Signatures 378 total
Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ... 8 › »
-
51
Name: Alex Williams on Feb 28, 2010Comments: The debate should not be on cutting but on what we are spending on. An opportunity to invest in sustainable projects that we need such as green power to balance any longer term debt issues. Invest for growth will enable us to be in stronger place to recover and in the areas which will give us a stronger more stable economy.Flag
-
52
Name: Stuart Weir on Feb 28, 2010Comments:Flag
-
53
Name: Jude Bloomfield on Feb 28, 2010Comments: Instead of cuts we need a green industrial policy, including intervention to save windturbines and electric car producers and public investment in green technologies and infrastructure such as combined heat and power systems, hydrogen fuel cells, green roofs.Flag
-
54
Name: Guy Aitchison on Feb 28, 2010Comments:Flag
-
55
Name: Tim Haigh on Mar 1, 2010Comments: Part of the reason that bankers' bonuses are such a hot potato these days is that a great many people had no idea of the sheer scale of remuneration that bankers enjoyed: objecting to the bonises is a peg to hang a more general disgust on. Wehere political parties fret about welfare pyaments making it not worth while for some people to get a job, their answer is generally to cut welfar. But the problem is our acceptance of a huge low-pay economy. If people were offered a living wage for working, they would be less inclined to survive on benefits. A transfer of money from the very rich to the very poor is the elephant in the room, as it always is. First move - cast iron rates of tax on high incomes (50% on income over a certain level is not punitive) and a higher minimum wage.Flag
-
56
Name: Frances Kirkham on Mar 1, 2010Comments:Flag
-
57
Name: Bill Longdon on Mar 1, 2010Comments:Flag
-
58
Name: Anna Robinson on Mar 1, 2010Comments:Flag
-
59
Name: Teresa O'Brien on Mar 1, 2010Comments:Flag
-
60
Name: Lena Easton on Mar 1, 2010Comments:Flag
-
61
Name: Alison Fell on Mar 1, 2010Comments:Flag
-
62
Name: Trenton Field on Mar 1, 2010Comments:Flag
-
63
Name: Belinda Geddes on Mar 1, 2010Comments:Flag
-
64
Name: Colin Nave on Mar 1, 2010Comments:Flag
-
65
Name: C S Kirkham on Mar 1, 2010Comments:Flag
-
66
Name: Joe Burns on Mar 1, 2010Comments:Flag
-
67
Name: Vanessa Sparrowhawk on Mar 1, 2010Comments:Flag
-
68
Name: Dr L Wilson on Mar 2, 2010Comments:Flag
-
69
Name: Mickaël Clévenot on Mar 2, 2010Comments:Flag
-
70
Name: Richard Carter on Mar 2, 2010Comments:Flag
-
71
Name: Emma Wright on Mar 2, 2010Comments:Flag
-
72
Name: Pierre-Marie Bosc on Mar 2, 2010Comments:Flag
-
73
Name: Michael Dietrich on Mar 2, 2010Comments:Flag
-
74
Name: Paolo Ramazzotti on Mar 2, 2010Comments:Flag
-
75
Name: Don Slater on Mar 2, 2010Comments:Flag
-
76
Name: Sue Konzelmann on Mar 2, 2010Comments:Flag
-
77
Name: Alex Coad on Mar 2, 2010Comments:Flag
-
78
Name: Paul Cockshott on Mar 2, 2010Comments: There is notable failure to focus on the trade deficit as a cause of the public sector deficit.Flag
-
79
Name: Chassagnon on Mar 2, 2010Comments:Flag
-
80
Name: Andrew Sayer on Mar 2, 2010Comments:Flag
-
81
Name: Jonathan Hopkin on Mar 2, 2010Comments:Flag
-
82
Name: BORTIS Heinrich on Mar 2, 2010Comments: I really DO agree with the petition!Flag
-
83
Name: Hans Schenk on Mar 2, 2010Comments:Flag
-
84
Name: Dieter Bögenhold on Mar 2, 2010Comments:Flag
-
85
Name: Carlota Perez on Mar 2, 2010Comments:Flag
-
86
Name: Andrew Watt (ETUI, Brussels) on Mar 2, 2010Comments:Flag
-
87
Name: Elizabeth Garnsey on Mar 2, 2010Comments:Flag
-
88
Name: David Tyfield on Mar 2, 2010Comments:Flag
-
89
Name: David Steele on Mar 2, 2010Comments:Flag
-
90
Name: Pietro P. Masina on Mar 2, 2010Comments:Flag
-
91
Name: Todor Balabanov on Mar 2, 2010Comments: Based rigorously on microeconomic theory the general equilibrium approach provides a comprehensive framework for studying the effects of policy interference on all markets of an economy. The simultaneous explanation of income generation and spending for all economic agents allows us to address both efficiency as well as distributional effects of policy changes. This is why applied general equilibrium (AGE) models have become a standard tool for quantitative policy analysis. In addressing the Impacts of Globalization on the UK´s labor market we will have to be taking into account the comparative advantages of the country specific production factors. To that end we are developing an applied general equilibrium modeling approach to analyze employment and unemployment effects of both the UK´s labor market support framework and the Globalization.Flag
-
92
Name: J Paul Dunne on Mar 2, 2010Comments:Flag
-
93
Name: Wolfgang Blaas on Mar 2, 2010Comments:Flag
-
94
Name: Peter E. Earl on Mar 2, 2010Comments:Flag
-
95
Name: Renato Vitolo on Mar 2, 2010Comments:Flag
-
96
Name: Bronislaw Szerszynski on Mar 2, 2010Comments:Flag
-
97
Name: Birgitte Andersen on Mar 2, 2010Comments:Flag
-
98
Name: Renee Prendergast on Mar 2, 2010Comments:Flag
-
99
Name: Andrew Mearman on Mar 2, 2010Comments:Flag
-
100
Name: Bob Jessop on Mar 2, 2010Comments:Flag