Sign Petition

Boycott Getty Images!

1,040 Signatures Goal: 1,000

Over 500+ Photo Industry Followers on Twitter!

The Purpose of This Petition

The purpose of this petition is to collect signatures & comments regarding a highly unethical business practice known as the Getty Images"Settlement Demand Letter", and to inform and shape public opinion which will ultimately bring about change. Getty Images must cease this unethical practice immediately.


This is an important cause, and would like to encourage you to add your signature and share this petition with others. Once enough signatures have been received in support, this petition will be submitted to the US Federal Authorities in Seattle, WA who oversee Getty Images corporate business practices and are in charge of US Consumer Protections.


About Getty Images

Getty Imagesis the leading provider of digital media content worldwide, and owns the rights to the largest collection of photographic images in the world. The next time you see a television commercial, flip through a magazine, visit a website, or choose a greeting card, it is most likely that the image that catches your eye was provided by Getty Images. Getty Images is headed by billionaire ChairmanMark Getty, heir to the Sir J. Paul Getty Oil fortune; and.Jonathan Klein, Co-Founder and CEO of Getty Images.


The Getty Images "Settlement Demand Letter"

The Getty Images "Settlement Demand Letter" is a deliberate attempt by Getty to intimidate letter recipients, demanding they pay Getty extravagant settlement fees in exchange for Getty agreeing NOT to sue the recipient, who has allegedly infringed on a "photo copyright" maintained by Getty. In many cases, Getty's monetary demand can exceed "100 times" the actual retail value of the photo in question.


For example, Getty's usual monetary demand is $1000+/- per photo allegedly displayed on a website without a copyright licence, even if the photo in question only retails for $1. Given how many photos are on an average website or blog, Getty's copyright infringement claims can quickly add up in to the "tens of thousands" of dollars in damages in many cases, causing severe financial stress and lasting emotional harm to its targeted victim.


Getty Images "Primary Targets"

Getty's primary targets appear to be ordinary citizens, webmasters & small to mid size business owners who acquired their website or blog originally through legitimate means with photos already included in their packages. And others through popular photo sharing sites where copyrighted images may have been stolen, and placed on these sites labeled as free for use.


In many innocent cases, the letter recipient has no knowledge of Getty Images or the photo copyrights in question. In the majority of cases the recipient's do not have the financial resources to hire legal counsel to fight Getty in US Federal Court, the legal venue where all copyright infringement cases are tried in the United States.


Getty Images Seeks "Punitive Damages" in All Cases

Even if a Getty letter recipient is completely innocent of all charges and had no knowledge of the claims being levied against them, Getty still asserts that they are fully responsible under US Copyright law and must pay Getty "punitive damages", the strongest form of legal financial punishment awarded by US Courts.


However, little does the letter recipient know that under US Law, punitive damages can ONLY be awarded in special cases where (1) the defendant has displayed actual intent to cause harm and (2) the defendant's conduct was egregiously insidious.


In all cases, Getty does not contact the recipient prior, review the recipient's response to the claim, gather any facts of the case, or prove intentional harm as required under the law to demand maximum punitive damages.


The Getty Images "Extortion Letter Scheme"

As a result of Getty's unethical practice, thousands of innocent citizens in the US and abroad have suffered unnecessary emotional & financial harm, as this scheme has been practiced at Getty Images for many years.


It is reported that Getty Images has never taken a "Settlement Demand Letter" case to trial in a US Federal Court. Because if it did and there was a ruling against Getty Images, then the letter scheme would have to cease and a legal precedent set. So Getty has a valuable incentive for not bringing any case to federal trial.


The letter recipient either (1) negotiates a financial settlement with Getty (2) Getty sends the matter to collections or (3) Getty ceases to pursue the case.


But this does not mean that the case is permanently dropped forever, as Getty is known to "return years later" and start the same extortion process all over again, and involving the exact same photo licenses.


What Happened to the "Cease & Desist Letter"?

The Getty Images "Settlement Demand Letter" has always been implemented without first notifying the website owner beforehand of a possible photo copyright violation through a traditional legal process known as the Cease & Desist Letter, or "take down notice".


For example, upon Getty's first knowledge that a copyright violation may have occurred, Getty should first send a written notice requesting that the website owner either (1) provide proof of purchase of the photo license in question (2) remove the photo from the website immediately, or else (3) face legal action & financial penalties.


This notice is a very effective tool in achieving the primary goal of copyright compliance and no one gets harmed. However, Getty Images chooses to employ the"Settlement Demand Letter" instead and play the heavy handed role of the accuser, prosecutor, judge, jury & collection agency; with total disregard to the rights of the accused or the actual facts of the case.


Is Getty Really Protecting The Photographer's Copyright & Compensating Them?

Is Getty really protecting the photographer's copyright as they claim? Do Getty's professional photographers actually condone and participate in this practice? What is the photographer's percentage of the financial gains collected by Getty in these cases?


Consumer Friendly "Copyright Protection Alternatives"

There are many viable copyright protection and anti-pirating technologies available which will allow Getty to fully protect their photographer's copyrights and prevent illegal downloading and sharing, while still allowing Getty to remain a good corporate citizen.


Please Support This Important Cause

This petition demands that Getty Images immediately cease its highly unethical practice and announce the implementation of new copyright protection technologies & business practices that are consumer friendly, protect their photographers copyrights and benefit the general public at large.


This is an important cause and we would like to encourage you tosign today. Once enough signatures have been received in support, this petition will be submitted to the US Federal Authorities in Seattle, WA who oversee Getty Images corporate business practices and are in charge of US Consumer Protections.


Please support this petition by (1) signing in the form provided below (2) supporting Getty Images competition and (3) sharing this petition with your family & friends. Our collective consumer purchasing power is how we can make a real and lasting difference and bring about change.


About This Petition


* This petition is created for the benefit of the general public.
* You can choose to share comments with other readers.
* Or you can choose to remain anonymous in your support.
* This petition is maintained by iPetitions.
* We thank them for this innovative public forum.
* Please be considerate of others. Forum etiquette applies.


Your participation can help inform and shape public opinion and ultimately bring about change. Thank you!

Sponsor

Boycott Getty Images! Please support this important cause by adding your signature and sharing this petition with others. Your participation can ultimately bring about change. Thank you for your kind support :-)

Links

         
Getty Research Links
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
-------------------------------
 
Submit your Links!
 
If you have a website link that you would like to share with our petition readers, please email it to:
 
 
-------------------------------
 
Help Improve this Petition!
 
Please send us your "comments & suggestions" on how we can better improve this petition's effectiveness, increase petition signups & gain broader support from the general public at large. Email your comments to:
 
 
 
-------------------------------
 
Sign This Petition!
 
Please support this important cause by adding your signature and sharing this petition with others.
 
Thank you for Your Support!
 
Boycott Getty
 
-------------------------------
 
Follow BoycottGetty on Twitter
 
Please RT!  #BoycottGetty
 
Over 500+ Photographer, Media & Industry Followers on Twitter!
 
 
  • George Ward
    George Ward United States
    Jun 26, 2015
    Jun 26, 2015
    Just like Monsanto, keeping a lot of lawyers on retainer can be quite lucrative ! As long as you wear a three piece suit, it ain'r theft ! Just ask Congress !
  • Brad Flinn
    Brad Flinn United States, Seattle
    Jun 26, 2015
    Jun 26, 2015
    These guys are thieves.
  • Lloyd A. Davis
    Lloyd A. Davis United States, Bradenton
    Jun 25, 2015
    Jun 25, 2015
    I feel that this is an unethical practice, and should be ceased immediately. I further feel that the possibility of civil legal action should be pursued by victims.
  • KWhitaker
    KWhitaker United States, Alexandria
    Jun 18, 2015
    Jun 18, 2015
    Getty Images are not a photo management company but a collection agency. They make most of their money by extorting cash from struggling small businesses. I'm always careful not to use photographer's work without paying but I got the extortion letter and had to pay. I would NEVER purchase any work from Getty and I would implore that photographer's find another source of photo management rather than use these thugs.
See More
749

Signatures

  • 1 week ago
    George Ward United States
    1 week ago
  • 1 week ago
    Brad Flinn United States
    1 week ago
  • 1 week ago
    Lloyd A. Davis United States
    1 week ago
  • 1 week ago
    Kristi Hartman United States
    1 week ago
  • 1 week ago
    Jordan Van Voast United States
    1 week ago
  • 2 weeks ago
    KWhitaker
    2 weeks ago
  • 3 weeks ago
    Ana J.
    3 weeks ago
  • 3 weeks ago
    Scott Gregoire
    3 weeks ago
  • 4 weeks ago
    Johannes S.
    4 weeks ago
  • 4 weeks ago
    Natalia fadejeva
    4 weeks ago
  • 4 weeks ago
    Rebecca Britt United States
    4 weeks ago
  • 4 weeks ago
    Julia McKim
    4 weeks ago
  • 4 weeks ago
    Anthony E. Cozart Sr.
    4 weeks ago
  • 1 month ago
    JSG United States
    1 month ago
  • 1 month ago
    Catherine Tuttle-Tates Creek Animal Hospital
    1 month ago
See More