Ban the Nepean Bridge

Signatures 411 total

Page: « ‹ 1, ... 6, 7, 8, 9

1. 401
   Name: Anonymous on Aug 27, 2008

   Comments: Andrew Haydon park was a strong part of my childhood and is now a strong part of my children's childhood and recreation. At some point natural resources, recreation and enjoyment have to come before infrastructure. This bridge would be a devastation to the west end's recreation and environment.

   Flag
2. 402
   Name: Kuba Guertin on Aug 31, 2008

   Comments: I know our municipal government comes up with alot of bad ideas, but this is just ridiculous. I thought it was a hoax the first time I read it. Anyway I hope this works out, and I'll try to make the protest if it doesn't.

   Flag
3. 403
   Name: Janice Harvey on Sep 2, 2008

   Comments: Leave Andrew Haydon Park Alone

   Flag
4. 404
   Name: Courtenay Darwin on Sep 8, 2008

   Comments: There is no reason to close a park in order to make transit more convenient. This is a park that has been a part of many peoples lives and upbringings. I'd be willing to bet that half the politicians who want to take it down have fond memories in this park.

   Flag
5. 405
   Name: Sarah Smith on Sep 16, 2008

   Comments: I have enjoyed this park since i was a child, and I think its recreational value outweighs any benefit that an inter-provincial bridge would provide at these locations.

   Flag
6. 406
   Name: Anonymous on Sep 17, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 407
   Name: Melanie Charron on Sep 18, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 408
   Name: Heather Wayner on Sep 18, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 409
   Name: Andrew Neville on Sep 19, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 410
    Name: Garry R Williams on Sep 22, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 411
    Name: Paul Strelka on Dec 29, 2012

    Comments: It's a beautiful park full of families. Don't ruin it! (from a visitor from USA)

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, ... 6, 7, 8, 9