BBC and Avalon must NOT Waive Springer Costs

Signatures 1660 total

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, ... 34 › »

1. 101
   Name: John Ericson on Jul 2, 2008

   Comments: The Lord will provide Stephen. He may need you to sell your house, and get you a job in Macdonald's , but he will provide. ...and I think you will look rather cute in your Macdonald's uniform. Perhaps you should start practicing "do you want fries with that" All of a sudden I may start to be a believer ... in karma.

   Flag
2. 102
   Name: Anonymous on Jul 2, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 103
   Name: Michael Byrne on Jul 2, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 104
   Name: Louise on Jul 2, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 105
   Name: Steve Drayton on Jul 2, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 106
   Name: Tim Richards on Jul 2, 2008

   Comments: He lost and should be made an example of.

   Flag
7. 107
   Name: Richard Sandling on Jul 2, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 108
   Name: Thomas Garrett on Jul 2, 2008

   Comments: Here Here!

   Flag
9. 109
   Name: Rob Morris on Jul 2, 2008

   Comments: The process of the law has been duly followed. Green should pay!

   Flag
10. 110
    Name: Anonymous on Jul 2, 2008

    Comments: Pay up, knobber.

    Flag
11. 111
    Name: Dr Henry Potts on Jul 2, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 112
    Name: Katie Ray on Jul 2, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 113
    Name: Anonymous on Jul 2, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 114
    Name: Anonymous on Jul 2, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 115
    Name: David Cottis on Jul 2, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 116
    Name: Lloyd Jones on Jul 2, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 117
    Name: Andy Bean on Jul 2, 2008

    Comments: Make him pay and make him a vexatious litigant.

    Flag
18. 118
    Name: Anonymous on Jul 2, 2008

    Comments: Tough. This is how the law works. Of course, it would be the 'Christian' thing to do to waive costs, but then again, it wasn't very 'Christisan' to try and get another point of view censored. But being a religious fundamentalist, obviously this doesn't enter the equation

    Flag
19. 119
    Name: Phil Harrington on Jul 2, 2008

    Comments: Justice served. Green should pay for his right wing lunacy.

    Flag
20. 120
    Name: Joshua Trupin on Jul 2, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 121
    Name: James Lydon on Jul 2, 2008

    Comments: It is marvellous when natural justice and legal justice meet, so I'm very happy to see it has in this case.

    Flag
22. 122
    Name: Anonymous on Jul 2, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 123
    Name: Lyndsay Fenner on Jul 2, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 124
    Name: Andrew Harrison on Jul 2, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 125
    Name: Canavan Connolly on Jul 2, 2008

    Comments: This man is a joke, and not a funny one.

    Flag
26. 126
    Name: Anonymous on Jul 2, 2008

    Comments: green is bound to pay up. he has lost the court case and must face the consequences

    Flag
27. 127
    Name: John Scott on Jul 2, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 128
    Name: Tom Giles on Jul 2, 2008

    Comments: Damn right. I cannot believe this still has not been paid in full.

    Flag
29. 129
    Name: Dave Starling on Jul 2, 2008

    Comments: Wait, so threatening theatre owners is ok, and not under the judgment of God Not exactly a charitable Christian thing that, eh Stewart Lee has once again shown the hypocrisy in these religious circles.

    Flag
30. 130
    Name: Oliver Guy-Watkins on Jul 2, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
31. 131
    Name: Judy Burns on Jul 2, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 132
    Name: Hayley Turnbull on Jul 2, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 133
    Name: Anonymous on Jul 2, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 134
    Name: Jane Bostock on Jul 2, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 135
    Name: Richard Ellis on Jul 2, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 136
    Name: Anonymous on Jul 2, 2008

    Comments: Here here.

    Flag
37. 137
    Name: Anonymous on Jul 2, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 138
    Name: Anonymous on Jul 2, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 139
    Name: Daniel Kitson on Jul 2, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 140
    Name: Anonymous on Jul 2, 2008

    Comments: Stick it to the man...or at least that guy

    Flag
41. 141
    Name: Anonymous on Jul 2, 2008

    Comments: Why are salaries and funding being brought in as defence...especially if you consider the wealth available to the various Christian Churches - were this to have been an officially sanctioned court case rather than someone simply wishing to censor, the fees would not have been a problem, I believe.

    Flag
42. 142
    Name: Sean Smith on Jul 2, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 143
    Name: Tracy Monger on Jul 2, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 144
    Name: Anonymous on Jul 2, 2008

    Comments: There must be something in the bible about facing up to your actions, however ill-thought out and small minded they may be...

    Flag
45. 145
    Name: Anonymous on Jul 2, 2008

    Comments: The idea of using public money to finance the frivolous litigation of one individual -- furthermore an individual who would seek to suppress the right of a publicly funded broadcaster to challenge ideological orthodoxy -- is repugnant

    Flag
46. 146
    Name: Anne Green on Jul 2, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
47. 147
    Name: Chris Evans on Jul 2, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 148
    Name: Elizabeth Bower on Jul 2, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
49. 149
    Name: James Topping on Jul 2, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 150
    Name: Paul Nash on Jul 2, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, ... 34 › »