Child support is a necessity however the amount of support the payors are required to pay by law is excessive. It should not be geared to income but to the payor\'s ability to pay and to specific amounts they can pay as well as the cost of raising a child.
The recipient\'s income must also be taken into account when determining support for children after all, they are also required to financially support the child(ren) too.
What needs to happen is a complete adjustment of the Child Support Guidelines. Take the total greater income and make each party pay 50% of the guideline amount for that income.
New Formula Should Be - For Example:
Payors Income is $65,000/ammum
Recipients Income is $20,000/annum
Payors income is greater by $45,000/annum
$45,000
1 child
Current Guideline Amount: $415/month
Take $415 and divide it in half and that equals $207.50 per month.
This sounds more reasonable than the payor being responsible for $415/month.
There is no accounting and proof requirement for how and where the child support is being spent. Most times the support is not going directly to the kids but is being pocketed by the recipient and spent on their own luxuries. The support should not be going toward the recipients partying, mortgages, owed debts, etc.
We are calling on the Government to review and change the child support guideline amounts or to abolish the guidelines completely and go back to the way it was where judges decided on a case by case basis what the amount of child support should be.
Please sign this petition and pass on the link to everyone you know for their signature. We need to make the system fair for everyone and soon.
The government continues to ignore the financial abuse built into our current system but this massive surge of support proves they cannot hide from the truth forever. We are exposing the parasites who exploit these broken guidelines for their own personal gain and the bureaucrats in Ottawa have no choice but to start paying attention.
Reached 100 supporters
October 1, 2008
6 Comments
S
Sarah Wang
18 years ago
Featured
It needs to be fair for both sides. I work hard and see none of it going to actual kid stuff.
M
Mike Cunningham
18 years ago
Featured
Finally someone is saying it. My ex uses the money for her new car while I can barely afford rent. This system is broken.
D
Dave Okonkwo
18 years ago
Featured
The courts are robbing fathers blind. Ridiculous.
A
Amanda Bailey
18 years ago
Featured
Agree 100 percent. The laws are way behind the times and need a complete overhaul to be equal.
K
Kevin Hale
18 years ago
Featured
Fix this now. Im tired of working overtime just to pay for her lifestyle.
J
Jason Mason
18 years ago
Featured
Why is there no proof of spending? If I have to pay I should see receipts for my kids expenses. Otherwise its just a paycheck for the ex.
Help this petition grow
Share it with friends to help reach
250 signatures.
Sign Petition
We never post to your account. Social sign-in is used only to verify your signature.
or sign with Email
Add a comment?
Your signature will be added via
.
Tell others why you're signing — it's optional.
Child support is a necessity however the amount of support the payors are required to pay by law is excessive. It should not be geared to income but to the payor\'s ability to pay and to specific amounts they can pay as well as the cost of raising a child.
The recipient\'s income must also be taken into account when determining support for children after all, they are also required to financially support the child(ren) too.
What needs to happen is a complete adjustment of the Child Support Guidelines. Take the total greater income and make each party pay 50% of the guideline amount for that income.
New Formula Should Be - For Example:
Payors Income is $65,000/ammum
Recipients Income is $20,000/annum
Payors income is greater by $45,000/annum
$45,000
1 child
Current Guideline Amount: $415/month
Take $415 and divide it in half and that equals $207.50 per month.
This sounds more reasonable than the payor being responsible for $415/month.
There is no accounting and proof requirement for how and where the child support is being spent. Most times the support is not going directly to the kids but is being pocketed by the recipient and spent on their own luxuries. The support should not be going toward the recipients partying, mortgages, owed debts, etc.
We are calling on the Government to review and change the child support guideline amounts or to abolish the guidelines completely and go back to the way it was where judges decided on a case by case basis what the amount of child support should be.
Please sign this petition and pass on the link to everyone you know for their signature. We need to make the system fair for everyone and soon.
The government continues to ignore the financial abuse built into our current system but this massive surge of support proves they cannot hide from the truth forever. We are exposing the parasites who exploit these broken guidelines for their own personal gain and the bureaucrats in Ottawa have no choice but to start paying attention.
Reached 100 supporters
October 1, 2008
6 Comments
S
Sarah Wang
18 years ago
Featured
It needs to be fair for both sides. I work hard and see none of it going to actual kid stuff.
M
Mike Cunningham
18 years ago
Featured
Finally someone is saying it. My ex uses the money for her new car while I can barely afford rent. This system is broken.
D
Dave Okonkwo
18 years ago
Featured
The courts are robbing fathers blind. Ridiculous.
A
Amanda Bailey
18 years ago
Featured
Agree 100 percent. The laws are way behind the times and need a complete overhaul to be equal.
K
Kevin Hale
18 years ago
Featured
Fix this now. Im tired of working overtime just to pay for her lifestyle.
J
Jason Mason
18 years ago
Featured
Why is there no proof of spending? If I have to pay I should see receipts for my kids expenses. Otherwise its just a paycheck for the ex.
Help this petition grow
Share it with friends to help reach
250 signatures.
Sign Petition
We never post to your account. Social sign-in is used only to verify your signature.
or sign with Email
Add a comment?
Your signature will be added via . Tell others why you're signing — it's optional.
Signing with Google or Facebook verifies your signature instantly — no email needed.
It needs to be fair for both sides. I work hard and see none of it going to actual kid stuff.