Comments on Proposed INS B Visa Policy

Signatures 7396 total

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, ... 148 › »

1. 101
   Name: Shri Shetty on Apr 18, 2002

   Comments:

   Flag
2. 102
   Name: Anonymous on Apr 18, 2002

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 103
   Name: Abbout Rachid on Apr 18, 2002

   Comments: je suis algerien,33 ans,j'ai le bac+03 en telecms, ciliba. merci

   Flag
4. 104
   Name: Sam Bhaumik on Apr 18, 2002

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 105
   Name: Anonymous on Apr 18, 2002

   Comments: It will be difficult if one has to travel so far and spend so much only to get to stay only a month.

   Flag
6. 106
   Name: Prasad Dasika on Apr 18, 2002

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 107
   Name: Mary Kondaveeti on Apr 18, 2002

   Comments: This rule needs to be re-considered. INS is letting the terrorists have a sense of winning in their mission by changing the rules. Most visitors to US are not English speaking and hence they will have enormous difficulty explaining to INS officers, the reasons for their stay.

   Flag
8. 108
   Name: Shujen McLendon on Apr 18, 2002

   Comments: My father died one and half years ago. Since then, my mom has been living with us with B-2 visa and in good standing. The change of this rules created many family problems for us. It affects not only the life between my mom and me, but my children as my mom takes care of them while both my husband and me work from Monday to Friday. I'd like to ask the reconsideration of this rule change. Thank you very much.

   Flag
9. 109
   Name: Dattatraya Kulkarni on Apr 18, 2002

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 110
    Name: KILLOL KAMDAR on Apr 18, 2002

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 111
    Name: Anonymous on Apr 18, 2002

    Comments: It is not fair for the old parents who will be visiting us. They are not harmful to the nation.

    Flag
12. 112
    Name: Asif Sakhawat on Apr 18, 2002

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 113
    Name: Johra Nasreen on Apr 18, 2002

    Comments: 30 Day restriction will have great impact on our life. As most of our relative live outside US. The worst part of this rule is that the elderly parents can not come any more and stay with us due to long distance and huge travel expenses. Even conside...

    Flag
14. 114
    Name: Chandrika Shankar on Apr 18, 2002

    Comments: The new law will cause hardship to reunion of old parents with their children residing working in USA.Please allow the present period of stay continue.

    Flag
15. 115
    Name: Shereena Anwar on Apr 18, 2002

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 116
    Name: Jin Qian on Apr 18, 2002

    Comments: this is too much

    Flag
17. 117
    Name: Jj Qi on Apr 18, 2002

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 118
    Name: Ty Ree on Apr 18, 2002

    Comments: do not do this

    Flag
19. 119
    Name: Anonymous on Apr 18, 2002

    Comments: It is very expensive to come to this country. To just visit for 30 days would be almost lost of money. It takes almost 36 hrs. to get here, jet lack and so on. Normally, parents come to their children so they can spend some quality time and enjoy with the family, which has been aparted for many years. To spend only three/lest then four weeks with your grand children are not be enough since sometime you haven't seen them from years. And of course, visit at least few places while you are here !! If this rule is due to Sept. 11, I think a terorist comes for a day or a month or six month, he/she is only seeking to enter this country. Once, he/she is here. He doesn't care, if he is legal or not !!! I would totally disagree, if this would be implemented.

    Flag
20. 120
    Name: Ashish Verma on Apr 18, 2002

    Comments: This change in the rule for the visitor Visa is certainly a very bad step for the family memebers particularly elder people who want to visit their family memebers migration to USA. This 30 day visa in fact a biggest hurdle for the family reunion or other family realted ocassion. So please be considerate to provide the long term visa to the family members who wants to visit and spend some time with other members of the family who migrated to USA.

    Flag
21. 121
    Name: Lidia Zolnierczyk on Apr 18, 2002

    Comments: this is going to stop people from coming to the United States to visit this beatiful country

    Flag
22. 122
    Name: Deepa Vaidya on Apr 18, 2002

    Comments: I am in support of the country's stand against terrorism.But,I wish you understand the parents who want to see their children after years and vice versa.I would request the government to extended the visitor's visa to atleast 3 months.Thanks,

    Flag
23. 123
    Name: Rupa Gokina on Apr 18, 2002

    Comments: above 50 years, B1 visa period min 6months

    Flag
24. 124
    Name: Ram Indukuri on Apr 18, 2002

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 125
    Name: Anonymous on Apr 18, 2002

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 126
    Name: Yuvaraj Gnanasekaran on Apr 18, 2002

    Comments: I am planning to invite my parents to visit me, my wife and my new born. They would like to spend sometime with the newborn. And if the law permits only 1 month, it is going to be financially tough for me to bring them every other month here. This is my take on it.

    Flag
27. 127
    Name: Sanat Shetty on Apr 18, 2002

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 128
    Name: Shuang Mu Jin on Apr 18, 2002

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 129
    Name: Pavani Nandagiri on Apr 18, 2002

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 130
    Name: Raju Mumbaivala on Apr 18, 2002

    Comments: I don't support this idea of issuing B 2 visa to our parents for only 30 days.

    Flag
31. 131
    Name: Pankaj Dani on Apr 18, 2002

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 132
    Name: Jaideep Bedi on Apr 18, 2002

    Comments: At least parents and brothers/sisters of US residents should be given some more time

    Flag
33. 133
    Name: Srinath Potlapalli on Apr 18, 2002

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 134
    Name: Anonymous on Apr 18, 2002

    Comments: The proposed amendment to the visitor visa would tremendously affect our parents, who spend so much time and money so they can spend some quality time with us. The INS should use better screening procedures and not target everyone indiscriminately. Also, under the proposed amendment, reasons for filing for an extension will not be applicable in most cases (especially when the trips are undertaken purely to visit family and friends who are spread out around the country) and the fact that processing of I-539 takes between 120-180 days (VSC) doesn't make much sense. INS is going to be overwhelmed with paper work.

    Flag
35. 135
    Name: Ananya Potlapalli on Apr 18, 2002

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 136
    Name: Kusuma Madhavaram on Apr 18, 2002

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 137
    Name: Xuejing Gu on Apr 18, 2002

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 138
    Name: Satish Cherukumalli on Apr 18, 2002

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 139
    Name: BIMAL JHAVERI on Apr 18, 2002

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 140
    Name: Mahesh Panchwagh on Apr 18, 2002

    Comments: This is Unfair low. For some few terrorist , all remaining old and needy people are suffering and 30 days is too less. Better Do not give B1/B2 visa at all. Definately it is going to affect Economy very much.

    Flag
41. 141
    Name: Varani Illayathambi on Apr 18, 2002

    Comments: 30 day visit will not be benificial for both sides. People visiting their loved ones from far away will be affected. Moreover, it will not help security in any way and will reduce tourism in the U.S. Canada will benifit by this!

    Flag
42. 142
    Name: Gaurav Sharma on Apr 18, 2002

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 143
    Name: Anish George on Apr 18, 2002

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 144
    Name: Venu Iyer on Apr 18, 2002

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 145
    Name: Jos EO on Apr 18, 2002

    Comments: It needs to be atleast 3 months instead of 1 month

    Flag
46. 146
    Name: Santosh Kumar on Apr 18, 2002

    Comments: This is difficult to understand how a sixty years old grand parents can be a cause of concern.

    Flag
47. 147
    Name: Kishan Vanapamala on Apr 18, 2002

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 148
    Name: Varun Aggarwal on Apr 18, 2002

    Comments: I think the new rule by INS is not fair for the people living in US coming from other countries. Reducing time of stay will just mean less time with their loved ones.

    Flag
49. 149
    Name: Apurva Munshi on Apr 18, 2002

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 150
    Name: Sam Jones on Apr 18, 2002

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, ... 148 › »