Power To The People

Signatures 134 total

Page: 1, 2, 3

1. 1
   Name: Ian Campbell on Nov 18, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
2. 2
   Name: Chad Fisher on Nov 26, 2008

   Comments: This is not right!

   Flag
3. 3
   Name: Ted Leonard on Nov 30, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 4
   Name: Helen Leonard on Nov 30, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 5
   Name: Barbara Wyllie-Pecora on Nov 30, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 6
   Name: Richard C. Pecora on Nov 30, 2008

   Comments: I own a 2.5+ acre lot that originally cost about $60,000, and would cost over $20,000 to bring power. What do you thing the possibility of ever selling my lot and recouping my investement

   Flag
7. 7
   Name: Domingo Chavez on Nov 30, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 8
   Name: Anonymous on Nov 30, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 9
   Name: Gary Stultz on Dec 1, 2008

   Comments: This is a matter of fairness and everyone should be concerned. We need the Corporation Commission to do their job on this one and PROTECT the rights of the people and the economy of our state from an unfettered monopoly power company.

   Flag
10. 10
    Name: Melissa Karner on Dec 1, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 11
    Name: Todd Wyllie on Dec 1, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 12
    Name: RJ Stidham on Dec 1, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 13
    Name: Nicole Fisher on Dec 1, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 14
    Name: Andy Klitsch on Dec 1, 2008

    Comments: It is unjust to place the cost on the land owner it not only drives the property values down it affects our entire economy.

    Flag
15. 15
    Name: Kristie Klitsch on Dec 1, 2008

    Comments: The current policy is very unfair and aids in driving the Arizona economy down

    Flag
16. 16
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 1, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 17
    Name: Rosa Pererda on Dec 1, 2008

    Comments: i want this to be stoped....

    Flag
18. 18
    Name: Paige Campbell on Dec 1, 2008

    Comments: I think that the APS 1000 feet at no cost extension should be reinstated as soon as possible. The extra cost of power extensions now being charged by APS is unreasonable and excessive.

    Flag
19. 19
    Name: Nicholas Campbell on Dec 1, 2008

    Comments: The policy needs to be changed back so the land values are not hurt further.

    Flag
20. 20
    Name: David DeLoera on Dec 1, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 21
    Name: Linda Wiles on Dec 1, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 22
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 1, 2008

    Comments: I so think the APS 1000 feet NO COST extension should be reinstated. Times are hard enough with everyone right now and to add that on the economy is a real problem for everyone concerned.

    Flag
23. 23
    Name: Charlene Tiffany on Dec 1, 2008

    Comments: I beleive the APS 1000 feet no cost extension should be reinstated. Having to pay an outrageous price to extend APS is not fair to the people involved. There should be a solution.

    Flag
24. 24
    Name: David DeLoera on Dec 1, 2008

    Comments: The APS policy on line extensions has personally cost me and my family our entire lifes savings, as we were unable to sell an investment property that was only 800 feet from the nearest power pole. When we purchased the land,electricity was not an issue, as we where well within the 1000 foot limit for affordable hook up fees,after the change of policy, I was qouted at 30k to move power,making the extension more exspensive then the land itself.After making a 800 dollar a month payment on the land for the last year, I was unable to continue paying on useless land, and had to give it back,loosing my 25k down payment and ruining my credit score. Thanks APS for screwing me out of my hopes for a better future.

    Flag
25. 25
    Name: Tim Davis on Dec 2, 2008

    Comments: I have been building homes for almost 10 years, and this latest policy stinks of corruption and greed within the Corporate Commision. Any small rate hike needed to continue the original policy is miniscule compared to the impact it has had on land/home sales in an already hurting market.

    Flag
26. 26
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 2, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 27
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 2, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 28
    Name: Richard Jutzi on Dec 2, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 29
    Name: Doug Maire on Dec 2, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 30
    Name: Lisa S. Davis on Dec 2, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
31. 31
    Name: Larry Donoho on Dec 2, 2008

    Comments: APS has taken away all of business since they increased all the charges! It needs to be stopped

    Flag
32. 32
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 2, 2008

    Comments: APS is taking advantage of the people. I wish we had a choice of which power company to go with just as we do with our phone and cable.

    Flag
33. 33
    Name: Sandy on Dec 2, 2008

    Comments: Enough already! The average familly is hurting as it is. We have to pay more and more every year and our income is not going up to cover the additional expenses.

    Flag
34. 34
    Name: Glendine Soiseth on Dec 2, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 35
    Name: Glendine Soiseth on Dec 2, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 36
    Name: Glendine Soiseth on Dec 2, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 37
    Name: Glendine Soiseth on Dec 2, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 38
    Name: Laura Nielsen on Dec 2, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 39
    Name: Mike Julius on Dec 2, 2008

    Comments: This new policy is unreasonable and is having a negative impact on our economy.

    Flag
40. 40
    Name: Cheryl Julius on Dec 2, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 41
    Name: Allie Bell on Dec 2, 2008

    Comments: As an advocate of the commercial real estate industry, the no-cost extension would be a large benefit to various present and future commercial developments throughout the state. Many projects will be held or abandoned if the no-cost extension is not reinstated.

    Flag
42. 42
    Name: Lisa Julius on Dec 2, 2008

    Comments: My family has been involved in the construction business, and this has negatively impacted the industry

    Flag
43. 43
    Name: Mark Julius on Dec 2, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 44
    Name: Delores Soiseth on Dec 2, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 45
    Name: Keith Soiseth on Dec 2, 2008

    Comments: I bought some property in the phoenix area with the intention of building in the future. With the cost of bringing power to this property today this is no longer a option.

    Flag
46. 46
    Name: David Bourland on Dec 2, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
47. 47
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 2, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 48
    Name: Charles Stuart on Dec 2, 2008

    Comments: what they are not looking at is the fact that by raising those costs, the larger developers who are trying to stay level by selling small pieces of property cannot sell the land because no one wants to buy land that they have to invest another 4K in simply to get power. The big developer therefore has no cash to use to keep the bigger projects afloat, thereby cancelling out the big projects with APS. So basically by doing this, they will lose both the big scale projects and the small scale projects, which will in turn decimate their revenue projection for the future.

    Flag
49. 49
    Name: Ken Anderson on Dec 2, 2008

    Comments: Families attempting to enjoy and more rural lifestyle are being priced out of the market by APS

    Flag
50. 50
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 2, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: 1, 2, 3