| # | Name | Comments |
|---|
| 151 | Dennis W. Jowers | |
| 152 | Doug Powell | |
| 153 | Anonymous | |
| 154 | Matthew Pieratt | |
| 155 | Greg Schneeberger | |
| 156 | Scott Paul Stein | Graduate Student - Biola University |
| 157 | Nancy A Almodovar | It is the right of schools, esp. religious organizations, to be allowed to make their own policy as to their staff. To ban them from advertising is usurping the authority APA has. |
| 158 | Ronnie P. Campbell Jr. | |
| 159 | Mike Caba | |
| 160 | R. Keith Loftin | |
| 161 | Scott B. Key | |
| 162 | Tad A Davis | |
| 163 | J. Russell Reaves | |
| 164 | TImothy Shaun Price | MA, MDiv, ThM Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary
MA North Carolina Central University |
| 165 | Christopher Ullman | |
| 166 | Jim A. Stewart | |
| 167 | Ben Kimmell | Grad student - Florida State University |
| 168 | Dr. Ron J. Bigalke Jr. | |
| 169 | GArey B. Spradley | |
| 170 | Richard Whiting | What irony that professional philosophers would object to "discrimination" in the best sense of the word (i.e., the morally grounded repudiation of a morally objectionable act) by embracing discrimination in the worst sense of the word (i.e., prejudicial bias against societies holding a particular religious view). |
| 171 | Glen Stancik | |
| 172 | Matt Roberts | |
| 173 | Ronald F. Marshall | |
| 174 | Gayne John Anacker | |
| 175 | Curt R. Craton | It is self-evident that a moral position against certain behavior (homosexual or otherwise) does not constitute discrimination against those who choose to engage in such behavior. |
| 176 | Kelvin Jones, Ph.D. | |
| 177 | Randy W. Rodden | |
| 178 | Eric Gorsuch | |
| 179 | Brent Cunningham | |
| 180 | William Halych |
| 181 | Mark D. Sadler | |
| 182 | S. Alan Corlew | As an independent philosopher, II find it unconscionable that those who wield power in the APA would seek to silence and thus marginalize voices that speak from a different perspective. |
| 183 | Michael D Brown | |
| 184 | Petroc Willey | |
| 185 | Corey Emory | |
| 186 | Anonymous | |
| 187 | Anonymous | |
| 188 | Victor Deaton |
| 189 | Dave Sterrett | |
| 190 | Robert Francis Allen | Wheaton has every right deny employment to those who would violate or advocate the violation of the Biblical injunctions against homosexuality. |
| 191 | James Manuel | |
| 192 | Jamie Hellewell | |
| 193 | Stephanie Eichenberger | |
| 194 | Dennis Plaisted | |
| 195 | Mark Young | |
| 196 | Stephen E. Parrish | |
| 197 | RJ Snell | |
| 198 | Bruce A. Little | |
| 199 | Winfried Corduan | The policy proposed by its advocates would, in fact, be an act of discrimination, favoring those who share their view. It seriously curtails the freedom of those institutions who treasure their religious heritage over the conveniences brought about by the APA, and it would hurt the APA more in the long run than implementing this amputative policy. Remember that any action restricting freedom in any one direction, once conceded, eventually restricts the freedom in both directions. To demand that you must not do X, frequently leads to the obligation that you must do non-X. To stigmatize your supposed opponents means to stigmatize yourself as one in opposition to them. It is best to err on the side of freedom for all and let traditionally religious institutions maintain their practices without those who are advocating the proposed practice branding themselves as preferring a specific view on morality to moral freedom for all. Let institution A hire anyone regardless of their orientation; let institution B restrict its hiring to those who serve best its constituency. It is in diversity that we are best off. |
| 200 | Gary S. Elkins | Professor of Philosophy
School of Arts and Sciences
Toccoa Falls College |