Ban Chinese E-Cig Manufacturers From U.S. Trade Shows

Signatures 38 total

Page: 1

1. 1
   Name: Thomas R. Kiklas on Feb 13, 2013

   Comments: Please cease allowing the Chinese manufacturers of the electronic cigarette to attend U.S. trade shows. They are circumventing the U.S. firms that have built their businesses.

   Flag
2. 2
   Name: Anonymous on Feb 13, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 3
   Name: Vitali Servutas on Feb 14, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 4
   Name: Mark Stagliano on Feb 14, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 5
   Name: Gale G. Jackson And Company on Feb 14, 2013

   Comments: I am an e cig distributor. I am not in favor of e-cig Chinese manufacturers being allowed as an attendee or to exhibit at trade shows there by circumventing us. Please ban them from the US Trade Shows. Gale Jackson

   Flag
6. 6
   Name: Anonymous on Feb 14, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 7
   Name: Mike Mackovjak on Feb 14, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 8
   Name: Ian Berger on Feb 14, 2013

   Comments: they should trust in their US relationships to drive there. business from a sales and support stance. I do know of any benefit they serve cross selling with all the current suppliers . I also don't have any success stories a cross industries whee Chinese co panties have done that.

   Flag
9. 9
   Name: Geri Skop on Feb 14, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 10
    Name: Barney Skop on Feb 14, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 11
    Name: Gary N. Vaccariello on Feb 14, 2013

    Comments: I am an Independent Distributor of the Electronic Cigarette and deeply disturbed that many Chinese manufacturers are flooding our trade shows.

    Flag
12. 12
    Name: KAREN GRANT on Feb 14, 2013

    Comments: STOP THIS FROM HAPPENING & KEEP THIS AMERICAN!

    Flag
13. 13
    Name: Karen Jones on Feb 14, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 14
    Name: Pamela Montigny on Feb 15, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 15
    Name: Brian L Beebe on Feb 15, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 16
    Name: Rob Klotzbach on Feb 15, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 17
    Name: Nancy Proverb on Feb 15, 2013

    Comments: I am not in favor of our Chinese manufacturers going to trade shows and circumventing us.

    Flag
18. 18
    Name: George W. Lee on Feb 15, 2013

    Comments: E-cig distributor

    Flag
19. 19
    Name: Paul Sloman on Feb 16, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 20
    Name: Paul Sloman on Feb 16, 2013

    Comments: i am an e-cig distributor and not in favor of our Chinese manufacturers going to trade shows and circumventing us.

    Flag
21. 21
    Name: Anders Karlsson on Feb 16, 2013

    Comments: Lets be fair and have ethics. Mr Chinese........

    Flag
22. 22
    Name: Stephen Gabriel on Feb 17, 2013

    Comments: I am an E-Cig distributor and I am NOT in favor of Chinese manufacturers going to trade shows and circumventing us. Please do not allow this.

    Flag
23. 23
    Name: Tom Kurtik on Feb 17, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 24
    Name: Wes Wheelock on Feb 17, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 25
    Name: Brian Bush on Feb 17, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 26
    Name: Robert E King on Feb 18, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 27
    Name: Robert Mortensen on Feb 19, 2013

    Comments: As a small e-cig distributor, we have many dollars & hours invested in promoting our particular brands of e-cigs and are angry that Chinese manufacturers are attempting to circumvent our efforts by offering a direct go-to source for our customers! Please help! Thank you.

    Flag
28. 28
    Name: Sam Sugura CEO NEXgenSmoke.com on Feb 23, 2013

    Comments: Manufactures have done a great deal of dilution to our distribution over the past couple years. Attending our trade shows, sending emails soliciting our current wholesale accounts. It would be greatly appreciated if they were to stop selling directly to our accounts that we have worked so hard to acquire. We have spend a lot of resources getting our accounts and for our suppliers to circumvent is absolutely absurd! It's one thing for our wholesale accounts to find our suppliers and go direct, but it's absolutely WRONG on all levels for manufactures to go directly to our accounts. At the end of the day they are buying from them anyways!

    Flag
29. 29
    Name: Eddy on Mar 7, 2013

    Comments: Hey Guys!!!!Just found you by chance panyilg with our new IPad. We're planning to head for the Baja early in the New Year. Like you we're not going to set an itinerary, so who knows, maybe we can cross paths. We're really pleased to hear that you're out there following your dream at you tender age!Cheers, Doug &Bonny

    Flag
30. 30
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 9, 2013

    Comments: Officials said there were enough of those red soles to add up to a suggested retail value of $18 million, an unbelievable profit.The original shoe is made in Italy,” said chief CBP officer Guillermina Escobar. “Once we saw it was coming in from China, we knew there was a problem with the shipment.Officials took pictures of the shoes and consulted with the trademark holder to authenticate the shoe. Once they learned they were counterfeit, the hot commodities were taken off the black market and placed into the border patrol’s possession.Had the shoes slipped through the cracks, Escobar said, they would likely have been sold on illegitimate websites and underground outlets, some of which may fail to mention the shoes are counterfeits. christian louboutin shoes uk http://welikesexyshoes.webstarts.com/

    Flag
31. 31
    Name: Gdlrzichlgg on Mar 9, 2013

    Comments: yPAggb , komqhgjohhxo, vcnuhscdlnps, http://inwkfhodmwlb.com/

    Flag
32. 32
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 10, 2013

    Comments: The U.S. Appeals Court in Manhattan ruled today that Louboutin’s red sole is entitled to limited trademark protection, extending only to a red lacquered outer sole that contrasts with the color of the rest of the shoe and not to shoes that are monochromatically red. The judges affirmed the lower court’s denial of the injunction against Yves Saint Laurent and sent the case back to the trial judge. cheap red bottom shoes http://buyredbottomshoes.webs.com/

    Flag
33. 33
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 10, 2013

    Comments: The original shoe is made in Italy,” said chief CBP officer Guillermina Escobar. “Once we saw it was coming in from China, we knew there was a problem with the shipment.”Officials took pictures of the shoes and consulted with the trademark holder to authenticate the shoe. Once they learned they were counterfeit, the hot commodities were taken off the black market and placed into the border patrol’s possession. christian louboutin heels http://cheapchristianlouboutinsus.webs.com/

    Flag
34. 34
    Name: Nvvtratxctd on Mar 11, 2013

    Comments: wpoUax , kplvpkbxawge, pdncpotbflkw, http://emnmvvlcwqyk.com/

    Flag
35. 35
    Name: Nvvtratxctd on Mar 11, 2013

    Comments: wpoUax , kplvpkbxawge, pdncpotbflkw, http://emnmvvlcwqyk.com/

    Flag
36. 36
    Name: Hloodhxrw on Apr 1, 2013

    Comments: G0Zg8Y ukyshziqxczo, rsatlhptapog, jtykqytoxfuq, http://kboatdrzjcpv.com/

    Flag
37. 37
    Name: Eviygeuhya on May 17, 2013

    Comments: WBlmaX uqpugpqfaihd, vwyutgshobrz, usjappybfmsv, http://ijwxlshxdpyf.com/

    Flag
38. 38
    Name: Thxetojqea on May 20, 2013

    Comments: DpLMRs wivsdaqpjegj, tdmdicjudbmq, gadbzlakoojq, http://tplmybsaskks.com/

    Flag

Page: 1