Signatures 73 total
Page: 1, 2
-
1
Name: Tom Atkinson on Jun 6, 2008Comments: I agree. With the statement. It would be terrible for this site to be developed for housing. Our neighbouring town, Lewes, is a transition town - doing it's best to become self sufficient and help the environment for our future. In view of this, Wealden council should be ashamed to give the go ahead to such an idea. We should be preserving nature, not destroying it. Will the housing be environmetally friendly I think not! The idea of cramming 500 homes into that small space scares me. Crowding, traffic, and no more green pastures to walk through...Flag
-
2
Name: Mark Keane on Jun 10, 2008Comments: It is important to keep this area of natural beauty for the enjoyment of Uckfield residents. Green field sights for housing can no longer be a viable option. We have built on an area the size of Wales since the 60s. We must secure our natural heritage for our children.Flag
-
3
Name: John Keane on Jun 10, 2008Comments: We should be focusing on the redevelopment of brown field development, not taking the easy green field option.Flag
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
-
10
Name: Jayden on Jun 12, 2008Comments: This is a terrible sacrifice of beautiful land! I disagree with this development entirely. More traffic congestion, restricted parking, more fumes, not to mention the destruction of potential habitats for wildlife....all to line someone's pockets So sad..Flag
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
-
15
Name: Amanda Shaw on Jun 16, 2008Comments: I don't believe that enough thought has gone into this. Why should we build on more beautiful green land, and destroy itFlag
-
16
Name: Ian Hayes on Jun 17, 2008Comments: One day soon in the not too distant furture we will be wanting this farmland to grow food crops on... Food prices are rocketing, the less land we have to grow food on the higher they will go...Flag
- 17
-
18
Name: Stephen Harland on Jun 18, 2008Comments: This is the wrong development for Uckfield. Any new housing should be adjacent to the bypass, not on the east side of the town where traffic has to pass through the town itself.Flag
-
19
Name: Sarah Harland on Jun 18, 2008Comments: The valley side that Bird-In -Eye Hill runs up is unspoilt and visible from large parts of the Hempstead, Hempstead Fields, Manor Park parts of the town. The development will be like a sore on this valley.Flag
- 20
- 21
- 22
-
23
Name: Jessica Dixon on Jul 1, 2008Comments: Wont it be a sight when the houses are built, concreteing over more land and allowing more surface rain water to build up and flood the town even better than the last million times the town has flooded from being over developed!!!Flag
- 24
-
25
Name: Christine Stephenson on Jul 15, 2008Comments: We desperately need to keep our green areas. Please do not destroy another one.Flag
-
26
Name: Christine Stephenson on Jul 15, 2008Comments: We desperately need to keep our green areas. Please do not destroy another one.Flag
-
27
Name: Zcott Simpson on Jul 23, 2008Comments: Framfield Road is a buisy enough road as it is - the additional traffice would require parking changes. These changes would reduce existing residents parking as well as increasing the average roadspeed.Flag
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
-
33
Name: Jamie Benson on Jul 25, 2008Comments: his will be disastrous to the local community which is already having trouble sustaining the traffic flow.Flag
-
34
Name: Joanne Vincent on Aug 10, 2008Comments: I moved from Maidstone because every tiny bit of land was being built on. As a result the traffic had become really slow and parking a nightmare. I was hoping that East Sussex would be better. Sadly out of the frying pan into the fireFlag
-
35
Name: Sue Edwards on Aug 12, 2008Comments: Traffic in Uckfield is already far too heavy. This would just make the situation worse. Do we have the resources for more homesFlag
- 36
- 37
-
38
Name: Mary Potter on Oct 21, 2008Comments: The drains cannot take any more waste and the roads are all ready over-loaded.Flag
- 39
- 40
- 41
-
42
Name: Anonymous on Nov 21, 2008Comments: No development that will increase traffic flows into the town, infrastructure improvements must come before any future development in the town.Flag
-
43
Name: Alison Todd on Feb 15, 2009Comments: i have allways lived in Uckfield/ Framfield nd the green has been there all that time nd it should nt be destroyedFlag
- 44
-
45
Name: Anonymous on Mar 25, 2009Comments: It is a shame to hear of more green space being used for cheap housing. Please consider the people who need/want/appreciate open space.Flag
-
46
Name: Anonymous on Sep 9, 2009Comments: WDC seemed determined to ruin this area and are gradually achieving there goal. Lets stop paying our Council Tax because that is the only thing that would make them sit up and listen to local residents about their concerns regarding over-development.Flag
- 47
-
48
Name: Lawrence Leaney on Nov 16, 2009Comments: Quite apart from destroying open countryside any housing here will create an impossible situation along Framfield Road which is already congested and a hazard for ambulances which regularly use it. Any parking restrictions would only cause huge problems in surrounding roads. A crazy ideaFlag
- 49
- 50
Page: 1, 2