STOP THE B4368 ROAD CLOSURE

Signatures 72 total

Page: 1, 2

1. 1
   Name: Terry Teeman on Dec 24, 2006

   Comments: Just another council tax payer that gets nothing for his

   Flag
2. 2
   Name: Anonymous on Dec 25, 2006

   Comments: I suggest we bill the Council for the exta time and travel costs at the sme rates as councillor expenses

   Flag
3. 3
   Name: Anonymous on Dec 25, 2006

   Comments: I am sick to death of this bloody council. Screw our lives up and charge us for it!!!!!

   Flag
4. 4
   Name: Mike Longmore on Dec 26, 2006

   Comments: This is the first time I have head of the closure. Were I not directed to this site I would been none the wiser. I use the road nearly every day and a deture is not only an additional cost in fuel but also my time. I would also like to take this oppertunity to mention the state of the roads. Last August 5th 2006 I had a motorcycle accident at the section of road by Manor adventure. I shattered my collar bone and broke a couple of ribs and wrote the bike off.There was a trough in the road filled with gravel and a couple of potholes around a manhole cover that caused me to loose control. I had dated photographs taken of the area and submitted them to my solicitor. What was returned from the council was that the road had been inspected very coincidentally on the 4th of August and by the 8th of August the area had been repaired. At the moment it seems that a cursory recorded inspection is all that the council need to exonorate them from responsibility. I intend taking my action further any help or advice would be greatly appreciated I would also welcome a move to reduce the speed on the road, particulary through the villages and would add my voice to any such action. In conclusion I think I speak for the majority when I say that I am sick and tired of the inconvienience along this road with what seems like a complete lack of consideration and regard for locals and road users alike

   Flag
5. 5
   Name: C Smout on Dec 26, 2006

   Comments: same as usual no consultation between us the affected and those in office who make such decisions with no regard whatsoever to those inconvienienced.

   Flag
6. 6
   Name: N.s.pearce on Dec 27, 2006

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 7
   Name: V Andrews on Dec 27, 2006

   Comments: There was no notice of this closure and no chance for us to object. Maybe we should shut the entrance to the council offices without notice

   Flag
8. 8
   Name: Matthew Green on Dec 27, 2006

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 9
   Name: Neil Ward on Dec 28, 2006

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 10
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 28, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 11
    Name: Judith Dean on Dec 28, 2006

    Comments: Why, suddenly, has the council decided that this road is too narrow (see quote in Shropshire Star from Gareth Proffitt) to close half of it when I have driven to work everyday for what seems months whilst the roadworks between Munslow and Diddlebury have been able to successfully manage to use traffic lights

    Flag
12. 12
    Name: Colin Dowse on Dec 28, 2006

    Comments: Good luck to your campaign - these cowboys should learn to consult the local community first.

    Flag
13. 13
    Name: D Marston on Dec 28, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 14
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 28, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 15
    Name: D LEVERSEDGE on Dec 28, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 16
    Name: Alison Benbow on Dec 28, 2006

    Comments: Life in the coutryside is hard enough, no buses, no trains and now no road!!!!!!!!!

    Flag
17. 17
    Name: Roger Benbow on Dec 28, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 18
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 28, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 19
    Name: T Bennett on Dec 28, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 20
    Name: J A Price on Dec 28, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 21
    Name: Julia Thomas on Dec 28, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 22
    Name: Rod Dean on Dec 28, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 23
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 28, 2006

    Comments: Good luck with your petition. This road must not be closed.

    Flag
24. 24
    Name: Russell Drew on Dec 28, 2006

    Comments: This is just another thoughtless diversion created by some bureaucrat that probably never uses this stretch of road to commute. For the past 6 months we've been dogged by roadworks at some point or other on the Ludlow to Much Wenlock stretch, infact last year I decided to drive past the road closed signs between Munslow and Bourton and surprise surprise for the last 3 weeks of this road closure no work was being carried out. There is no need to close this stretch of road. A decent contractor could complete that amount of work in less than a weekend.

    Flag
25. 25
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 28, 2006

    Comments: TOTAL JOKE!!

    Flag
26. 26
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 28, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 27
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 28, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 28
    Name: Simon Bentley on Dec 28, 2006

    Comments: totally unacceptable situation! can be easily avoided! why do we pay our taxes!

    Flag
29. 29
    Name: MRS T.F PEARCE on Dec 28, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 30
    Name: MARTIN PEARCE on Dec 28, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
31. 31
    Name: Robert Povall on Dec 28, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 32
    Name: Katie Pearce on Dec 28, 2006

    Comments: this is seroiusy disrupting my parents business and livelihood. No thoughts of consideration was put into the diversions or local peoples interests. My partner also works in Ironbridge, and this will seriously effect his commuting to work! Over the last year a signicant amount of road works and traffic lights have already been placed upon this road, so surely the road can stay open with yet more traffic lights.

    Flag
33. 33
    Name: Matt Bennett on Dec 28, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 34
    Name: Glen Woodward on Dec 28, 2006

    Comments: Another example of the effect on local business's not taken into account by the local council, this time to the loss of trade by this closure, three public house's on this busy stretch of the B4368 would lose valuable trade, another reason for pubs to be put out of business.

    Flag
35. 35
    Name: Neil Patrick Linton on Dec 28, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 36
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 29, 2006

    Comments: Simply to quote "Health and Safety" is not acceptable. If there is a real reason why traffic lights cannot be used, we are entitled to know - otherwise let's have lights!

    Flag
37. 37
    Name: Marie Griffiths on Dec 29, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 38
    Name: Charlotte Denning on Dec 29, 2006

    Comments: I favour the traffic light option

    Flag
39. 39
    Name: Geoff Rose on Dec 29, 2006

    Comments: I travel this road daily. It is totally unnecessary to close the whole road for re-surfacing. Do one side at a time and use traffic lights as contractors have done for water pipe laying!

    Flag
40. 40
    Name: Philip Atkinson on Dec 29, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 41
    Name: Paul Williams on Dec 29, 2006

    Comments: we're fed up after two years of almost constant disruption

    Flag
42. 42
    Name: Louise on Dec 29, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 43
    Name: Eloise Solomon on Dec 29, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 44
    Name: Georgina Hodge on Dec 29, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 45
    Name: Marc Gaunt on Dec 29, 2006

    Comments: Its a joke, the road has had traffic lights controlling traffic for months now with little inconvenience to commuters such as myself. On this basis why is safety deemed to be an issue now in terms of keeping one side of the road open Why can't traffic contol vehicles be followed if safety is a concern so as to keep the road open but speeds to a minimum The issue is, how many members of the council have a 40mile commute each day Very few I would imagine hence its now issue to them!

    Flag
46. 46
    Name: Liz Lloyd on Dec 29, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
47. 47
    Name: J Griffiths on Dec 29, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 48
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 29, 2006

    Comments: 25 miles each way to and from work is far enough; to add another 20 miles each way for the sake of 200 meters is unacceptable!

    Flag
49. 49
    Name: Julie Pearce on Dec 29, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 50
    Name: Sarah Rouen on Dec 29, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: 1, 2