We Demand an Apology from Bill O'Reilly

Signatures 62 total

Page: 1, 2

1. 1
   Name: Mansur Gidfar on Jun 2, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
2. 2
   Name: Allie Mills on Jun 2, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 3
   Name: Simone Balog on Jun 3, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 4
   Name: Jessica Johnson on Jun 3, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 5
   Name: David Staggs on Jun 3, 2007

   Comments: Mr. Bill O'Reilly owes the many wonderful people of Boulder, Colorado a formal apology and that's all there is to it. Peace and Love from Muncie, Indiana!

   Flag
6. 6
   Name: Haley Thurston on Jun 3, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 7
   Name: Adam Jones on Jun 3, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 8
   Name: Kathleen M on Jun 3, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 9
   Name: Anonymous on Jun 3, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 10
    Name: Mason Sklar on Jun 3, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 11
    Name: Vivian Nguyen on Jun 3, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 12
    Name: Anonymous on Jun 3, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 13
    Name: Sarah Lokay on Jun 4, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 14
    Name: Anonymous on Jun 4, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 15
    Name: Conor Brown on Jun 4, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 16
    Name: Anonymous on Jun 4, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 17
    Name: Anonymous on Jun 4, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 18
    Name: Sarah Frankel on Jun 4, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 19
    Name: Amanda Gintert on Jun 4, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 20
    Name: Hannah Angst on Jun 4, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 21
    Name: Sara Arfmann on Jun 4, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 22
    Name: Patrick Garrett on Jun 4, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 23
    Name: Ramon Diaz on Jun 4, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 24
    Name: Keith Brown on Jun 4, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 25
    Name: Adriana Marmie on Jun 4, 2007

    Comments: Bill O'Reilly has issues.

    Flag
26. 26
    Name: Anonymous on Jun 5, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 27
    Name: Anonymous on Jun 5, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 28
    Name: Matthew on Jun 5, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 29
    Name: DEbbie Abbott-Brown on Jun 5, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 30
    Name: Jaclyn Best on Jun 5, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
31. 31
    Name: Anonymous on Jun 5, 2007

    Comments: if he can get away with slander for one event that he totally misconstrued, then America should sponsor cheating, not paying taxes, vandalism, stealing, and child pornography, because all of these actions are in my opinion just as disgusting as what he's done, and what he's convinced the public... remember kids: vote democrat in 08...and make sure it isn't Hilary...

    Flag
32. 32
    Name: Erika Yamasaki on Jun 5, 2007

    Comments: The controversy surrounding this CWA panel has reached an unnecessary climax and is still escalating. Many jump to conclusions after listening to the bias opinion of Mr O'Reilly, but fail to take the time to research accurate facts or read the full content of the "STDs: Sex, Teens, and Drugs" transcript. Those attending the conference are mature young adult high school students and many undermine their capability to filter out the unethical opinions of others. Students at this age have the ability to choose between what is right and wrong. High School students have reached an age in which they must build and strengthen their ability to decide and think for themselves, and this CWA panel only serves as an example of the situations that students will encounter later on in their future. If students are continually sheltered, they will not be able to survive in the real world outside the supervision of their parents. Although this panel may have been fairly one-sided, it is not the job of the school administration or the teachers to shelter them from encountering such view points. It must also be taken into account that a majority of the students had in fact, not attended the panel, for many teachers decided to hold class, especially as upcoming AP tests quickly approached. The opinions, whether they be ethical or not, were not heard by most students until Mr O'Reilly decided to exaggerate and broadcast his inaccurately supported opinion to his over two million viewers. The Boulder Valley School District has taken measures to prevent a one-sided pannel in the future as well as put stronger emphasis on the already existing option for students to opt-out from CWA panels.

    Flag
33. 33
    Name: Erika Yamasaki on Jun 5, 2007

    Comments: The controversy surrounding this CWA panel has reached an unnecessary climax and is still escalating. Many jump to conclusions after listening to the bias opinion of Mr O'Reilly, but fail to take the time to research accurate facts or read the full content of the "STDs: Sex, Teens, and Drugs" transcript. Those attending the conference are mature young adult high school students and many undermine their capability to filter out the unethical opinions of others. Students at this age have the ability to choose between what is right and wrong. High School students have reached an age in which they must build and strengthen their ability to decide and think for themselves, and this CWA panel only serves as an example of the situations that students will encounter later on in their future. If students are continually sheltered, they will not be able to survive in the real world outside the supervision of their parents. Although this panel may have been fairly one-sided, it is not the job of the school administration or the teachers to shelter them from encountering such view points. It must also be taken into account that a majority of the students had in fact, not attended the panel, for many teachers decided to hold class, especially as upcoming AP tests quickly approached. The opinions, whether they be ethical or not, were not heard by most students until Mr O'Reilly decided to exaggerate and broadcast his inaccurately supported opinion to his over two million viewers. The Boulder Valley School District has taken measures to prevent a one-sided pannel in the future as well as put stronger emphasis on the already existing option for students to opt-out from CWA panels.

    Flag
34. 34
    Name: Will Yates on Jun 5, 2007

    Comments: If Mr. O'Reilly were any kind of journalist, he'd read the transcript and understand how horribly those clips have been taken out of context. The Factor's reporters and producers have violated the privacy of School Board Members and grossly underrepresented the facts. Despite several attempts by people such as Mr. Kopel, he clearly has no understanding of the CWA. Many of the students at this panel did not agree with and some did not like that it was there. We are not all like-minded. But to attack the community of Boulder and tie this incident to things such as Jean Bennet Ramsey is tenuous at best. Boulder is a diverse community, not one of "liberal loons." Please, Mr. O'Reilly try to show some professionalism and own up to your mistakes. You owe it to your viewers who trust you.

    Flag
35. 35
    Name: Lindsey on Jun 6, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 36
    Name: Anonymous on Jun 8, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 37
    Name: Ian E. Roberts on Jun 9, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 38
    Name: Angie Gaffney on Jun 10, 2007

    Comments: Totally worth it... go Mansur and Patrick!

    Flag
39. 39
    Name: Alison Chamberlin on Jun 12, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 40
    Name: Tyler B. Brown on Jun 12, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 41
    Name: Angie Smith on Jun 12, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 42
    Name: Nick Bradley on Jun 14, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 43
    Name: Troy Williams on Jun 14, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 44
    Name: Savanna Summers on Jun 14, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 45
    Name: Madelyn M. on Jun 15, 2007

    Comments: Bill O is out of control. Do leash laws apply to pundits

    Flag
46. 46
    Name: Emily Downing on Jun 15, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
47. 47
    Name: Anonymous on Jun 16, 2007

    Comments: CU student.

    Flag
48. 48
    Name: Jeffrey Thiesen on Jun 17, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
49. 49
    Name: Emily Squadra on Jun 17, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 50
    Name: Nitin Shankar on Jun 20, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: 1, 2