Signatures 479 total
-
1
Name: Kristie on Feb 25, 2011Comments:Flag
-
2
Name: Anonymous on Feb 27, 2011Comments:Flag
-
3
Name: Larry Wolf on Feb 27, 2011Comments:Flag
-
4
Name: Justin Peters on Feb 27, 2011Comments:Flag
-
5
Name: Allen Stasiewski on Feb 27, 2011Comments:Flag
-
6
Name: Susan Nettesheim on Feb 27, 2011Comments:Flag
-
7
Name: Richard Nettesheim on Feb 27, 2011Comments:Flag
-
8
Name: Jennifer Wolf on Feb 27, 2011Comments:Flag
-
9
Name: Diana Felsmann on Feb 27, 2011Comments:Flag
-
10
Name: Alexis La Joie on Feb 27, 2011Comments:Flag
-
11
Name: Anonymous on Feb 27, 2011Comments:Flag
-
12
Name: James Bartz on Feb 27, 2011Comments: I support the "No Build, Improve" option regarding the Waukesha Bypass.Flag
-
13
Name: Anonymous on Feb 27, 2011Comments:Flag
-
14
Name: Mark Ford on Feb 27, 2011Comments: This plan does not 'bypass' anything. It would require so many lights its ridiculous. Improvements yes, 4 lane bypass no.Flag
-
15
Name: Kristy Spellman on Feb 27, 2011Comments:Flag
-
16
Name: Anonymous on Feb 27, 2011Comments: This bypass proposal was originally a carrot held out to the Godfrey company to keep them around...they're long gone and the bypass proposal should be long gone with them. Also, let's get anyone from Target off the panel making decisions, they're not really interested in the community.Flag
-
17
Name: Justin Jehn on Feb 27, 2011Comments: Minimize any loss of wetlands or primary environmental corridor. Improve stream crossings to minimize road runoff into streams.Flag
-
18
Name: Marilyn Ford on Feb 27, 2011Comments: Makes sense to me.Flag
-
19
Name: Katie J Kasper on Feb 27, 2011Comments:Flag
-
20
Name: Pete Brierton on Feb 27, 2011Comments: I support this ban.Flag
-
21
Name: Bruce Bell on Feb 28, 2011Comments: The "by-pass should go further west as major improvements have been made and will continue next year to Hwy 83. If improvements are to be made to TT I would like to see a bike path that connects Glacial Drumlin Trail to the path just north of Hwy 18 at Fox Run. I would also suggest that improvements to TT should include a boulevard/median design with a stop sign or round-about at every intersection from Sunset to Hwy 18,along with a reduced speed limit. This would improve safety and make it easier for people that live along the route to access TT.Flag
-
22
Name: Dylan Keller on Feb 28, 2011Comments: Stop trying to build in wetlands, its disgraceful.Flag
-
23
Name: James And Lynda Bodis on Feb 28, 2011Comments:Flag
-
24
Name: Jocelyn DeCloux on Feb 28, 2011Comments:Flag
-
25
Name: Bill & Kris Desmond on Feb 28, 2011Comments:Flag
-
26
Name: Susan Bell on Feb 28, 2011Comments: I strongly oppose any destruction to the Pebble Creek corridor for the sake of a road.Flag
-
27
Name: T Buchholtz on Feb 28, 2011Comments: The items above are all that is needed not a 4-lane mess. A by-pass for all intensive purposes normally goes around a large city at 55 or 60 mph. The current by-pass is just another road going 45. If people can't handle what is currently there, leave earlier or find a new route. Stop this continual destruction of our natural areas.Flag
-
28
Name: Ryan Fisk on Feb 28, 2011Comments:Flag
-
29
Name: Thomas Ellenson on Feb 28, 2011Comments: go for itFlag
-
30
Name: Margie Ahler on Feb 28, 2011Comments: Please..."NO Build"!!!!Flag
-
31
Name: Derrick Ahler on Feb 28, 2011Comments: iI you build a bypass,you will only attract more traffic.We moved here in Kame Terrace for the beauty and the serenity of nature,lets keep it this way!Flag
-
32
Name: Halley A Ahler on Feb 28, 2011Comments:Flag
-
33
Name: Charlene Sivyer on Feb 28, 2011Comments: These improvements are exactly what we need to improve quality of life and environmental sustainability in the Town of Waukesha.Flag
-
34
Name: Harrison Keyes on Feb 28, 2011Comments: Please consider these options. There are too many stop lights on the "bypass" to call it a "bypass". Lets improve what we have to save money in these hard economic times. Thank you for listening!!Flag
-
35
Name: Alexa Ahler on Mar 1, 2011Comments:Flag
-
36
Name: Anne Utech on Mar 1, 2011Comments:Flag
-
37
Name: Courtney Bell on Mar 1, 2011Comments: Please do not expand the highway. I grew up in that area, my parents live in that area, and I would be devastated to see it paved over. This would be terrible for all of the wildlife in the wetlands and surrounding nature as well. Waukesha does not need this. Keep our town safe and quiet and enjoyable for generations to come!Flag
-
38
Name: Jeff Yorton on Mar 2, 2011Comments:Flag
-
39
Name: Gabriele LaJoie on Mar 2, 2011Comments: Do NOT build this bypass! It is NOT needed! This is a WASTE of money and a poisonous project! How dare you propose spending money on widening a road that is already big enough but you refuse to build transit alternatives such as rail?! SHAME ON YOU!Flag
-
40
Name: William La Joie on Mar 2, 2011Comments: We do not support building the western bypass! Merrill Hills Road is wide enough and this will only make traffic worse! DO NOT BUILD THE BYPASS!Flag
-
41
Name: Nicholas La Joie on Mar 2, 2011Comments: This project was flawed from the start. The committee pushing for this bypass is run by the developers and engineers who stand to profit from its construction. The fact is that this bypass is totally and completely unnecessary. It will ruin the rural landscape and will only make development and congestion worse in the region. INVEST IN TRANSIT ALTERNATIVES SUCH AS RAIL INSTEAD!Flag
-
42
Name: Brian Baumler on Mar 3, 2011Comments: I agree that the above suggestions are all that needs to be done.Flag
-
43
Name: Terence W. Amerson on Mar 3, 2011Comments: The suggestions listed on this thoughtful petition are first rate! The EXISTING roads are in need of basic improvements, and no one would reasonably suggest otherwise. Fix and improve only on the existing footprint. That is where all discussion should be focussed. To even suggest further traversing a pristine wetland is a non starter for any forward thinking municipality. Threatening a unique neighborhood with a "rustic road", not to mention remove 250 year old trees and architecturally significant homes is just plain dumb. My last point: didn't our Governor Walker declare Wisconsin "broke"? Unless he is lying, we can't afford new, expensive and highly controversial roads. Do not bypass Waukesha.Flag
-
44
Name: Maureen German on Mar 5, 2011Comments: I support "Improve, No Build Opption"Flag
-
45
Name: Linda Franz on Mar 7, 2011Comments: Just because land is available doesn't mean it should be used.Flag
-
46
Name: Holly Bartz on Mar 9, 2011Comments:Flag
-
47
Name: Peter Rathmann on Mar 12, 2011Comments: We do not need a new road. We can't even take care of the roads we have built. Fix those!Flag
-
48
Name: Krista Nelson on Mar 19, 2011Comments: Let me know if I can help! This is wonderful!Flag
-
49
Name: David Stasiewski on Mar 19, 2011Comments: Great Petition you're a much better writer then i am.Flag
-
50
Name: Anonymous on Mar 20, 2011Comments: I agree with all the reasons stated above to NOT REBUILD but improve the existing bypass. I would think with the budget deficit that exists in our state another more practical very good plan should be inacted. We are cutting so many departments in our state government why not make IMPROVEMENTS which is a cheaper plan?? I also think the Department of Transpportation should be affected by these cuts that all state agencies are going to have to live with. A practical, wisely planed alternative plan should go forward.Flag