Powered by iPetitions - Start your online petition now

Signatures 1583 total

Page: « 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, ... 32 »

  1. 101
    Name: James Law on Mar 1, 2009
    Comments: My wish is that if purchased, this block of land be managed by the Department of natural resources. I am not in favour of it being declared a wilderness area.
    Flag
  2. 102
    Name: WAYNE ROCK on Mar 1, 2009
    Comments: some ideas are being forumlated this is a time for cooperation and team work for all
    Flag
  3. 103
    Name: Mary Tibbetts on Mar 1, 2009
    Comments: save our lands!
    Flag
  4. 104
    Name: GJM on Mar 1, 2009
    Comments: SINCE IT JOINS KEDJI IT SHOULD BE PRIORITY FOR GOVERNMENT TO BUY THIS LAND
    Flag
  5. 105
    Name: Frank Reynolds on Mar 1, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  6. 106
    Name: Karen Robert on Mar 1, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  7. 107
    Name: Garry Wamboldt on Mar 1, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  8. 108
    Name: Judy Bird on Mar 1, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  9. 109
    Name: Henry Bird on Mar 1, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  10. 110
    Name: Blake Milbury on Mar 1, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  11. 111
    Name: Blake Milbury on Mar 1, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  12. 112
    Name: David Doggett on Mar 1, 2009
    Comments: NS should buy this land back to prevent any potentially damaging impact on our remaining wilderness.
    Flag
  13. 113
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 1, 2009
    Comments: This is absolutely wrong!!!!!!!!!
    Flag
  14. 114
    Name: Kay Olsen on Mar 1, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  15. 115
    Name: Jean-Douglas Comeau on Mar 1, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  16. 116
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 1, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  17. 117
    Name: Bill Olsen on Mar 1, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  18. 118
    Name: Wayne Johnstone on Mar 1, 2009
    Comments: We need to purchase this land for public use and save it from foreign ownership.
    Flag
  19. 119
    Name: Rosatta Dunphy on Mar 1, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  20. 120
    Name: Andy Leeman on Mar 1, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  21. 121
    Name: Fern Vincent on Mar 1, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  22. 122
    Name: Stephen Swan on Mar 1, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  23. 123
    Name: Leslie Robinson on Mar 1, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  24. 124
    Name: Kathleen Gidney on Mar 1, 2009
    Comments: These lands should be protected lands available for non-destructive public use.
    Flag
  25. 125
    Name: Lynn Belanger on Mar 1, 2009
    Comments: I can not believe that our government is letting this happen.
    Flag
  26. 126
    Name: Rosalind VanDerPluijm on Mar 1, 2009
    Comments: this will be a hyge mistake!
    Flag
  27. 127
    Name: Laurie Simms on Mar 1, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  28. 128
    Name: Bernie Covey on Mar 1, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  29. 129
    Name: David Henry on Mar 1, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  30. 130
    Name: Keith Oakes on Mar 1, 2009
    Comments: I will not regret one of "my" tax dollars being spent on this!
    Flag
  31. 131
    Name: James Anderson on Mar 1, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  32. 132
    Name: Janice Lombard on Mar 1, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  33. 133
    Name: Dr Randolph Bowers on Mar 1, 2009
    Comments: How an international company could own outright such a vast territory, engage in ecological genocide through clear cutting for so long, and then after making billions of dollars of profit from this exploitation, presume to sell Nova Scotia to the highest bidder, is a crime against ecology and social well being. This is a crime against humanity in the worst way. I drove through the clear cuts south of Bear River - it stretches for MILES! It is the most disgusting ecological disaster I have ever seen in Canada, especially because it was done with full conscience without regard for any other purpose than pure economic short-term gain. Selfish. Morally corrupt. And ought to be tried in the highest court, and Irving Oil should be held accountable, and they should have to GIVE the land back to the People of Nova Scotia. And this land should be put under strict environmental protection and covenant for future generations. Irving Oil should be made to pay for this regeneration of this land for the next three hundred years - just about the time it takes for a forest to grow into a fairly youthful old growth stand.
    Flag
  34. 134
    Name: James Anderson on Mar 1, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  35. 135
    Name: Doug Joudrey on Mar 1, 2009
    Comments: Am surprised the crown property was ever sold away to private interests, like Irving.
    Flag
  36. 136
    Name: Michael McFadden on Mar 1, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  37. 137
    Name: Doug Mullane on Mar 1, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  38. 138
    Name: Annette & Gary Mader on Mar 1, 2009
    Comments: I would like to know how Bowaters originaly aquired this land and how much Irving paid Bowaters for this land.
    Flag
  39. 139
    Name: Noreen Miller on Mar 1, 2009
    Comments: This is totally unacceptable, the province had absolutely no plan to make this sale public and Irving only advertised it in the Chronile Herald Yesterday after Mary Kieth their spokesperson was cornered by the media. Thank goodness for a few trails folks, environmental watchdogs and canoers or we would have been finding out about our new neighbors in the paper after the fact.
    Flag
  40. 140
    Name: Frank Oram on Mar 1, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  41. 141
    Name: Gary McOrmond on Mar 1, 2009
    Comments: I am strongly in favor of the Government of NS buying back the 170,000 acres of Irving land.
    Flag
  42. 142
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 1, 2009
    Comments: this property should definetly be bought by our goverment , and into off shore hands
    Flag
  43. 143
    Name: Leon De Vreede on Mar 1, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  44. 144
    Name: Caleb Miles on Mar 1, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  45. 145
    Name: Wayne Rock on Mar 1, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  46. 146
    Name: Andrew Jacques on Mar 1, 2009
    Comments: Get er Bought
    Flag
  47. 147
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 1, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  48. 148
    Name: Jon G Swim on Mar 1, 2009
    Comments: why buy it back its ours anyway...take it...how did they get it in the first place
    Flag
  49. 149
    Name: Jean Allan on Mar 1, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  50. 150
    Name: Jean Allan on Mar 1, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag

Page: « 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, ... 32 »

Sponsored links