| # | Name | Comments |
|---|
| 1 | Chris | |
| 2 | Jo | |
| 3 | Thomas | AAC+ appears to be very promising for online music broadcasters, and i think it'd be terrific if Apple amongst others would get behind this in future releases |
| 4 | Greg | |
| 5 | Anonymous | DO IT |
| 6 | Anonymous | AAC+ has been around for ages now, Come on Apple. |
| 7 | Richard Herbert | |
| 8 | w | g |
| 9 | harri utby | |
| 10 | Michael Cahoon | Why not? Come on..... |
| 11 | IgorC | HE-AAC is standard |
| 12 | Neil | |
| 13 | Stan | It's so bad that iTunes is probably the only webradio player that doesn't support HE-AAC |
| 14 | Anonymous | |
| 15 | Anonymous | |
| 16 | Frank Seyen | As more and more webradios use AAC+ for encoding, iTunes is becoming more and more useless for online radio listening. |
| 17 | Sebastian Mares | |
| 18 | Borge Indergaard | HE-AAC (aacPlus) has becomed a standard. Quicktime/iTunes is about the only media players that does not support it yet.
Don't leave us Apple fans behind. Support good new formats like everyone else! |
| 19 | Marko Markovic | |
| 20 | dannywf | |
| 21 | Anonymous | |
| 22 | Anonymous | Allowing AAC would mean more $$$ as a higher rate could be charged for tracks encoded with AAC...... |
| 23 | Adam | Yes please. Better quality is always... well, better. |
| 24 | Simon S | go aac+, go! |
| 25 | Enrico | Why not include AAC+, it could be used in .m4b files, why not exploit this effective tecnology when all the rest of the players already have it. |
| 26 | ivan mahony | |
| 27 | Morgan Sutherland | Do it. |
| 28 | Nadine Al-Said | |
| 29 | bodo Peeters | |
| 30 | Louis | comon apple! |
| 31 | Brian Cruz | |
| 32 | Anonymous | |
| 33 | Robert Houghton | Do this soon please! |
| 34 | James P | |
| 35 | Kjetil | |
| 36 | Adam Kowalski | |
| 37 | Chris Hanson | Please consider implementing a decoder for what is more and more becoming a very practical and widely used encoder for Internet radio in iTunes. An even more useful, if certainly more involved and difficult alternative, would be to implement a codec plug-in architecture for iTunes. |
| 38 | Ivan Smith | iTunes used to (on Windows at least) support SBR/PS and low bit rate AAC+, or at least "get Information" used to show these files at such. Playback was at 44.1KHz - now on both Mac and Intel it's no AAC+, 22KHz and sounding dreadful. I now have to resort to VLC and Mplayer on OS X - Never had a problem with Foobar on Windows playing it either - so come on Apple!!!!!! It's the latest thing and great design - two things Apple are known for - what's the problem? AAC+ would fit nicely on those 16GB Touches everyones so concerned about - and then have to for a HD based Classic 80GB instead - missing out on the touch! (I know I sell iPods and the pain is there). PLEASE, PLEASE - APPLE - the PC and *nixes have had AAC+ SBR and PS playback and encoding for the longest time now and it's they way of the future in audio compression - I'm surprised Apple are quite behind on this. |
| 39 | Bill Gates | |
| 40 | William Penn | |
| 41 | kalle päätalo | iTunes needs aacplus !! |
| 42 | Anonymous | |
| 43 | Daniel Lillja | Plz apple, i can store twice the amount of music on my ipod and if the iphone has it i will buy one because i can fit all of my music |
| 44 | brent weatherall | AAC+ is a valuable codec that needs mainstream support |
| 45 | Anonymous | |
| 46 | Mats Thorburn | |
| 47 | Alec Ross | Quality is important. HE aac will really help. |
| 48 | Marcus | Doowit |
| 49 | Anonymous | |
| 50 | Rami Shaath | Yes, its time.. Please ADD the AAC+ / AAC Streaming feature!! |