Appeal to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh to amend the Draconian Section 66A of IT Act

Signatures 448 total

Page: « ‹ 1, ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 › »

1. 301
   Name: Sudhir Kumar on Nov 20, 2012

   Comments: I support this petition,save democracy.

   Flag
2. 302
   Name: Amitabh Pandey on Nov 20, 2012

   Comments: Police officials and Magistrate should be dismissed.

   Flag
3. 303
   Name: Abhishek Goel on Nov 20, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 304
   Name: Vinit Shriram Raichandani on Nov 20, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 305
   Name: Anamika on Nov 20, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 306
   Name: Ulhas Mahajan on Nov 20, 2012

   Comments: Freedom of speech should be protected at any cost!!

   Flag
7. 307
   Name: Senthil Ganesh on Nov 20, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 308
   Name: Anonymous on Nov 20, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 309
   Name: Ashish Kodalikar on Nov 20, 2012

   Comments: Wake up India. We need our basic rights to be intact.

   Flag
10. 310
    Name: Amandeep Sharma on Nov 20, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 311
    Name: Kumar Amit on Nov 21, 2012

    Comments: IT-66 must go

    Flag
12. 312
    Name: Venkat Praneeth on Nov 21, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 313
    Name: Sudhakar Swaminathan on Nov 21, 2012

    Comments: I was appalled by the oppression of "Freedom of Speech/Expression" in India, and this is the least thing India should forbid against its citizens.

    Flag
14. 314
    Name: Sudhakar Swaminathan on Nov 21, 2012

    Comments: I was appalled by the oppression of "Freedom of Speech/Expression" in India, and this is the least thing India should forbid against its citizens

    Flag
15. 315
    Name: Guruprasad on Nov 21, 2012

    Comments: section 66A of the IT act is anti democratic and unconstitutional. please remove it.

    Flag
16. 316
    Name: Guruprasad on Nov 21, 2012

    Comments: section 66A of the IT act is anti democratic and unconstitutional. please remove it.

    Flag
17. 317
    Name: Guruprasad on Nov 21, 2012

    Comments: section 66A of the IT act is anti democratic and unconstitutional. please remove it.

    Flag
18. 318
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 21, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 319
    Name: G R Vora on Nov 21, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 320
    Name: Ram on Nov 21, 2012

    Comments: it must go.. or else no freedom in India n young ppl start looking to go elsewhere.. will increase brain drain..

    Flag
21. 321
    Name: Anil Joshi on Nov 21, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 322
    Name: Shivananda Shahapur on Nov 21, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 323
    Name: Suresh Pingale on Nov 21, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 324
    Name: INDRAJIT BANERJEE on Nov 21, 2012

    Comments: I APPEAL TO PRIME MINISTER MANMOHAN SINGH TO AMEND SECTION 66A IMMEDIATELY AND MAKE IT MORE FOCUSSED SO THAT THE REAL CULPRITS OF SUCH CRIME ARE ONLY PUNISHED AND NOT CITIZENS WHO ARE AIRING THEIR OPINION ON VARIOUS ISSUES IN THIS LARGEST DEMOCRACY OF OURS.

    Flag
25. 325
    Name: Sriven Vikas on Nov 21, 2012

    Comments: The act is against article 19 a of Indian constitution. Freedom of speech

    Flag
26. 326
    Name: Sriven Vikas on Nov 21, 2012

    Comments: The act is against article 19 a of Indian constitution. Freedom of speech

    Flag
27. 327
    Name: Ritesh on Nov 21, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 328
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 21, 2012

    Comments: I want to live in India with pride, no fear and cherish the claim that we are a democrasy with freedom of speech so I can express my opinion which has no malafide intent without being arrested because someone doesnt agree

    Flag
29. 329
    Name: Gunasekar C Rajaratnam on Nov 21, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 330
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 21, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
31. 331
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 21, 2012

    Comments: How can we make progress without free discussions?

    Flag
32. 332
    Name: Arun Kumar on Nov 21, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 333
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 21, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 334
    Name: N.P. Singh on Nov 21, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 335
    Name: Arindam on Nov 21, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 336
    Name: Surinderjeet Singh on Nov 21, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 337
    Name: Sudeshna on Nov 21, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 338
    Name: Vivek Velankar on Nov 21, 2012

    Comments: I support

    Flag
39. 339
    Name: Raji Sumanth on Nov 21, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 340
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 21, 2012

    Comments: Someone maybe important to you but that doesn't mean you paralyze the entire city and make others suffer for it. One should have freedom of speech and opinion.

    Flag
41. 341
    Name: Rekha on Nov 21, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 342
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 21, 2012

    Comments: This is unthikable in a civilized and democratic society. This is not the freedom our forefathers fought for.The politicians of this country are holding us to ransom and behaving like dictators. People should come out and protest against such deeds.

    Flag
43. 343
    Name: Sujata Raye on Nov 21, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 344
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 21, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 345
    Name: Prabhakar Singh on Nov 21, 2012

    Comments: This act so brazenly covers all aspect of our views so as to implicate any person who is opinionating some one else as bad.Where is the freedom of speech.

    Flag
46. 346
    Name: Raymond Jones on Nov 21, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
47. 347
    Name: Ashok Gokhale on Nov 21, 2012

    Comments: Section 66A needs to be reviewed

    Flag
48. 348
    Name: Anita Kripalani on Nov 21, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
49. 349
    Name: Shree Padre on Nov 21, 2012

    Comments: This section is against the freedom of expression in a democratic set up and has already been misused on more occasions than one. Hightime to amend it if you respect democracy.

    Flag
50. 350
    Name: Avnish on Nov 21, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 › »