Signatures 2579 total
Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, ... 52 › »
-
101
Name: William Kleinbauer on Feb 28, 2009Comments: My previous submittal did not show my comments. Here are new comments. Dr. Campbell and many other "Healthy Lifestyle" evidence-based experts reached the same conclusions on the "Optimal Nutrition for Humans." This education needs to reach our populace. Cornell needs to lead once again!Flag
-
102
Name: Theo Lee on Feb 28, 2009Comments:Flag
-
103
Name: Michelle Rowe on Feb 28, 2009Comments: Let Dr. Campbell teach this information! I am 55 years old and am so grateful to have finally found the truth of the information in The China Study. We have been mislead too long on nutrition and health - give the students diet and food information freedom.Flag
-
104
Name: Daniel Keough on Feb 28, 2009Comments: I appreciate the Administration at Cornell University in how you maintain academic integrity and the wishes of Ezra Cornell, in allowing "any person...any study" even if some of the course material is a concern of an industry group or of a sponsor.Flag
-
105
Name: Diane Spurlock on Feb 28, 2009Comments:Flag
-
106
Name: Julija Corbin on Feb 28, 2009Comments:Flag
-
107
Name: Sean Lunny on Feb 28, 2009Comments:Flag
-
108
Name: Judy Sangillo on Feb 28, 2009Comments:Flag
-
109
Name: Ying Ying Zeng on Feb 28, 2009Comments:Flag
-
110
Name: Lala Stone on Feb 28, 2009Comments:Flag
-
111
Name: Linda Vixie on Feb 28, 2009Comments: If it wants to be an institution of integrity, Cornell will reconsider its decision to discontinue this popular and useful course.Flag
-
112
Name: Vanessa Oliver on Feb 28, 2009Comments:Flag
-
113
Name: Terry Sullivan on Feb 28, 2009Comments:Flag
-
114
Name: Susan Star Paddock on Feb 28, 2009Comments:Flag
-
115
Name: Jacob Park on Feb 28, 2009Comments:Flag
-
116
Name: Karin Treiber, PhD on Feb 28, 2009Comments: As someone who has directly benefited from a plant-based diet in ways that the medical community did not address and as a former college administrator, I am appalled by the action taken to remove a course that provides an alternative to traditional nutrition information.Flag
-
117
Name: Fred James on Feb 28, 2009Comments: Give him his course back or give him a damn good reason for terminating it! Fred James Bellingham, WAFlag
-
118
Name: Christopher Slater on Feb 28, 2009Comments:Flag
-
119
Name: Mandarava Kumara on Feb 28, 2009Comments:Flag
-
120
Name: JC Corcoran on Feb 28, 2009Comments:Flag
-
121
Name: John Ambrose on Feb 28, 2009Comments:Flag
-
122
Name: Mary O. on Feb 28, 2009Comments:Flag
-
123
Name: Anonymous on Feb 28, 2009Comments:Flag
-
124
Name: Marguerite De Santis on Feb 28, 2009Comments: What happened to the First Amendment Why not DEBATE instead of SILENCE alternative viewsFlag
-
125
Name: Brian Hay on Feb 28, 2009Comments:Flag
-
126
Name: Anonymous on Feb 28, 2009Comments:Flag
-
127
Name: Denis Hay on Feb 28, 2009Comments:Flag
-
128
Name: Brian Samaroo on Feb 28, 2009Comments: Put NS200 - Vegetarian Nutrition back on the curriculum.Flag
-
129
Name: Nancy Wiegman on Feb 28, 2009Comments:Flag
-
130
Name: Neal Wiegman on Feb 28, 2009Comments:Flag
-
131
Name: Susan Ellis on Feb 28, 2009Comments: Information from valid scientific study, such as the China Study, should be available without censorship. Shame on you, Cornell Administration! Why this decision What are you afraid ofFlag
-
132
Name: Mary Cavanaugh on Feb 28, 2009Comments:Flag
-
133
Name: Don W Smith M.D. on Feb 28, 2009Comments:Flag
-
134
Name: Morgan Zimmerglass on Feb 28, 2009Comments: vegetarianism is a noble pursuit and Cornell students should have the opportunity to take this courseFlag
-
135
Name: Sheila M. Richardson on Feb 28, 2009Comments:Flag
-
136
Name: Elza Boycheva on Feb 28, 2009Comments: It is unfortunate and disappointing that a course on healthy living based on rigorous scientific research is pulled in such an unfair and underhanded way. Cornell prides itself for being a liberal institution, and yet this action strikingly contradicts this goal, and demonstrates that Cornell teaches material from a very biased perspective.Flag
-
137
Name: Mildred Siegel on Feb 28, 2009Comments:Flag
-
138
Name: Bob Crovo on Feb 28, 2009Comments:Flag
-
139
Name: Mary Thornley on Feb 28, 2009Comments:Flag
-
140
Name: Lesley E. Burlison on Feb 28, 2009Comments: What is it that Cornell FEARS This is the denial of truth in education. It is what I might expect in a communist country. Truly, this is not worthy of your institution. The course should be continued. In the name of academic freedom this points to fear driving those who made such a decision. We all can voice a sincere concern that " all we have to fear is fear itself."Flag
-
141
Name: Eva Rand on Feb 28, 2009Comments:Flag
-
142
Name: Ann Marie Roth on Feb 28, 2009Comments:Flag
-
143
Name: Justine on Feb 28, 2009Comments:Flag
-
144
Name: Anonymous on Feb 28, 2009Comments:Flag
-
145
Name: Ella M Blume on Feb 28, 2009Comments:Flag
-
146
Name: Deborah Forney on Feb 28, 2009Comments:Flag
-
147
Name: Trevor on Feb 28, 2009Comments:Flag
-
148
Name: William L Dodson on Feb 28, 2009Comments:Flag
-
149
Name: Jody Rasch on Feb 28, 2009Comments:Flag
-
150
Name: Mark Oldendorf, MD on Feb 28, 2009Comments: Dear sirs, I am board certified in Internal Medicine, Family Practice, Geriatrics, Clinical Lipidology, and Bone Densitometry. I have dedicated my life to the pursuit of knowledge. To hear that an internationally known University may be suppressing course content due to pressure from special interest groups is disheartening. The statements by Dr. Campbell give the impression the course curriculum at Cornell is designed to sell certain foods, and not others. If this be true, it is a sad day for academia. It it is not, then a public statement to the contrary would seem to be in order. Mark Oldendorf, MDFlag