Signatures 130 total
- 1
- 2
- 3
-
4
Name: Theodore Seeber on May 15, 2009Comments: There is no way that a parody is a substitute for the original. The idea that just because the music is the same means it is not a parody under the law is ludicrous at best.Flag
- 5
-
6
Name: Anonymous on May 15, 2009Comments: No comment is really needed here, the law is being ignored by greedy idiots in the music industry and someone needs to set them straight again.Flag
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
-
21
Name: Leigh Beadon on May 15, 2009Comments: I hope the people at ASCAP understand what message this sends to music fans: that your organization is opposed to creativity. I am aware of the many arguments as to why you feel you promote creativity, but they are fallacious and misleading. Sadly, disputes in this world are settled with expensive lawyers, so you will probably succeed in your goal to eliminate all sincerity and value from the music industry. I can only hope that among you there are a few true music lovers who feel awful every single day for what they are doing to an art form - because all of you should.Flag
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
-
32
Name: Jaron Omega on May 15, 2009Comments: Wierd Al Yankowic....Cledus T. Judd.... Parodies are not illegal.Flag
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
-
37
Name: Dave Mundt on May 15, 2009Comments: Parody SHOULD be protected...and IS...except when the definition is twisted by the greed of the producers.Flag
-
38
Name: W. Scott Lockwood III on May 15, 2009Comments: I fully support BA Dave! ASCAP needs a reality check.Flag
- 39
- 40
-
41
Name: Mal Maloy on May 15, 2009Comments: Parody have been deemed legal already. Goddamn, this is BULLSHITFlag
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
-
46
Name: Douglas Garmon on May 15, 2009Comments: This notice clearly threatens the "Fair Use Doctrine." The ASCAP (and their lawyers) should go back to school...Flag
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50