Petition to Amazon for a Change

Signatures 855 total

Page: « ‹ 1, ... 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 › »

1. 801
   Name: Ruth Tillman on Nov 30, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
2. 802
   Name: Tanya Lees on Jan 22, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 803
   Name: Jessica Moss on Jan 27, 2009

   Comments: I use both negative and positive reviews to determine whether or not I will make a purchase. In the past, I have assumed that reviews were generally not subject to author complaints. I find the circumstances of this case unsettling, and will be hesitant to rely on amazon reviews in the future.

   Flag
4. 804
   Name: Jessica Moss on Jan 27, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 805
   Name: Jenn on Feb 9, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 806
   Name: Stephen T. McCarthy on Feb 18, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 807
   Name: Don Edwards on Feb 23, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 808
   Name: Krystle Lee on Mar 13, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 809
   Name: Anonymous on Jun 7, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 810
    Name: Michele Pieper on Jul 2, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 811
    Name: Anonymous on Jul 7, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 812
    Name: Charles Sona on Jul 16, 2009

    Comments: This is outrageous. Amazon, change your ways! Charles Sona

    Flag
13. 813
    Name: Anonymous on Jul 21, 2009

    Comments: So much for freedom of speech !

    Flag
14. 814
    Name: Anonymous on Jul 28, 2009

    Comments: This is horrific to consider that Amazon is doing next to NOTHING to combat these horrible & frightening things. In the DAM situation, what if a rabid fan tried to attack this person (ala the Jodie Foster situation) in order to curry favor with the author (The difference is that Jodie Foster never asked or implied that she wanted anyone to try to kill or hurt anyone for her. This author IS implying that she wants someone to hurt or inconvenience this person!)

    Flag
15. 815
    Name: Anonymous on Sep 10, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 816
    Name: Anonymous on Sep 17, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 817
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 30, 2009

    Comments: What happened to Reba was a shame, and she should be reinstated at Amazon with her full privileges; she should also be allowed to speak her mind on the board in any form, manner, or mode she chooses. Amazon should be ashamed for rebuking and banning Amazon from the Discussion Forum when clearly the author was abusing her privileges on Amazon to harass and intimidate a reader that dared post a less-than-raving review of her boook.

    Flag
18. 818
    Name: Vaughan Pratt on Nov 2, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 819
    Name: Ruthanne Reid on Dec 14, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 820
    Name: Uegpzewavo on Mar 16, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 821
    Name: Gxdpcbivs on Mar 16, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 822
    Name: Pmdoldzgsla on Mar 16, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 823
    Name: Cfbnctbem on Mar 22, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 824
    Name: David on May 16, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 825
    Name: Brakbarh Akenatoï on Oct 14, 2010

    Comments: This is what happens when HUMAN BEINGS start to rely way too heavily on AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS to regulate their relationships... So, what I ask to Amazon is the following : change your global politics, and offer a job to (a sufficient number of) HUMAN BEINGS to personaly examine any & all similar problems, one case at a time. And, please : stop that mono-neuronal behavior of deleting ALL the post of a poster when in fact only a few of his/her posts are outside the Amazon boundaries. (This will maybe reduce Amazon's profits, but annoyed & decieved customers will certainly reduce them a lot more !)

    Flag
26. 826
    Name: Twjjaucit on Mar 22, 2011

    Comments: Yb0bJ7 <a href="http://jfmjrvphutmm.com/">jfmjrvphutmm</a>, [url=http://akmofvnjkwtd.com/]akmofvnjkwtd[/url], [link=http://hjpncwtsmwpr.com/]hjpncwtsmwpr[/link], http://wryjxzyqmtjy.com/

    Flag
27. 827
    Name: Twjjaucit on Mar 22, 2011

    Comments: Yb0bJ7 <a href="http://jfmjrvphutmm.com/">jfmjrvphutmm</a>, [url=http://akmofvnjkwtd.com/]akmofvnjkwtd[/url], [link=http://hjpncwtsmwpr.com/]hjpncwtsmwpr[/link], http://wryjxzyqmtjy.com/

    Flag
28. 828
    Name: Catherine Dewbre on Apr 5, 2011

    Comments: As both a reader and a writer, myself, I find this absolutely abhorrent.

    Flag
29. 829
    Name: Eleanor on Apr 5, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 830
    Name: Carolyn Gwaltney on Jun 2, 2011

    Comments: Stop the fraud by Deborah Anne McGillivray and fellow authors!

    Flag
31. 831
    Name: Matt on Sep 16, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 832
    Name: Jennifer Ortiz on Oct 6, 2011

    Comments: Loyal Amazon customer, but bibliophile first and foremost. Amazon has become the Walmart of the internet, should be ashamed of their treatment of Reba, and should take their customers into consideration before choosing the side of an e-bully.

    Flag
33. 833
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 7, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 834
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 2, 2011

    Comments: I know this is a late signature but I feel the problem is still there.

    Flag
35. 835
    Name: Agnes Christanti on Dec 24, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 836
    Name: Catherine Christanti on Dec 24, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 837
    Name: Hendrik on Feb 21, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 838
    Name: Elizabeta on Feb 22, 2012

    Comments: to think that their reeivw might go missing, then they're less likely to bother writing it. ::Link Technorati Tags: Web Related Posts Confirmed: Amazon will launch DRM-Free music storePriceheat :

    Flag
39. 839
    Name: Ajit on Feb 24, 2012

    Comments: the oiiarngl post: What's an author gotta do to get a review The LL Book Review This entry was posted in Books. Bookmark the permalink. Trackbacks are closed, but you can post a

    Flag
40. 840
    Name: Marios on Feb 24, 2012

    Comments: 03/02/2010 at 12:51 amI agree, they sdhulon't be sold in toy stores anymore. The board actually comes with a warning and explains what could happen to you while using it.If anything parents should know better then to let there children play with that thing, it's not a toy and sdhulon't be treated like one.Those things are bad luck and nothing good ever comes from them.If I had a kid, I wouldn't let them mess with that thing no matter how much they begged / pleaded or even got upset with me. That thing will never see the light of day in my house. Or at all for that matter.I messed with one a while back and was lucky enough that nothing serious happened.

    Flag
41. 841
    Name: Microsoft OEM Software on Mar 8, 2012

    Comments: k2R4in Thank you for your post.Thanks Again. Awesome.

    Flag
42. 842
    Name: Microsoft OEM Software on Mar 8, 2012

    Comments: 7SIzW6 This is one awesome blog.Really thank you! Really Great.

    Flag
43. 843
    Name: Discount OEM Software on Mar 9, 2012

    Comments: iZ1loN Thanks for the post.Thanks Again. Keep writing.

    Flag
44. 844
    Name: Buy Cheap OEM Software on Mar 9, 2012

    Comments: qfzMBO I really like and appreciate your blog.Thanks Again. Cool.

    Flag
45. 845
    Name: Lele on Jun 4, 2012

    Comments: Hey thanks for your coitunbrtion. Firstly, did you mean 2010 or 2020? Secondly, while The Salvation Army hasn't engaged itself in any serious research, it has within its grasp the Creation Story, a story that suggests to me that earth and everyone, everything on it, is a gift that has to be handled with care. What do you think?

    Flag
46. 846
    Name: Hamza on Jun 4, 2012

    Comments: I thank the Lord for the healing of Michelle from her sregury. I thank the Lord for His provision and wellness that is taking place in her at this moment. I praise you God , for we are healed in Your Precious Son, Jesus' , name. I thank you for the restoration that is taking place in her body, and for her strength to restored. Thank You Lord for all this in Jesus' name. Amen

    Flag
47. 847
    Name: Gabriella on Jun 6, 2012

    Comments: There are a few issues at play here as far as i can see. We have the back and forth over wheehtr Google is unfairly using it virtual monopoly in search to unfairly promote Plus or wheehtr it is the other networks who are at fault for not stumping up the data.As I posted myself earlier: Google knows who we are and, wheehtr by explicitly linking it as an additional profile on Plus or by other means, knows our Twitter profiles. Given this and the fact it does index public Twitter data (most of it) then it would be relatively easy to return some related tweets/profiles in a search even if they are respecting the nofollow.The argument that Google cannot know our relationships on other services is not necessarily a preclusion to returning specific data in a social search. It could also be viewed as reinforcing the comments that Search+ is not interested in all of your world, only a subset of it.

    Flag
48. 848
    Name: Raluca on Jun 6, 2012

    Comments: Let Google pay for Facebook's and Twitter's data, and they gain prominence in seacrh results. Don't allow Google, you lose visibility. There's nothing wrong with that. It's just Google using their assets to promote their services. That's how competition works. It gets bad, though, when Google refuses.In the end, it wouldn't matter much, at least for Twitter (and Facebook). They've got so much brand visibility already, with so many products advertising their Twitter stream on those oh-so-many billboards. It's just a sad attempt on Twitter's part to capitalize on the bad press Google's having lately. Frankly, I don't see the point it's Facebook that will be most affected by these developments. But then, Facebook has Bing to turn to,

    Flag
49. 849
    Name: Deborah O'Neal Rice on Jun 12, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 850
    Name: Buy Discount Viagra on Mar 3, 2013

    Comments: 9Uy2Sg Great blog post.Really thank you! Keep writing.

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, ... 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 › »