Signatures 2654 total
Page: « ‹ 1, ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, ... 54 › »
-
451
Name: Angela on Feb 12, 2010Comments: This is awful for young womens self esteem!! I do not support your campaign in any way, shape or form!Country: United StatesFlag
-
452
Name: Natalie Daily on Feb 12, 2010Comments: I've never shopped at American Apparel because of the homemade porn look of the advertising, and I'll never shop at American Apparel until they stop objectifying women for their profit.Country: United StatesFlag
-
453
Name: Anonymous on Feb 12, 2010Comments:Country: United StatesFlag
-
454
Name: Angie Cates on Feb 12, 2010Comments:Country: United StatesFlag
-
455
Name: Charlotte Prozan on Feb 12, 2010Comments: How about an ad campaign with men wearing your underwear with frontal and sideways shots.Country: United StatesFlag
-
456
Name: Maya Brown on Feb 12, 2010Comments: American Apparel is using women's body to sell their products, and that's not ok. It's bad enough when paid models do this, but making it into a who's hotter competition is just gross. Rock on HGHW!Country: United StatesFlag
-
457
Name: Anonymous on Feb 12, 2010Comments:Country: United StatesFlag
-
458
Name: Laurie Norton Moffatt on Feb 12, 2010Comments: Your add campaign is degrading and unhealthy for the self-confidence and body image of our youth. I am joining the boycott of your company. My 17 year old daughter does not been to be acultured in this way.Country: United StatesFlag
-
459
Name: Bryce Covert on Feb 12, 2010Comments: When American Apparel started I was enthused by its commitment to production in the US and reasonable prices. However, since then your marketing campaign has become more and more sexualized and offensive to the point that I no longer have any desire to enter a store.Country: United StatesFlag
-
460
Name: Amanda Lund on Feb 12, 2010Comments:Country: United StatesFlag
-
461
Name: Sara Nicosia on Feb 12, 2010Comments: A sexual predator's paradise. This will only lead to trouble.Country: United StatesFlag
-
462
Name: Sarah Lund on Feb 12, 2010Comments:Country: United StatesFlag
-
463
Name: Dorene Marinese on Feb 12, 2010Comments:Country: United StatesFlag
-
464
Name: Molly Hawkey on Feb 12, 2010Comments: that sucks.Country: United StatesFlag
-
465
Name: Kathy O'Rourke on Feb 12, 2010Comments: Stop exploiting young girls by putting an end to this ad campaign NOW!Country: United StatesFlag
-
466
Name: Victoria Highcastle on Feb 12, 2010Comments: Everybody get's 15 minutes, right? Well, I have heard many things about this company, and have seen the low-brow back page ads on the freebie news journals in my city, San Francisco, for quite some time. Apparently, the company normally gets it's photo ops from the young, gamine and female employees, without any compensation, such as modeling fees. Also, the owner has been under scrutiny for various sexual assignations with certain young, gamine and female employees. Not only that, but the company claims all the apparel is American Made. But, all a said garment has to be, to be called 'American Made' is to be finally constructed, or all parts sewn together, in the U.S. Most of the other pieces are done in foreign sweat shops, and then constructed. Although this is considered legal by definition, let's face it, it is not 'American Made'. This is creepy and wrong.Country: United StatesFlag
-
467
Name: Jessica Eickhoff on Feb 12, 2010Comments:Country: United StatesFlag
-
468
Name: Heather Kennedy on Feb 12, 2010Comments:Country: United StatesFlag
-
469
Name: Claire on Feb 12, 2010Comments:Country: AustraliaFlag
-
470
Name: Billy DaMota on Feb 12, 2010Comments: This is one of the best ads I've seen. Erotic, effective, and if I were a woman, I'd be shopping at AA tomorrow. I will definitely buy my significan others some AA panties for V-Day! You could use a few more men to make it "fair" - but why bother - frankly, it's pretty freakin' awesome as it is.Country: United StatesFlag
-
471
Name: Hideo on Feb 12, 2010Comments: Hmm. Frankly, I think the AA ad campaign is pretty effective and relatively tame - no more risqué than a Victoria Secrets catalogue... Exploitative? They're selling panties and letting the customers play. My opinion is that they should even the playing field by including men. Would you feel the same way if there were hot males showing off their butts? If I were a woman, I'd be shopping there tomorrow. And I may even buy a few pair for my girlfriends!Country: United StatesFlag
-
472
Name: Bender on Feb 12, 2010Comments: Excuse me, prudes. Get a bloody life! Next you'll be railing against the Sears catalog and the bras and panties. What's left for a teenage boy!?Country: BahamasFlag
-
473
Name: Anonymous on Feb 12, 2010Comments:Country: United StatesFlag
-
474
Name: Natalie on Feb 12, 2010Comments: There are other ways of advertising then to objectify women and make them sexual objects!Country: United StatesFlag
-
475
Name: Naoufel Remili on Feb 12, 2010Comments:Country: CanadaFlag
-
476
Name: Anonymous on Feb 12, 2010Comments:Country: United StatesFlag
-
477
Name: Christina Grizanti on Feb 12, 2010Comments:Country: United StatesFlag
-
478
Name: Linda L. Klinge on Feb 12, 2010Comments: I am appalled by this ad. It is unbelievable. Don't any of your have daughters, sisters, aunts, mothers? Stop using this kind of exploitation it is irresponsible and sends the wrong message.Country: United StatesFlag
-
479
Name: Meg Levinson on Feb 12, 2010Comments: Absolutely ridiculous that AA continues down this path. I live in LA and remember when the huge plastered photos of a girl wearing nothing but a nude leotard and a black jacket so disturbed the drivers on Hollywood Blvd that it had to be taken down. Then - you hire a pornstar to advertise cheaply made, overpriced and poor quality clothes. Not to mention the personal offenses made by Dov himself. All this and we the consumer are supposed to believe AA is not about selling sex to idiot hipsters? Stop degrading women - stop insulting our intelligence and use the time you spend thinking up new ways to sexually harass your staff to come up with a better ad campaign and better quality merch. Or just fall off the face of the earth.Country: United StatesFlag
-
480
Name: Anonymous on Feb 12, 2010Comments:Country: FinlandFlag
-
481
Name: Kim Lofthouse on Feb 12, 2010Comments: Yet again women and young girls are being reduced merely to tits and ass to push one company's mediocre products. Bravo American Apparell, you've just told thousands of women that their worth lies entirely in their bodies and that they're not better than objects. How about you employ someone in your marketing department with a brain cell or two...or even more radically put some more women into the marketing department so that they can bring real intelligence, flair and creativity to your PR that doesn't rely on objectifying women?!Country: United KingdomFlag
-
482
Name: Toby Ford on Feb 12, 2010Comments: lame campaign.Country: United KingdomFlag
-
483
Name: Daniela on Feb 12, 2010Comments:Country: Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic OfFlag
-
484
Name: Patricia Goodrich on Feb 12, 2010Comments: Are you out of your minds? This is nothing more than the pimping out of girls and women. It's porn. It's disgusting. Get a clue. Use your brains and put a stop to this ill-conceived idea.Country: United StatesFlag
-
485
Name: Mariclare Hulbert on Feb 12, 2010Comments:Country: United StatesFlag
-
486
Name: Lacey on Feb 12, 2010Comments: I have never bought anything from American Apparel, although I was interested. Now I know for sure I never will.Country: United StatesFlag
-
487
Name: Claire on Feb 12, 2010Comments:Country: CanadaFlag
-
488
Name: E Hausler on Feb 12, 2010Comments:Country: United StatesFlag
-
489
Name: Devin Murphy on Feb 12, 2010Comments:Country: United StatesFlag
-
490
Name: Meagan Funk on Feb 12, 2010Comments:Country: United StatesFlag
-
491
Name: Ms Ali Gambardella on Feb 12, 2010Comments: Stop the insanity! This is harmful to all women! Your stooping to an all time low and it does not go unnoticed!Country: United StatesFlag
-
492
Name: Kathy Rogers on Feb 12, 2010Comments: This is utterly ridiculous. You are asking girls to submit porn shots of themselves online. Who made this stupid decision?? We will NEVER buy from your company.Country: United StatesFlag
-
493
Name: Joanna Brantley on Feb 12, 2010Comments:Country: United StatesFlag
-
494
Name: Maureen McLaughlin on Feb 12, 2010Comments:Country: United KingdomFlag
-
495
Name: Diane Swix Berry on Feb 12, 2010Comments: Completely unacceptable, irresponsible, reprehensible, unconscionable, and indefensible. Firings from the top down should begin immediately, and all the predators involved with this campaign should be replaced with human beings who understand what the above five words mean. There is no doubt in my mind that underage girls will be entering this contest. I hope the new face of American Apparel is the face of the CEO being hauled off to prison for trafficking child pornography.Country: United StatesFlag
-
496
Name: SENEM ZEYTINOGLU on Feb 12, 2010Comments:Country: TurkeyFlag
-
497
Name: Mary Taylor on Feb 12, 2010Comments:Country: United StatesFlag
-
498
Name: Anonymous on Feb 12, 2010Comments: You should be ashamed of yourself.Country: United StatesFlag
-
499
Name: Emma on Feb 12, 2010Comments: This is appalling and should not be allowed.Country: United KingdomFlag
-
500
Name: Catherine Marleau on Feb 12, 2010Comments:Country: CanadaFlag