Ardglass Wind Turbine Action Awareness Group

Signatures 52 total

Page: 1, 2

1. 1
   Name: Malachy Ward on Feb 24, 2013

   Comments: These proposed Turbines are too large and too close to homes and families.

   Flag
2. 2
   Name: Paul Innes on Feb 25, 2013

   Comments: These turbines are wildly out of proportion within the context of this rural setting! (or anywhere else for that matter!!!!)

   Flag
3. 3
   Name: Alan Fitzgerald on Feb 27, 2013

   Comments: Best wishes with the campaign.

   Flag
4. 4
   Name: Brendan Cahill on Feb 27, 2013

   Comments: If Wind Turbines are to be built on-shore, they have to be a safe distance from people's homes. Too close for comfort !!!

   Flag
5. 5
   Name: Margaret Rosner on Mar 2, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 6
   Name: Nicola Walsh on Mar 2, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 7
   Name: John Glasheen on Mar 3, 2013

   Comments: I am very concerned about the impact that the noise and flicker will have on the health of my family and that of my neighbours. It is particularly perturbing and worrying that current regulations appear to be dated back as far as 1999 and that decisions are being made today based on far outdated technical information.

   Flag
8. 8
   Name: Gary Stack on Mar 3, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 9
   Name: Sinead Sheridan on Mar 3, 2013

   Comments: Another location should be selected with less affect to neighbouring homes and community sites/walks.

   Flag
10. 10
    Name: Michelle O'Donovan on Mar 3, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 11
    Name: Jackie Cussen on Mar 3, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 12
    Name: Trish Ryan on Mar 4, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 13
    Name: Noreen Goodman on Mar 7, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 14
    Name: Dorothy Hogan on Mar 7, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 15
    Name: Dawn Murphy on Mar 7, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 16
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 7, 2013

    Comments: Wind Turbine at Ardglass is negative impact on our environment, our families and future generations.

    Flag
17. 17
    Name: Eileen Collins O'Donovan on Mar 8, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 18
    Name: James Fay on Mar 11, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 19
    Name: Angela Fay on Mar 11, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 20
    Name: Dermot Fay on Mar 11, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 21
    Name: Jennifer Fay on Mar 11, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 22
    Name: Sinead Fay on Mar 11, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 23
    Name: James Fay on Mar 11, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 24
    Name: Lisa Fay on Mar 11, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 25
    Name: Jennifer Fay on Mar 11, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 26
    Name: Sharon McKenna on Mar 12, 2013

    Comments: These proposed wind turbines are far too close to homes and health impacts are now clear. Their huge scale will destroy this landscape for decades.

    Flag
27. 27
    Name: Sharon McKenna on Mar 12, 2013

    Comments: These proposed wind turbines are far too close to homes and health impacts are now clear. Their huge scale will destroy this landscape for decades.

    Flag
28. 28
    Name: Brian Stack on Mar 20, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 29
    Name: Helen Gallagher on Mar 22, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 30
    Name: Avril Rea on Mar 24, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
31. 31
    Name: Aidan O'Brien on Mar 25, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 32
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 26, 2013

    Comments: Environment and People before Developers.

    Flag
33. 33
    Name: Anonymous on Apr 9, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 34
    Name: Ger Guiry on Apr 10, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 35
    Name: Anonymous on Apr 10, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 36
    Name: Clodagh Dunne on Apr 11, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 37
    Name: Helen Flynn on Apr 13, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 38
    Name: Dan Buckley on Apr 20, 2013

    Comments: Compliance with World Health Organisation guidelines on noise can be achieved by responsible siting of turbines at least 2km from a home. This has already been implemented in many other countries and we believe that Irish citizens deserve the same respect.

    Flag
39. 39
    Name: Dan Buckley on Apr 20, 2013

    Comments: Compliance with World Health Organisation guidelines on noise can be achieved by responsible siting of turbines at least 2km from a home. This has already been implemented in many other countries and we believe that Irish citizens deserve the same respect.

    Flag
40. 40
    Name: Dan Buckley on Apr 20, 2013

    Comments: Compliance with World Health Organisation guidelines on noise can be achieved by responsible siting of turbines at least 2km from a home. This has already been implemented in many other countries and we believe that Irish citizens deserve the same respect.

    Flag
41. 41
    Name: John Foley on Apr 22, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 42
    Name: Claire Padden on Apr 23, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 43
    Name: Brian Padden on Apr 23, 2013

    Comments: there is no benefit to this in the local community or to the country as a whole. it should not go ahead

    Flag
44. 44
    Name: Jacqueline Vivian on Apr 24, 2013

    Comments: these ghastly, hideous turbines not only make life hell for those who live near them ; they will destroy an area of natural beauty, definitely kill birds,( I suspect this is a flight path for migrating birds )d there are areas in the bride valley which are" protected" and they will destroy all tourism in the area.you should show photographs of the terrible distruction in areas of natural beauty in spain with 100s of these things - areas ruined- if these have to be put up they should be well out at sea I hope that you have joined up with groups wh o have prevented these going up in the UK i would be interested to know if it is a spanish company behind this

    Flag
45. 45
    Name: Steve Randles on May 7, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
46. 46
    Name: Michelle Kenneally on May 7, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
47. 47
    Name: Trish Ryan on May 16, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 48
    Name: Trish Neary on May 16, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
49. 49
    Name: David Neary on May 16, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 50
    Name: Rose Neary on May 16, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: 1, 2