Signatures 24 total
Page: 1
-
1
Name: Trevor Burley on Dec 7, 2006Comments: I was there at this incident, what was done was wrong and Andy has ended up paying for it in the cover up...The fact that there was no reason's given makes it worse. TrevFlag
-
2
Name: Ashley Davis on Dec 7, 2006Comments: Was there, witnessed the whole thing and am appalled at the current outcome.Flag
-
3
Name: Rob Turnbull on Dec 7, 2006Comments: Deplorable action that requires immediate remediation.Flag
-
4
Name: Thomas Shapland on Dec 7, 2006Comments: Barking mad, makes a mockery of any BMFA rules, I'm sure the organisations insurance company would not have been too impressed.Flag
-
5
Name: Chris Barrow on Dec 7, 2006Comments: I am a BMFA member and totally disgraced by this,the model was clearly assembled and tested at the show which the BMFA themselves prohibit.. Totally corrupt organisation,Flag
-
6
Name: Brian.daniels on Dec 7, 2006Comments:Flag
-
7
Name: Steven Chamberlain on Dec 7, 2006Comments: re-instate Andy .....((bmfa got it wrong..Flag
-
8
Name: Abyiss on Dec 7, 2006Comments: . its wrong,,bmfa are in the wrong here..BANG OUT OF ORDER..Flag
-
9
Name: Chris Mussett on Dec 7, 2006Comments: A disgraceful outcome that spoils the hobby.Flag
-
10
Name: Ramsay Herbert on Dec 7, 2006Comments: Typical of the BMFA!! This should be stopped!Flag
-
11
Name: Adrian Law on Dec 7, 2006Comments: disgraceful behavour. demoting a ACE because it spoke out about somebody being unsafe.Flag
-
12
Name: Mike Hyde on Dec 7, 2006Comments: too pompus and too far out of touch. Get realFlag
-
13
Name: Jamie Mckeen on Dec 7, 2006Comments: this makes me not want to be asociated with any form of model flying. old men stuck in their ways thinking that they have the rule of the land will destroy the community.Flag
-
14
Name: Anonymous on Dec 7, 2006Comments: Name and shame the lynching mob that did this, And let them pay for there actionsFlag
-
15
Name: Tom Baker on Dec 7, 2006Comments:Flag
-
16
Name: Lee Francis on Dec 7, 2006Comments: So so wrong.Flag
-
17
Name: Andrew White on Dec 7, 2006Comments:Flag
-
18
Name: Peter Hillyer on Dec 8, 2006Comments: BMFA should practise what they preaceFlag
-
19
Name: Edward Mcathey on Dec 8, 2006Comments:Flag
-
20
Name: Anthony Jones on Dec 10, 2006Comments:Flag
-
21
Name: Anonymous on Dec 10, 2006Comments: Something doesn't smell right here: if the BMFA don't put safety first then they risk losing their good name. If there is another side to this story that we are not hearing, by all means I look forward to the publication of the minutes of the meeting where the decision was made to 'amend' the status of this BMFA member.Flag
-
22
Name: Dave W on Dec 17, 2006Comments:Flag
-
23
Name: Brian Patterson on Dec 18, 2006Comments: I can not believe our governing body can behave like this, If there is more to this story then lets hear it from the BMFA people involved.Flag
-
24
Name: Anonymous on Jan 7, 2007Comments: I am amazed to read the contents of this issue. For it to happen is bad enough, for the BMFA to respond as they have is disgraceful.Flag
Page: 1