Reinstate Bury FC into the FA Cup!

Signatures 6164 total

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ... 124 › »

1. 51
   Name: Merk Lomas on Dec 20, 2006

   Comments: i can't believe a club can lose a game of football bacause a piece of paper hadn't been filled out. football is a game of entertainment which has become about money and filling the right criterea it makes me sick as i was one person who forked out

   Flag
2. 52
   Name: Steve Dunn on Dec 20, 2006

   Comments: From Weymouth

   Flag
3. 53
   Name: Anne Bent on Dec 20, 2006

   Comments: We are an honest Club, who made a mistake and owned up, your punishment does not reflect that and I urge you to reconsider your position.

   Flag
4. 54
   Name: Tony Sapsford on Dec 20, 2006

   Comments: Disgusting decision, would this happen to premiership team

   Flag
5. 55
   Name: Anonymous on Dec 20, 2006

   Comments: Bury should be back in the cup!! If this had been a club like chelsea they wouldnt have been knocked out. Football is corrupt becasue of this. Its one rule for the small clubs and another for the clubs like Chelsea and Man Utd.

   Flag
6. 56
   Name: Manchester City FC on Dec 20, 2006

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 57
   Name: Ian White on Dec 20, 2006

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 58
   Name: Anonymous on Dec 20, 2006

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 59
   Name: Andy Warren on Dec 20, 2006

   Comments: Have already sent an email in protest to the FA. Read the piece above and as a Leeds fan, completely agree with the injustice of the penalty. My hometown team Weymouth were knocked out of the FA Cup FAIRLY by Bury, great club, great fans, great big admin error, ludicrous penalty for trusting another club or making an admin error. Reinstate them, or at the least order a replay with Chester, how hollow their passage into Round 3 must be and how embarrassed must the FA feel about coming down on the little boys again without having the balls to keep the big one's in check. FA sort it out Andy Warren Weymouth and Leeds.

   Flag
10. 60
    Name: Stuart Cook on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments: This was a disgraceful decision.

    Flag
11. 61
    Name: Claire Cook on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments: From Crystal Palace. Best wishes

    Flag
12. 62
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments: what a joke, FA sometimes are so stupid, how could they punish a team who informed them of what had happened!!!!!!

    Flag
13. 63
    Name: Mike B on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments: !!!!!

    Flag
14. 64
    Name: Claire Cook on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments: From Crystal Palace. Best wishes

    Flag
15. 65
    Name: Andrew Wytwyckyj on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments: A classic example of the FA looking after the bigger clubs.

    Flag
16. 66
    Name: Tony Brearley on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments: outragerous simple mistake

    Flag
17. 67
    Name: David London on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments: Palace fan Why punish the fans of Bury by denying them a cup run due to a technicality which was the fault of an administrator

    Flag
18. 68
    Name: Chris Whittle on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments: This is an appalling decision! Compared with the gentle slap on the wrist administered to Leeds, it's a travesty.

    Flag
19. 69
    Name: Chris Geddes on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments: The FA should see sense and re-instate Bury into the 3rd Round of the FA Cup. They have earned their place on merit and had a verbal agreement with Hartlepool to play Turnbull.

    Flag
20. 70
    Name: Keith Halsall on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments: Complete over reaction and another example of kick the small clubs bow and scrape to the big boys. A re-play is the obvious thing to do.

    Flag
21. 71
    Name: Darren on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments: the FA are a Joke!!!!!

    Flag
22. 72
    Name: MTFC on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments: A very harsh decision! I have just read Chris Caspers comments and since this was actually an honest mistake that BURY ACTUALLY INFORMED THE FA about I feel a re-play or a fine would have sufficed. Once again the FA have proved themselves out to be the utter fools that we all know they are. Good luck with the appeal. I feel you'll need it against the heartless morons at the FA!

    Flag
23. 73
    Name: Paul Ainsworth on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments: Just goes to show that if you have a big name chairman (Leeds) then you can get away with whatever you like. Re-instate the Shakers now!!

    Flag
24. 74
    Name: Thomas Ankers on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 75
    Name: Jonathan Ellithorn on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments: As a fan of a smaller club i feel Bury have been wrongly treated. And why have leeds only got away with a small fine and have not had points deducted il tell you why because they are a so called "big club" its a shambles

    Flag
26. 76
    Name: David Jones on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments: This issue is just not about Bury, its about the FA making the rules up on the hoof and clearly disregarding smaller clubs in favour of the money men. The FA's credability gets worse and worse, you tap up Portugal's manager (before the world cup) and then deny it - a joke.

    Flag
27. 77
    Name: Nigel Cowan on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments: Sort yourselves out FA, it's fast becoming like a Carry On film up there

    Flag
28. 78
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments: I know it isn't Chesters fault, but maybe a stand by them might help promote some common sense in all this, they would probably agree they lost fair and square, maybe they could earn some serious respect and refuse to play They'd become heroes overnight and would in the long-run gain more than half the profits from one game! We all took DiCanio to our hearts for an act of true sportsmanship, Chester City seize your opportunity.

    Flag
29. 79
    Name: Ste Crossley on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments: Utter Disgrace. The FA need too take a good long look and this and see it as one sheet of paper that did not get signed!

    Flag
30. 80
    Name: Helen Wadge on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments: Double Standards...

    Flag
31. 81
    Name: James Mercer on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 82
    Name: Chris O'Sullivan on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments: I cannot believe you have the audacity to kick out a club for being honest and admitting to a genuine mistake when you allow the premier league to take the piss out of you all the time!!

    Flag
33. 83
    Name: Craig Morley on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments: I ask the FA to reconsider their decision. Whilst St Albans may have set the precedent, there are numerous other issues that go against this decision, including Leeds derisory

    Flag
34. 84
    Name: Jo Miller on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments: An absloute disgrace, the lower division teams are in need of as much extra revenue as possible. This beatuiful game of ours is in danger of being destroyed by foreign benefactors and big wigs in suits who have not supported of paid money to watch a team they are passionate about.. DISGRACEFULL !!!

    Flag
35. 85
    Name: NoMran B on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments: FA chapppps,, U r pillacs 2 dROpp BurYFC (mi-teme) liek a-bigg fat-tUrd owt off FA-COUP. wEE haf wonnd itt (FACOUP] 2 tims {twces) v soUTHportn 4--0 & Debrycountrey 6---0 (THIBESSED)_ lett casPURS boyce bak-inn hoooooooo yessssssssssssssssssss.33

    Flag
36. 86
    Name: Paul Arthur Adams on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments: I wish to express my deep disatisfaction at the outcome of this disciplinary. Bury Football Club admitted a genuine mistake had been made. In no way were the club trying to influence the game by fielding a ringer. The said player was already at the club and verbal permission had been received for him to play by his host club. This is a kick in the teeth for the club who have recently fought back from the jaws of extinction. Chester themselves admitted that the best side won on the night. All we ask is fairness and courage to see justice is done at the appeal. Merry yuletide.

    Flag
37. 87
    Name: Paul Arthur Adams on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments: I wish to express my deep disatisfaction at the outcome of this disciplinary. Bury Football Club admitted a genuine mistake had been made. In no way were the club trying to influence the game by fielding a ringer. The said player was already at the club and verbal permission had been received for him to play by his host club. This is a kick in the teeth for the club who have recently fought back from the jaws of extinction. Chester themselves admitted that the best side won on the night. All we ask is fairness and courage to see justice is done at the appeal. Merry yuletide.

    Flag
38. 88
    Name: Pete Gray on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 89
    Name: James Woodruff on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 90
    Name: Angela Mason on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 91
    Name: Colin Mason on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 92
    Name: Ed N on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments: This seems ridiculously unfair after Bury took the trouble to admit their error to the FA instead of just lying low. Put my name down

    Flag
43. 93
    Name: Liam Mason on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 94
    Name: Andy Watt on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments: The decision is a disgrace, especially coming so soon after essentially letting Leeds United off for a similar offence. At least Bury were honest about the mistake, whcih Leeds were not.

    Flag
45. 95
    Name: Aaron Oliver on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments: it is a total travesty what the FA did to Bury, especially after they admitted their fault

    Flag
46. 96
    Name: John Risby on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments: Crazy decision - if Bury had hidden the fact they had made a mistake then fine, kick them out, but they came forward with the information in the first place. What does this say to the next club to make an innocent mistake That they might as well hide the fact and hope they get away with it

    Flag
47. 97
    Name: Joe on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments: An awful decision-would it be the same outcome had it been Man Utd

    Flag
48. 98
    Name: Sam on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments: go Bury

    Flag
49. 99
    Name: Tim Birkett on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments: More FA Cup wins than Chester & Ipswich put together!!

    Flag
50. 100
    Name: Kevin Gale on Dec 20, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ... 124 › »