Powered by iPetitions - Start your online petition now

Signatures 378 total

Page: « 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, ... 8 »

  1. 101
    Name: Pierpaolo Andriani on Mar 2, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  2. 102
    Name: Spartak Keremidchiev on Mar 2, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  3. 103
    Name: Dr Peter Dwyer on Mar 2, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  4. 104
    Name: Jimmy Donaghey on Mar 2, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  5. 105
    Name: Jonathan Perraton on Mar 2, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  6. 106
    Name: Erik S Reinert on Mar 2, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  7. 107
    Name: Kean Birch on Mar 2, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  8. 108
    Name: Fergus Lyon on Mar 2, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  9. 109
    Name: Ekkehart Schlicht on Mar 2, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  10. 110
    Name: Leonith Hinojosa on Mar 2, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  11. 111
    Name: Dr Richard Weston on Mar 2, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  12. 112
    Name: John Powles on Mar 2, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  13. 113
    Name: Salvatore Rizzello on Mar 2, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  14. 114
    Name: Nick Winder on Mar 2, 2010
    Comments: This is a 10-20 year problem. In the short-term, cuts are less important than redistribution and growth. Freezing the economy with cuts would be disastrous.
    Flag
  15. 115
    Name: Marc Jacquinet on Mar 2, 2010
    Comments: It is time to rethink economic policy, regulation policy and to build a new deal for socal justice, sustainability and renewable resources. The budget hysteria in the US, UK and continental Europe is still following the irrational path of the last 15 years or so. The problem is not going backward but to go ahead with innovative solutions. Marc Jacquinet
    Flag
  16. 116
    Name: Piet Keizer on Mar 2, 2010
    Comments: I fully support the text. A few weeks ago I sent a text to the famous Dutch newspaper - Het Financieele dagblad - where I criticised the mainstream textbooks for uncritically using anglo-saxon concepts with respect to the calculation of budget deficits. Implicit in this approsch is the idea that governments are not productive, and cannot invest.What they actually do is just consumption!! That's their reason to claim that government 'investments'must not be financed by means of lending. The process of necvessary money creation must run via the private and never via the public sector. Unfortunately my texts about this issue are published in Dutch. But on my personal website I have also published a "Pleas for Pluralism" as an attempt to break the neoclassical monopoly. The textbook I use is an example of this dominance: Principles of Economics, written by Robert Frank and Ben Bernanke, while McDowell and Thom are co-editors of the European Edition. My personal webiste is: www.pietkeizer.nl.
    Flag
  17. 117
    Name: Bjorn Johnson on Mar 2, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  18. 118
    Name: Carole Elliott on Mar 2, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  19. 119
    Name: Rosaria Conte on Mar 2, 2010
    Comments: No need to be expert economists to understand and share the petition.
    Flag
  20. 120
    Name: Shaun Le Boutillier on Mar 2, 2010
    Comments: I completely agree and would add onefurther point. Companies that survive recessions prosper when the market improves. In a global economy it makes no economic sense to encourage companies to go bankrupt by suppressing demand. It is equivalent to giving away a (future) portion of a market share of good or service. It is a short-sighted policy.
    Flag
  21. 121
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 2, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  22. 122
    Name: Klaus Nielsen on Mar 2, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  23. 123
    Name: Nick Potts on Mar 2, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  24. 124
    Name: Dr Frank Currie on Mar 2, 2010
    Comments: As others have indicated, our national economic credibility will also be threatened by economic policies which hurt our economy and greatly increase unemployment.
    Flag
  25. 125
    Name: Philippe MINARD on Mar 2, 2010
    Comments: public sector expenses are useful
    Flag
  26. 126
    Name: Mary.joannou on Mar 2, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  27. 127
    Name: Jonathan Hearn on Mar 2, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  28. 128
    Name: Gideon Calder on Mar 2, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  29. 129
    Name: I Hargreaves on Mar 2, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  30. 130
    Name: Tony Weekes on Mar 2, 2010
    Comments: Monetary reform, please ... not 'budget balancing'; 'good work', not 'job creation'; 'citizen's (basic) income', not 'quantitative easing (in its present form)'!
    Flag
  31. 131
    Name: Dr Jussi Parikka on Mar 2, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  32. 132
    Name: Michael Best on Mar 2, 2010
    Comments: The return to growth, however, will depend upon government leadership in the development of renewable energy and clean technology sectors. The growth in the recent past imbalanced the economy by relying too heavily on financial and property markets.
    Flag
  33. 133
    Name: Kerstin Hacker on Mar 2, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  34. 134
    Name: Russell Smith on Mar 2, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  35. 135
    Name: Paul Bloomfield on Mar 2, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  36. 136
    Name: Helen Wood on Mar 2, 2010
    Comments: Continuing with the old system will not do - economically or environmentally. This is the time for the Labour government and all democratic mindedly politicians to introduce such a Green New Deal - they will be rewarded by a new enthusiasm for politics!
    Flag
  37. 137
    Name: John White on Mar 2, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  38. 138
    Name: Vidal Ruiz ElĂșa on Mar 2, 2010
    Comments: This would be the advice to Spain too.
    Flag
  39. 139
    Name: Guido Rings on Mar 2, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  40. 140
    Name: Grahame Thompson on Mar 2, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  41. 141
    Name: Emma Brett on Mar 2, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  42. 142
    Name: William Luker on Mar 2, 2010
    Comments: In the US the hysterical clamor for deficit reduction through spending cuts is even worse. And, of course, we are not even capable of addressing the dire consequences of Job loss that, not incidentally, is falling on people of all ages.
    Flag
  43. 143
    Name: Matko Mestrovic on Mar 2, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  44. 144
    Name: Louise Mckeon on Mar 2, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  45. 145
    Name: Lee Crofts on Mar 2, 2010
    Comments: Surely cutting jobs only increases the ability to pay the deficit. Stop this insanity.
    Flag
  46. 146
    Name: K. Cowling on Mar 2, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  47. 147
    Name: Nicholas Howarth on Mar 2, 2010
    Comments: The crisis is both a symptom of an system which was poorly aligned to the economic and political realities of our changing world and an opportunity for realignment. A window has now been presented so that businesses which focus on sustainability and clean energy can be rewarded. Politicians however must play their role to change institutional matrix to support this.
    Flag
  48. 148
    Name: Deyi Zhou on Mar 2, 2010
    Comments: It is the time to think economic crisis in a big picture. And change of paradigm. Old economic growth driving forces no longer work for developed economies. It is the sustainability of life rather the economy that our ultimate goal should be.
    Flag
  49. 149
    Name: Christopher Joyce on Mar 2, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  50. 150
    Name: Nick Hillman on Mar 2, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag

Page: « 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, ... 8 »

Sponsored links