Reinstate Bury FC into the FA Cup!

Signatures 6162 total

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, ... 124 › »

1. 151
   Name: Alan Maden on Dec 20, 2006

   Comments: Why was the Chairman of West Ham on the panel when they have previous

   Flag
2. 152
   Name: Anonymous on Dec 20, 2006

   Comments: merry christmas (not)

   Flag
3. 153
   Name: Bill Bennett on Dec 20, 2006

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 154
   Name: Anonymous on Dec 20, 2006

   Comments: disgraceful verdict by the FA, only because we're a lower league team, and refuse to dish out the appropriate punishment to premierhip teams when they clearly break the rules by fielding a reserve team. BURY FC REINSTATED!

   Flag
5. 155
   Name: G.A.Challis on Dec 20, 2006

   Comments: To impose the maximum sentence in a case such as this seems to me to be excessive.This would never happen in a Court of Law. Premiership teams regularly flout the rules of the competition by fielding weakend sides when playing teams from the lower leagues and no sanctions are imposed on them. In this case, the punishment is manifestly excessive.

   Flag
6. 156
   Name: Tony Baylis on Dec 20, 2006

   Comments: Dear FA - please see sense and keep the Shakers in the competition. Tony Baylis (aka Sterra to Heaven) Weymouth FC supporter

   Flag
7. 157
   Name: Anonymous on Dec 20, 2006

   Comments: Reinstate Bury in the fa cup

   Flag
8. 158
   Name: Duncan on Dec 20, 2006

   Comments: f.a dont ave a clue wot day it is stuck up cunts too harsh lets us play chester again

   Flag
9. 159
   Name: Tom Dowler on Dec 20, 2006

   Comments: No to FA double standards. Yes to Bury staying in the cup.

   Flag
10. 160
    Name: Matt Madon on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments: Bury Fc had no reason to be kicked out of the FA cup!! Get them back in!

    Flag
11. 161
    Name: Duncan Allen on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments: THE F.A DONT AVE A CLUE WOT DAY IT LOAD OF STUCK UP CUNTS PUNISH THE SMALL CLUBS TILL DEY DIE AND FALL OUT THE LEAGUE FUC THE F.A

    Flag
12. 162
    Name: Ben Hinchliffe on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments: BURY should b bak in the cup or at most made to pay a replay aainst chester.

    Flag
13. 163
    Name: Mr Brian Herron on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments: Double standards - reverse the decision NOW

    Flag
14. 164
    Name: Les Lowe on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments: Honesty isn't always the best policy.

    Flag
15. 165
    Name: Bucketbanger on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments: Losers

    Flag
16. 166
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 167
    Name: Brian Valentine on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments: If the FA is to retain any credibility it must demonstrate consistency and logic in its decision making.

    Flag
18. 168
    Name: Chris Murray on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 169
    Name: Chris Murray on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 170
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments: Good luck from a PNE fan

    Flag
21. 171
    Name: Stuart Robertson on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments: Heres hoping common sense will prevail. From a PNE fan.

    Flag
22. 172
    Name: Len Scott on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments: Get real and pay attention to the real problems.

    Flag
23. 173
    Name: Joe Dag & Red Fc on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 174
    Name: MUFC on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments: Shocking treatment of a club that has been honest enough to own up to their MINOR error. Is this the price you now pay for honesty Does A small administration error really constitute being thrown out of the competition that Chris Casper and the players have worked so hard to progress in Nothing short of a disgrace! Good luck Bury.

    Flag
25. 175
    Name: $izzle on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments: it was a mistake we all make them we learn from them give us another chance it not right we should ave the right to fight for our place

    Flag
26. 176
    Name: Fiona Mackay on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments: i think it's a very harsh punishment that the FA handed out to Bury fc. They are a hardworking honest club who when realised their mistake informed you immediately, which if they didnt do then then this matter would proberly of gone unnoticed. when i was growing up i was always told honestly was the best policy and things will be better for owning up and telling the truth. it must just be a northern thing because that obviously isnt the case. Bury beat Chester city fair and square on the replay. they were the better team and deserved to win. Turnbull didnt play much part of the game and the scoreline would still be the same. Bury won that game through hard work and merit, and one honest mistake has meant that all that has gone down the drain. Bury had recieved permisson of the parent club to play Turnbull, and the intention was there for it to be sent to the FA, there was no intention to cheat our way into the third round. i would like the FA to review the punishment issued to Bury FC and a fine or the game to be replayed instead.

    Flag
27. 177
    Name: Adam Barnes on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments: Absolute disgrace, if you ask me. Theres no consistencey. PS Burnley fan

    Flag
28. 178
    Name: Adam Barnes on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments: Absolute disgrace, if you ask me. Theres no consistencey. PS Burnley fan

    Flag
29. 179
    Name: Graeme Walters on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments: An absolute disgrace,but not surprising at all when it comes to the weak-kneed yes men at the English FA. I wonder if the same punishment would have been dished out if the culprit was one of our wonderful Premiership clubs Somehow I doubt it very much! The FA have again showed they are the 'sheriff of Nottingham' of football in this country.Rob from the poor and give to the rich....

    Flag
30. 180
    Name: Stephen McGrann on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments: My Point is simple. Why have Leeds United recently been fined only £2k, deducted no points and allowed to stay in their competition after what must have been a clear rule break that they never owned up to - it was discovered by the FA whereas Bury are ejected after an insignificant error that if it hadn't been owned up to would never have been spoken of again. Bury FC should be commended for their honesty and not punished.

    Flag
31. 181
    Name: John Lee on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments: This is an absolute disgrace especially when you look at the let off that Leeds have got. Either treat clubs equally or don't punish anyone,

    Flag
32. 182
    Name: Matt Pearson on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments: Stop making a joke of 'the beautiful game'!

    Flag
33. 183
    Name: Mark Morleo on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments: Disgraceful double standards and blatant evidence that in football there is one rule for the "big clubs" and one for the others. The FA should be ashamed

    Flag
34. 184
    Name: Graeme Walters on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments: An absolute disgrace,but not surprising at all when it comes to the weak-kneed yes men at the English FA. I wonder if the same punishment would have been dished out if the culprit was one of our wonderful Premiership clubs Somehow I doubt it very much! The FA have again showed they are the 'sheriff of Nottingham' of football in this country.Rob from the poor and give to the rich.... Good luck from Blackpool

    Flag
35. 185
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 186
    Name: Shaun Tunstall on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 187
    Name: Jack Oates on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments: What's the difference between the West Ham incident and the Bury incident Absolutely nothing! The FA should be ashamed by their decision - no way are they fit enough to run our league's. I'm not a Bury fan but I feel the whole thing is utterly scandelous - the worst punishment - the WORST - is that the game should have been re-played.

    Flag
38. 188
    Name: Ciaran Callan on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments: Football should be won on the pitch and not in the boardroom. Hartlepool United's fault and not Bury's...punish them instead for thier error

    Flag
39. 189
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments: Bury deserve to be re-instated. Disgraceful double standards biased towards perceived bigger clubs (Leeds). Hope the FA (as in, know F*** All) see sense. (Preston fan)

    Flag
40. 190
    Name: Mark Nixon on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments: Being a Bury fan this is baised, but we out played Chester that night and there fans will even admit that. YES, we broke the rules but WE admitted it. I think the fairest thing for both sides would be a replay. Thank you to the people who have showed there support so far.

    Flag
41. 191
    Name: Liam Smith on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 192
    Name: Tarquin Scott on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments: The FA are an utter disgrace in this matter. I have lost all faith in them to run the game fairly for all clubs.

    Flag
43. 193
    Name: Matt Loxham on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments: This is a disgrace. Bury field one ineligible player and are kicked out of the world's finest cup competition, costing them over £50,000. Leeds United do the same in a league game, and are fined £1,000. To say this is double standards against a small, unfashionable team, is an understatement of rather large proportions.

    Flag
44. 194
    Name: Joe on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments: The FA lose the plot yet again. A replay would have been fairer. All the best from a Tranmere fan.

    Flag
45. 195
    Name: Nick Metcalfe on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments: The FA needto show some common sense

    Flag
46. 196
    Name: Darren Addison on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments: Again, the FA an absolute disgrace. Couldnt organise a piss up in a brewery.

    Flag
47. 197
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments: Lower league football is being distroyed the f.a dont have a clue. Good luck with the appeal bury. Weymuff fan

    Flag
48. 198
    Name: Malcolm Green on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
49. 199
    Name: David Willis on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments: Manchester United and other big clubs have broken rules at will re full strength squads and blind eyes are turned. Bury own up to something to which they did not benefit from nor deliberately sought to do the punishment is way beyond reasonable

    Flag
50. 200
    Name: Dave Cliff on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments: This punishment is way to harsh for what amounts to an innocent administrative error. To be thrown out is unbelievable. Contrast with the constant cheating in the Premier league that continually gets unpunished by the FA.

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, ... 124 › »