Signatures 6164 total
Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, ... 124 › »
-
101
Name: Phil Seligman on Dec 20, 2006Comments: In this world of modern communication it is over harsh to exclude Bury for not obtaining written permission when Hartlepool had confirmed their agreement to Turnbull playing in the replay. Plus Bury admitted the error. At least show some compassionFlag
-
102
Name: Dave L on Dec 20, 2006Comments: Quite soFlag
-
103
Name: Daniel Freer on Dec 20, 2006Comments: FA shame on youFlag
-
104
Name: Thomas on Dec 20, 2006Comments: A terrible decision. The FA are uselessFlag
-
105
Name: Shane Walsh on Dec 20, 2006Comments: Get Bury back in.Flag
-
106
Name: Sam Gooding on Dec 20, 2006Comments:Flag
-
107
Name: Kevin Banks on Dec 20, 2006Comments: Morally everything was done. Administratively, there may have been an error. Which is more important Bury are a fantastic club and their game agains us (weymouth) was a great ad for the competition. Are administrators going to spoil that for the sake of a bit of A4Flag
-
108
Name: Anonymous on Dec 20, 2006Comments: put the shakers back in, they hold the record for the highest fa cup final score lineFlag
-
109
Name: Vincent Thompson on Dec 20, 2006Comments: shambles...all i can sayFlag
-
110
Name: Frank Shiers on Dec 20, 2006Comments: This is a completely inappropriate and inconsistent penalty against a small club who don't have the clout of the larger clubs. It's absolutely disgusting. I reaching a point where I believe that it would be better if smaller clubs all pulled out of the FA altogether and censured themselves.Flag
-
111
Name: Andrew Mercer on Dec 20, 2006Comments: Double standards.. one rule for the rich and another fot the poor. The FA is charged with making the game fair. for all and it clearly is not. When fans see such double standards it is no wonder they are voting with there feet. Does anyone inside the FA careFlag
-
112
Name: Ian Dickinson on Dec 20, 2006Comments:Flag
-
113
Name: Jon Haslam on Dec 20, 2006Comments:Flag
-
114
Name: Phil Smyth on Dec 20, 2006Comments: I agree, if it was Chelsea or Manchester United etc. they would have done nothingFlag
-
115
Name: Chris Garratt on Dec 20, 2006Comments: i think its disgraceful that a team should be expelled for little more than a mistake with paperworkFlag
-
116
Name: Anonymous on Dec 20, 2006Comments: This is not an even-handed punishmentFlag
-
117
Name: H. Meredith on Dec 20, 2006Comments:Flag
-
118
Name: Alex Warents on Dec 20, 2006Comments:Flag
-
119
Name: Chris Atkinson on Dec 20, 2006Comments: bring back the shakers!Flag
-
120
Name: Chris Aldred on Dec 20, 2006Comments: com on u shakers u can do lets show them it aint truFlag
-
121
Name: Anthony Jackson on Dec 20, 2006Comments:Flag
-
122
Name: Anonymous on Dec 20, 2006Comments:Flag
-
123
Name: Chris Grewer on Dec 20, 2006Comments:Flag
-
124
Name: Alex Roberts on Dec 20, 2006Comments: Hello, i'm from Swansea and we've got Sheff Utd. In next round i'd be gutted if that happened to my team and facing Ipswich is a glamour tie for a League 2 side and if the club gave permission for him to play, there's nout wrong with that. Best Wishes and good luck for the future, Alex (property of SCFC)Flag
-
125
Name: Jon Haslam on Dec 20, 2006Comments: having been a supporter for around 20 years of Bury Fc i find the decision to remove my beloved club from the fa cup 3rd round as a travesty. yes , of course rules have been breached but why o why should they be punished this harshly for owning up to it!! does honesty not count for anything these days. The FA and the football league are trying to clean up the sport we all love with a passion. Footballers in the FA premier league can dive, fall over and generally cheat but does anything as dramatic as this happen,no it does not. Are Bury FC not quite a big enough club to get away with such an oversite. I am English and as such i have been brought up to be honest and treat others as i would like to be treated myself. With this in mind please reconsider your decision and at the very least give us a chance of a replayed match with Chester City. Consistency Honesty, Integrity,, Plenty of people care about Bury FC. Have a heart ... please. thanks for taking the time to read this heartfelt plea!! JonFlag
-
126
Name: Anonymous on Dec 20, 2006Comments:Flag
-
127
Name: Jonny Richardson on Dec 20, 2006Comments: Without doubt Bury FC have picked on because they're a so called 'smaller club'. Why do the FA appear to support 'bigger clubs' and disregard the roots of English football I stopped watching the FA Premiership many years ago now. I will now stop watching the FA Cup until Bury are reinstated or until the authorities start showing more consistency in their punishments. Football has become a joke in this country. Jonny Preston North EndFlag
-
128
Name: Holly Jackson on Dec 20, 2006Comments:Flag
-
129
Name: Mark Dunne on Dec 20, 2006Comments: you are ruining the game . step backand have a think .Flag
-
130
Name: Will Monks on Dec 20, 2006Comments:Flag
-
131
Name: Anonymous on Dec 20, 2006Comments:Flag
-
132
Name: Mark Gale on Dec 20, 2006Comments: This is a disgrace! Sort it out FA - You're becoming a laughing stock!Flag
-
133
Name: Steve James on Dec 20, 2006Comments: This is an unfair decision. Surely the punishement is disproportionate to the offence and thus against the ECJ principle of proportionality. There are mitigating circumstances and a more lenient punishment is both fair and reasonable.Flag
-
134
Name: Dale Scurr on Dec 20, 2006Comments:Flag
-
135
Name: Anonymous on Dec 20, 2006Comments: Here's another example of FA cowardice. RULES OF THE FA CUP COMPETITION 15 PROVISIONS CONCERNING PLAYERS (a) Each team participating in a match shall represent the full available strength of each competing club. JANUARY 3, 2006 MANCHESTER UNITED v ARSENAL (FA Premier League) Van Der Sar, Neville, Ferdinand, Brown, Silvestre, Ronaldo, Fletcher, O'Shea, Giggs, Rooney, Van Nistelrooy. JANUARY 8, 2006 MANCHESTER UNITED v BURTON (FA Cup Round Three) Howard, Brown, Pique, Silvestre, Bardsley, O'Shea, Jones, Richardson, Solskjaer, Saha, Rossi. A clear breach of rule 15(a) unless the club present the FA with medical documentation to say that the other seven players were unfit.Flag
-
136
Name: Gaz B on Dec 20, 2006Comments: Im a Bolton supporter so I HATE BURY, but even i feel sorry for them! This is too far!!!!!Flag
-
137
Name: Mike Francis on Dec 20, 2006Comments: This is a travesty of justice, the player was not "cup-tied" the club admitted their error. Would you prefer a"bung"Flag
-
138
Name: Will on Dec 20, 2006Comments:Flag
-
139
Name: Anonymous on Dec 20, 2006Comments: bigger teams get away with much moreFlag
-
140
Name: Andrew Alcock on Dec 20, 2006Comments: I feel that this action is inconsistent when compared to such as that applied to such bigger clubs as Leeds United. The honesty of Bury should be congratulated and not punished. As a supporter of Preston North End my comments are independent to the teams concerned. This decision is totally unaceptable and should be reversed immediately for the sake of our great game.Flag
-
141
Name: Phil Thorp on Dec 20, 2006Comments: The Football Association are a sick joke and are unfit to run our national game. How, when Bury FC came to them to admit an honest mistake, could they slap them down with the heaviest penalty Bullies are also cowards... Here's an example of FA cowardice. RULES OF THE FA CUP COMPETITION 15 PROVISIONS CONCERNING PLAYERS (a) Each team participating in a match shall represent the full available strength of each competing club. JANUARY 3, 2006 MANCHESTER UNITED v ARSENAL (FA Premier League) Van Der Sar, Neville, Ferdinand, Brown, Silvestre, Ronaldo, Fletcher, O'Shea, Giggs, Rooney, Van Nistelrooy. JANUARY 8, 2006 MANCHESTER UNITED v BURTON (FA Cup Round Three) Howard, Brown, Pique, Silvestre, Bardsley, O'Shea, Jones, Richardson, Solskjaer, Saha, Rossi. A clear breach of rule 15(a) unless the club present the FA with medical documentation to say that the other seven players were unfit. What did the FA do Yeah, you guessed.... FA!Flag
-
142
Name: Onlyme on Dec 20, 2006Comments: Why dont you just let them replay it its been done before....Flag
-
143
Name: David Ingham on Dec 20, 2006Comments: As Bury held thier hands up immediately they realised their mistake surely some leniancy could have been shown by the committee. Such as allowing Bury to continue in the competition but denighing them the prize money for the fixtureFlag
-
144
Name: Barry Roberts on Dec 20, 2006Comments: Swansea City fan supporting Bury!Flag
-
145
Name: Craig Halliday on Dec 20, 2006Comments: its out of order to kick bury fc out of the fa cup ,i bet if it was a big club like man utd they would be given a fine so lets get bury fc back in the fa cup. a pne fanFlag
-
146
Name: Dik Dastardly on Dec 20, 2006Comments: Disgraceful double sttandards by an out of touch incomitent FA.Flag
-
147
Name: James Ryall on Dec 20, 2006Comments: Why are Bury being treated in a different manner to other members of the FAFlag
-
148
Name: Nantothree on Dec 20, 2006Comments: I think the decision against Bury was grossly unfair, Especially when Leeds gat away with a minmum fine, Double standards once again from the FAFlag
-
149
Name: Steven Donaldson on Dec 20, 2006Comments: Double Standards! Come on see some sense! Treat them the same as LeedsFlag
-
150
Name: Alan Maden on Dec 20, 2006Comments: Why was the Chairman of West Ham on the panel when they have previousFlag