Ain't No Hobbit without PJ!

Signatures 1502 total

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, ... 31 › »

1. 101
   Name: Rhea on Nov 20, 2006

   Comments: You can't do this! Thanks for destroying a few years of worth of dreaming and hoping!! I will refuse to see this movie if it ever comes out. Peter Jackson deserves this! Get it all sorted out and give it to him. I won't give up and neither will the millions of fans out there. We're not easily brought down. And don't forget, this means *millions* of dollars wasted. No seriously, thanks a bunch. What a sensitive thing to do. You have no idea how much this means to us.

   Flag
2. 102
   Name: Jason K. on Nov 20, 2006

   Comments: New Line, we know you want money, that's okay, but you have to be REALLY stupid to get rid of a director who created a film that CLEAN SWEEPED at the academy awards. . . that little film was called Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King. Just let Jackson get 'er done, you'll be thankful later, and the franchise won't lose credibility (Do you hear that Silmirilian More money for you New Line)

   Flag
3. 103
   Name: Anonymous on Nov 20, 2006

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 104
   Name: Teka on Nov 20, 2006

   Comments: Haven't you noticed that it was Peter Jackson who earned you 11 OSCARS! 4 From FotR, and 2 I believe from TTT. THAT'S 16 OSCARS!! Does that ring a bell Peter Jackson has brought so much to you guys!! HOW CAN YOU DO THIS! Bring Peter Jackson back. You know very well that he's the only one who can make this movie a success.

   Flag
5. 105
   Name: Bib Johnson on Nov 20, 2006

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 106
   Name: Dean F. Wilson on Nov 20, 2006

   Comments: I am severely disappointed at this turn of events. For one, if this goes ahead with PJ, we will always wonder what it might have been like if he had helmed the project. Indeed, if the film/s are not up to standard, the wrath of the millions of the fans worldwide will be swifter and more powerful than that of Sauron himself. I hope the various actors (McKellan, Serkis, etc.) decide to opt out of this until PJ is put back into the mix. The idea of The Hobbit without him and his team is astounding and disturbing, and if New Line goes through with this, it can count its DVD sales out the window, for one, if even half of the fans see the movie (there is much talk of boycotting). Bring back PJ.

   Flag
7. 107
   Name: John Hout on Nov 20, 2006

   Comments: This may do no good, but I am a lawyer, and this is the reason that lawyers and business executives are looked down upon in the manner that they are. So there is a lawsuit that has New Line as a defendant. Without a doubt the profitability of the Hobbit would be in the billions with Peter Jackson. Billions. This is the kind of money that keeps studios alive for years to come. I don't know much about the realities of the lawsuit, but I am sure that it is millions. Hmm, do the math New Line. Billions or millions. I have an excellent solution: if a New Line executive called Wingnut and said they were out of the Hobbit, that person should be immediately fired and politely escorted from the studios and a call should be placed that his comments were premature. Find a mediator to immediately resolve the lawsuit. Start production on the movie. If I were MGM I would also delay to cut New Line out of the picture if that is possible. The bottom line is any decision makers to go forward without Wingnut should be out of a job. The Hobbit with Peter Jackson would make well over a billion worldwide easy. Hobbit without It would be a loss. Go and ruin your studio if you wish.

   Flag
8. 108
   Name: Joseph Dunnigan on Nov 20, 2006

   Comments: PJ and WETA need to be involved in this... its just not right to have it any other way. Please settle the differences and make these movies the way the deserve to be!

   Flag
9. 109
   Name: Anonymous on Nov 20, 2006

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 110
    Name: PeteS on Nov 20, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 111
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 20, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 112
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 20, 2006

    Comments: I'm calling your bluff New Line.

    Flag
13. 113
    Name: Gwendolyn on Nov 20, 2006

    Comments: I'm disgusted with New Line. I have no other words. I refuse to see this movie without PJ.

    Flag
14. 114
    Name: Artie on Nov 20, 2006

    Comments: We want the LOTR team back!

    Flag
15. 115
    Name: Nikki Resendes on Nov 20, 2006

    Comments: New Line is doing a huge disservice to everyone, including themselves. I think they underestimate the devotion fans have to Peter Jackson. And the talent and passion that Peter Jackson has. The Hobbit is going to be a hard movie to make decent, and no one but PJ would be able to do that. I'm completely fine with never supporting New Line, they have made a huge mistake and are going to lose A LOT of money over this. I hope they regret it and decide to change.

    Flag
16. 116
    Name: Emily Lord on Nov 20, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 117
    Name: Shawn on Nov 20, 2006

    Comments: This is absolutly outrageous. Its not all about money you studio dimwitts...its about the passion. Listen to PJ.

    Flag
18. 118
    Name: Jennifer Lane on Nov 20, 2006

    Comments: For consistancy and creative singularity this film must be directed by Peter Jackson. I am not a epic film fan typically, but I felt that the three Ring movies were so well done and contiguous. It could only make artistic sense to maintain the same team.

    Flag
19. 119
    Name: Kelley S. on Nov 20, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 120
    Name: Tone C. Gadmar on Nov 20, 2006

    Comments: WE WANT PETER

    Flag
21. 121
    Name: Sammi on Nov 20, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 122
    Name: Lisa Flerlage on Nov 20, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 123
    Name: Orin B on Nov 20, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 124
    Name: Kiran on Nov 20, 2006

    Comments: I'm sorry to see this development. I had hoped the issues between Peter and NewLine could have been worked out, to allow them to work together again to make another piece of movie magic that will "fit" with those already produced. I hope there is still some room for discussion on this issue.

    Flag
25. 125
    Name: Shaun Cahill on Nov 20, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 126
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 20, 2006

    Comments: I would rather have Peter Jackson direct The Hobbit than anyone. Please strongly consider working out any issues that are hindering his involvment in the making of the film.

    Flag
27. 127
    Name: James Smith on Nov 20, 2006

    Comments: Yes!

    Flag
28. 128
    Name: Andrew Katsis on Nov 20, 2006

    Comments: Without Peter Jackson and his fellow crew, it simply won't be 'The Hobbit.' If it is made without him - and we force ourselves to see it - the only discussion taking place will be: "Peter Jackson could have done it MUCH BETTER." And it would be true...

    Flag
29. 129
    Name: Karl on Nov 20, 2006

    Comments: Don't be Idiots let PJ make the Hobbit

    Flag
30. 130
    Name: Josh Long on Nov 20, 2006

    Comments: "I read yesterday Peter Jackson's statement about being off the Hobbit project. I won't vent or send expletives your way, I was able to vent on online forums. I watched each LOTR movie 7 times in the theatre, bought all the extended gift set editions and spent thousands upon thousands of dollars on LOTR merchandise. I can tell you that without Peter Jackson and his creative team involved, I have ZERO interest in the Hobbit movie and will not see it, and so will many other millions of fans. Sincerely, Josh Long

    Flag
31. 131
    Name: Byron C. on Nov 20, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 132
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 20, 2006

    Comments: The essence of "The Hobbit" can only truly be captured by PJ and his creative team.

    Flag
33. 133
    Name: Chad Myers on Nov 20, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 134
    Name: David Stephan on Nov 20, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 135
    Name: Eric Webster on Nov 20, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 136
    Name: Elizabeth Soos on Nov 20, 2006

    Comments: How can you think people would want to see The Hobbit without Peter Jackson, Fran Walsh and Wingnut films involved It's completely stupid! If you're so all about the money than you'd know that just having Peter's name on this would pull in big bucks for you. I can tell you honestly as a huge fan of The Hobbit and Lord of the Rings books and the movies, me and my family and friends absolutely refuse to see it without him involved. Anything less than his vision is trash.

    Flag
37. 137
    Name: Wayne Batson on Nov 20, 2006

    Comments: No PJ, I won't go see it. Forget it. You cannot cut and paste the soul and style of a director with something like this.

    Flag
38. 138
    Name: Aaron Singline on Nov 20, 2006

    Comments: You can't seriously expect us to go and watch a second rate director with no where near the Tolkien lore embedded in his/her soul

    Flag
39. 139
    Name: Nephellim on Nov 20, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 140
    Name: Kari Snyder on Nov 20, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 141
    Name: Lor on Nov 20, 2006

    Comments: I can't imagine anyone but Peter Jackson and his crew making The Hobbit.

    Flag
42. 142
    Name: EJB on Nov 20, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 143
    Name: Joe B on Nov 20, 2006

    Comments: We need Peter Jackson. No other director would do it justice.

    Flag
44. 144
    Name: Elisa Valero on Nov 20, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 145
    Name: Michelle Carlson on Nov 20, 2006

    Comments: oh please please please don't make any Hobbit films without PJ and the gang!!!! Because, to tell you the truth, if PJ isn't involved I am not going to go and see it.

    Flag
46. 146
    Name: Rita Wong on Nov 20, 2006

    Comments: I am ready to boycott all New Line associated media unless the problem is sorted out and Peter Jackson directs The Hobbit and the Prequel.

    Flag
47. 147
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 20, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 148
    Name: Allison on Nov 20, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
49. 149
    Name: Dehaese Rémi on Nov 20, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 150
    Name: D Dunfield on Nov 20, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, ... 31 › »