Comments on Proposed INS B Visa Policy

Signatures 7396 total

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ... 148 › »

1. 51
   Name: Subash Pereira on Apr 17, 2002

   Comments: This 30 day rule can only cause hardships for people who come here legally. the ones who want to stay back will do so after 1 month as they did after 6 months

   Flag
2. 52
   Name: Sapna Kulkarni on Apr 17, 2002

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 53
   Name: Rajkumar Balachandran on Apr 17, 2002

   Comments: This proposal of limiting the stay to 30 days for visitors is unfair for law abiding legitimate visitors. This will drastically reduce the visitors from India who visit their sons and daughters. please reconsider the 30 day rule.

   Flag
4. 54
   Name: Jeevagan Narendran on Apr 17, 2002

   Comments: INS has to re-consider this 30 day rule atleast for old aged people visiting their kids here. We work hard for this nation and I think our parents deserve a better vacation. And this will only increase the number of applications to INS for visitor visas and extensions.

   Flag
5. 55
   Name: Krishnan Subramanian on Apr 17, 2002

   Comments: a blow to family values and social fabric of millions of Indians residing in US

   Flag
6. 56
   Name: Anonymous on Apr 17, 2002

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 57
   Name: Vijaya Raman on Apr 17, 2002

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 58
   Name: Pavan Gudiyella on Apr 17, 2002

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 59
   Name: Manoj Thota on Apr 17, 2002

   Comments: It is a great injustice for genuine visitors that just want to visit various places in US and spend time with family in a relaxed manner. It is very expensive to travel and for a lot of people it's just once a life time. A better idea is to follow stricter scruitiny while issuing visas.

   Flag
10. 60
    Name: Radu Buzila on Apr 17, 2002

    Comments: I do not belive that the urge to do something about the now widely known inefficiency of the INS should recklessly be rushed into decisions that , aside from not aiding the nation's effort for increased security, undiscriminately hurt law-abiding aliens. We are thousands of miles away from our parents and families and limiting their ability to stay here to up to 30 days almost denies us the fundamental right to a family life. Radu A. Buzila San Jose, CA

    Flag
11. 61
    Name: Anonymous on Apr 17, 2002

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 62
    Name: Cyrus J on Apr 17, 2002

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 63
    Name: Cyrus J on Apr 17, 2002

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 64
    Name: Pinki Dalal on Apr 17, 2002

    Comments: Its a big loss to us.

    Flag
15. 65
    Name: Raman Goplan on Apr 17, 2002

    Comments: This rule is brutal especially for immediate family members visiting their folks in US.

    Flag
16. 66
    Name: Zhen Long on Apr 17, 2002

    Comments: I'm from China. To live together with parents is our cultral tradition. So, every two or three years, our parents will come here for half or one years. The new 30 days rule will hit our feeling a lot.

    Flag
17. 67
    Name: Giri Chodavarapu on Apr 17, 2002

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 68
    Name: M S on Apr 17, 2002

    Comments: Hi, I definitely think this doesn't make a lot of sense for people who have genuine reason to visit US or want to just see different parts of the world. Also, its not fair for the people who want to visit US to stay with their children/grandchildren.

    Flag
19. 69
    Name: SRINIVAS TUMMALA on Apr 18, 2002

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 70
    Name: Nitin Velankar on Apr 18, 2002

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 71
    Name: Kamal Dasu on Apr 18, 2002

    Comments: I have an aged mother who makes the journey with great difficulty and 30 days is too less. She atleast expects to be with me for 6 months after a gap of 2 years

    Flag
22. 72
    Name: Rahul Shah on Apr 18, 2002

    Comments: What are you crazy for moving it down from 6 months to 30 days You couldn't even see the east cost in 30 days.

    Flag
23. 73
    Name: Jaganathan Jeyapaul on Apr 18, 2002

    Comments: I doubt if it will serve its intended purpose. Rather old parents visiting their sons/daughters this country would be affected

    Flag
24. 74
    Name: Hsing Wang on Apr 18, 2002

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 75
    Name: Anirban Singh on Apr 18, 2002

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 76
    Name: Aruna Gandreti on Apr 18, 2002

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 77
    Name: Nilesh Junnarkar on Apr 18, 2002

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 78
    Name: Deepa Anand on Apr 18, 2002

    Comments: We all bring out parents to the US spending thousands of dollars for their tickets to get them here. This new proposal is trying to make it such that they cannot stay here for more than one month. This is absolutely illogical. Please take back the proposed rule

    Flag
29. 79
    Name: Anonymous on Apr 18, 2002

    Comments: I strongly oppose the thirty day stay for b-2 visitor visa. -Ashok.

    Flag
30. 80
    Name: Dwaraka Peddireddy on Apr 18, 2002

    Comments: Do not make this into a law as it affects the lives of all permanent residents here and it will affect tourism also.

    Flag
31. 81
    Name: Leila Lehman on Apr 18, 2002

    Comments: Most of the relative come from a very far country. It is not worth it for them to pay a lot of money to visit someone in the States for only one month. The lenght of stay should be controlled by maybe having the person staying check herself at the local police station. In France that is what they do and if the person does not check in, they start searching the person.

    Flag
32. 82
    Name: Chakri Dev on Apr 18, 2002

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 83
    Name: Vanitha Narasimhan on Apr 18, 2002

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 84
    Name: P Ravi on Apr 18, 2002

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 85
    Name: Mohammad Islam on Apr 18, 2002

    Comments: A minimum admission standard should not be implemented which will create problems for elderly parents of the immigrants who come to this country to visit their siblings and spend time with their grandchildren.And also during the birth of a child a parents help is essential for the immigrants.

    Flag
36. 86
    Name: Sachindra Sinha on Apr 18, 2002

    Comments: 30 Day restriction will have great impact on our life. As most of our relative live outside US. The worst part of this rule is that the elderly parents can not come any more and stay with us due to long distance and huge travel expenses. Even considering their age, it will not be possible for elderly people to come and go within such a short period. This rule must have some provision for elderly people.

    Flag
37. 87
    Name: Girish Nair on Apr 18, 2002

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 88
    Name: Stanley V Enthu on Apr 18, 2002

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 89
    Name: Madhav Kasojjala on Apr 18, 2002

    Comments: The 30 days Rule directly takes away our basic Human Right to keep in touch with our Parents & Relatives. Older parents are no threat to the Nation.

    Flag
40. 90
    Name: Kannan Venkatasubramanian on Apr 18, 2002

    Comments: I request to reconsider this decision to limit visitors to stay for only 30 days. Even if ins plan to ahead with the 30 day rule, it should have exception rules for elder people and the parents visiting their son and daughters in US.

    Flag
41. 91
    Name: Ajay Gupta on Apr 18, 2002

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 92
    Name: Anonymous on Apr 18, 2002

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 93
    Name: Arvind Deshpande on Apr 18, 2002

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 94
    Name: Abbout Rachid on Apr 18, 2002

    Comments: je suis algerien,33 ans,j'ai le bac+03 en telecms, ciliba. merci

    Flag
45. 95
    Name: Harjinder Gill on Apr 18, 2002

    Comments: I am agianist the 30 day law for visitors.

    Flag
46. 96
    Name: Kumar Nayakam on Apr 18, 2002

    Comments:

    Flag
47. 97
    Name: Debasis Chakrabarti on Apr 18, 2002

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 98
    Name: Jagannadha M on Apr 18, 2002

    Comments: Please consider the plight of older parents with their children living in US and whom they want to visit. The cost of visiing itself is overwhelming and if the stay is for only 30 days, 99% of them can't ever efford that.

    Flag
49. 99
    Name: Ashok Shetty on Apr 18, 2002

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 100
    Name: Mahesh Menon on Apr 18, 2002

    Comments: I think this is not the right step which the INS is planning to take, the corrective steps would be to track the people who have overstayed rather than causing inconvenience to people who don't have any intention to overstay or cause any problems to U.S. The more they stay the better impact it will be on the economy as they are going to spend on that too....

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ... 148 › »