20, 2011

   Comments: Let's not pretend that equal consideration has been given to alternate plans.

   Flag
6. 56
   Name: Phil & Annette Juopperi on Mar 20, 2011

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 57
   Name: Margie Ahler on Mar 20, 2011

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 58
   Name: Benjamin Berg on Mar 20, 2011

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 59
   Name: Lisa Conley on Mar 20, 2011

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 60
    Name: Mary Ann Voss on Mar 20, 2011

    Comments: Stop any building on bypasses that aren't wanted or needed, a waste of money.

    Flag
11. 61
    Name: Gus Koutsouvas on Mar 20, 2011

    Comments: I do not appreciate further urban/suburban sprawl and encroachment into this area. The rural and rustic character of this area makes it a nice place to live and a massive highway project such as this only detracts from that. Thanks for your consideration. Sincerely, Gus Koutsouvas Genesee, WI

    Flag
12. 62
    Name: Angela Reifenberg on Mar 20, 2011

    Comments: Protect the Pebble Creek watershed and save the state money by not building this road.

    Flag
13. 63
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 20, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 64
    Name: Ellen Gennrich on Mar 21, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 65
    Name: Jacalyn Budelier on Mar 21, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 66
    Name: Cynthia Lepkowski on Mar 21, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 67
    Name: Jocelyn DeCloux on Mar 21, 2011

    Comments: I do not want this in my neighborhood. I moved here 6 years ago to get away from traffic and the noises a by-pass would bring. I say no to this. If this happens, I will move out of Waukesha.

    Flag
18. 68
    Name: Mary Hiebl on Mar 21, 2011

    Comments: I support a 'no build, improve' option. It is possible to achieve a smooth traffic flow with modest improvements such as left hand turn lanes, reduced speeds, stop signs or lights to control traffic flow, and following existing roadways instead of decimating, compromising, degrading wetlands, residential areas, and quality of life for residents and wildlife. Why is it that only extreme measures are considered when there are other options? Please, no build, improve' is sensible on all levels. Be reasonable and enact this option.

    Flag
19. 69
    Name: Sandra Klingensmith on Mar 21, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 70
    Name: Rhoda L Flagg on Mar 21, 2011

    Comments: Please heed the requests of myself and the other petitioners and avoid making the west side of Waukesha a concrete monument to road builders.

    Flag
21. 71
    Name: Ernabelle Madushaw on Mar 21, 2011

    Comments: Building more roads is not the answer to the air pollution problem in our country. New roads tend to eventually get more croweded and traffic problems increase. If it gets built it will be filled up with cars. Solution, don't build it in the first place. Improving the roads we have now is what is needed. The pot holes are bad. With money in short supply, this road should not be built.

    Flag
22. 72
    Name: Joe Russ on Mar 21, 2011

    Comments: With the current fiscal situation, there is no reason to build more roads that we have to maintain.

    Flag
23. 73
    Name: Jeanette Somppi on Mar 21, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 74
    Name: James Hansen on Mar 21, 2011

    Comments: Please consider the alternatives and protect the few exisiting wetlands remaining in Waukesha County.

    Flag
25. 75
    Name: Lynda And James Bodis on Mar 21, 2011

    Comments: No Build/Improve option

    Flag
26. 76
    Name: Mary Lou Findley on Mar 21, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 77
    Name: Ian Cliffe on Mar 22, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 78
    Name: Karen Cliffe on Mar 22, 2011

    Comments: The No-Build alternative truly is in the best interest of the community for the long term. The enhancements proposed in this petition more than adequately address safety concerns while protecting our environment at all levels.

    Flag
29. 79
    Name: Beth Hultman on Mar 22, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 80
    Name: Sue Saint Aubin on Mar 22, 2011

    Comments: Dividing a city is always a bad idea. The Park East freeway in Milwaukee is a classic example of how a road meant to move traffic also drastically damaged neighborhoods, income and investments. This reasonable alternative will also help an already stressed budget on all municipal levels.

    Flag
31. 81
    Name: Mark Menting on Mar 22, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 82
    Name: Susan Della on Mar 22, 2011

    Comments: I agree totally with the petition and the options listed above.

    Flag
33. 83
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 22, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 84
    Name: Duane Budelier on Mar 23, 2011

    Comments: I cannot believe that we are spending 50 million dollars in these economics times to expand a road, when our current roads are in horrific condition.

    Flag
35. 85
    Name: Francis J Owen on Mar 23, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 86
    Name: Dr. Caryl McAllister on Mar 23, 2011

    Comments: There is no need for this outdated, so-called bypass. The state is supposed to be short of money. Why waste spend tens of millions on an antiquated project that would destroy significant portions of the countryside?

    Flag
37. 87
    Name: Judy Grenz on Mar 23, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 88
    Name: Richard Kapusniak on Mar 23, 2011

    Comments: We don't have the money to spend on this highway expansion. Northview and Moreland Roads are a mess and need repaving for driver safety.

    Flag
39. 89
    Name: Lynn Preston on Mar 23, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 90
    Name: Adam Brauhn on Mar 23, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 91
    Name: Charles J. Helling on Mar 23, 2011

    Comments: Do not waste money on the bypass, just make a few changes on TT and Meadowbrook Road. Do not destroy any wetlands. Just because the plan was put on the map 50 years ago it doesn't mean that it still has to be done.

    Flag
42. 92
    Name: Renee Kapusniak on Mar 23, 2011

    Comments: Money should be spent on improving the roads we currently have first before widening HWY TT

    Flag
43. 93
    Name: Kay Bantz on Mar 23, 2011

    Comments: I fought back in the 90s to stop this project. And even more so now, money at all levels of government is extremely tight , so with all of the opposition to this non-bypass, it should be dropped or modified slightly to actually improve the envirionment as WEAL has proposed. It is my belief that, although there are claims that the bypass was on the map for many decades, it actually disappeared from one or more official land use plan map for awhile.

    Flag
44. 94
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 23, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 95
    Name: Andrew Teller on Mar 23, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
46. 96
    Name: Dennis Klemm on Mar 23, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
47. 97
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 23, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 98
    Name: Virginia Whitstone on Mar 23, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
49. 99
    Name: Peter Bantz on Mar 23, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 100
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 23, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ... 10 › »