Beaver Valley Ski Club 2010 Vote

Signatures 16 total

Page: 1

1. 1
   Name: Brian Sloan on Feb 22, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
2. 2
   Name: Brian Sloan on Feb 22, 2007

   Comments: Let's take it one step at a time. This vote should not force directors desires with required updates. Let's re-evaluate the optional items and do what we have to do now.

   Flag
3. 3
   Name: Rob Elliott on Feb 22, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 4
   Name: Anonymous on Feb 22, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 5
   Name: David Keith on Feb 23, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 6
   Name: Steve Kerlovich on Feb 24, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 7
   Name: Anonymous on Feb 27, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 8
   Name: Jim Mercer on Feb 27, 2007

   Comments: This is once again a short term plan when we need a long term vision !!!

   Flag
9. 9
   Name: Melody Murison on Feb 27, 2007

   Comments: Although I support the Club House updates, I do not support the "band aid" solutions we are proposing. With respect to the high speed quad, it is simply not a luxury we can afford if we expect to complete other upgrades that the Club needs. We must prioritize and complete the "needs" first. "Wants" must be low priorities if we are to complete upgrades efficiently and in a cost effective manner.

   Flag
10. 10
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 27, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 11
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 27, 2007

    Comments: Why not build a two story structure for visiting teams like so many other clubs have done to get the teams out of the clubhouse. You could actually get a sit to eat at lunch this past weekend, because there were no races going on.

    Flag
12. 12
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 28, 2007

    Comments: I support maintenance facility upgrades at the top of the hill, not west of Pioneer Drive. Regarding the debt reduction .. when we reduce the debt, what measures will be put in place to prevent the board and management team from running up the debt again. If the membership votes in favour of a high-speed detachable chair, I recommend that clud evaluate the cost differences between a detachable quad and a detachable six. Capital cost should be incremental, with ongoing mainteance costs relatively close. As has become evident from the capital improvements of the past, it appears that the Board may is tracking towards a growth strategy of a senior members level of 1000, by 2020.

    Flag
13. 13
    Name: Carrie on Feb 28, 2007

    Comments: Club has excellent balance now (uphill capacity, downhill volume, club house accommodation (we will never have adequate accommodations for all occasions) (we may never have enough snow making to meet global warming) Without a sinking fund approach to meet needed replacements we will lose members if we finance replacements through assessments. We must deal with debt first.

    Flag
14. 14
    Name: Lisa Robazza on Mar 1, 2007

    Comments: There seems to be a lack of solid information regarding many of the issues. Where did the debt come from How does 3000sf of clubhouse total $800,000! And, with so many previous projects not yielding the result we were sold on at the time, how are we to trust that this "vague" plan will be successful

    Flag
15. 15
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 1, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 16
    Name: John Sheedy on Mar 4, 2007

    Comments: As I stated to one of the directors today, the board should make all members aware (1 x per year) of the expected life of each chair so that people can get a better understanding as to when these large capital items will need to be dealt with. I am FOR replacing the existing equipment with like-quality as and when needed. I understand the hutchison triple is due for replacement and if that's true, I would be FOR a FIXED grip triple ($1.5mm) or Quad ($2.0mm). I am also FOR having each member pay as part of the annual dues some amount of money representing the annual depreciated of all our equipment so that a capital fund can be established.

    Flag

Page: 1