| # | Name | Comments |
|---|
| 1 | Carolyn Smith | |
| 2 | Mike Shallcross | |
| 3 | Fabien Vaujany | |
| 4 | Peter Mudge | The plans are unacceptable because they do not include a suitable route for cyclists travelling from east to west. |
| 5 | Volker Eick, Germany | |
| 6 | Nadia Abu-Zahra | The King's Cross Railway Lands Group have listed some amendments to the current project that I believe would be very easy to achieve. These community requests should be met; it is the community, after all, that should be leading this, not a private corporation. |
| 7 | De Corte Stefan | |
| 8 | Iacopo Zetti | |
| 9 | Marvi Maggio | |
| 10 | Daniel Blumer | |
| 11 | Anonymous | |
| 12 | Manuel Lutz | |
| 13 | Jenny Künkel | |
| 14 | Sofia Roupakia | |
| 15 | Michael Edwards | This is the last chance to get King's Cross right fro londoners and the world. It is a microcosm, a test case. |
| 16 | Anonymous | The Kings Cross area has now the change of a century to built an utopian urban community where work and domestic life are completely integrated in one and the same location, where the new can be wedded to the old. The development will then be dealing succesfully with the ever increasing traffic problems, and will be profiting from all the social and psychological benefits of a well-knit society. Energy considerations should equally be adressed seriously by introducing the most avant-garde devices in order to become as much as possible reliant on local energy sources, instead of risking and getting involved in far away wars out of fear to go short on energy in the future. |
| 17 | Dr. Christian Schmid | |
| 18 | Andrew Inch | |
| 19 | Dr. Geraint Ellis | |
| 20 | shirley Pinfold | make Kings X aplace for famillies to live and work in. Not a transit camp. |
| 21 | Lynne Burnett | Any redevelopment MUST be designed to help the local community, not just to make money. |
| 22 | Daniela Wullers | |
| 23 | Stephanie Ellis | |
| 24 | An Descheemaeker | |
| 25 | Anonymous | |
| 26 | Knut Unger, Germany | |
| 27 | Simon Norton | |
| 28 | candy udwin | |
| 29 | Anonymous | Affordable housing, zero-carbon development, renewable energy (solar panels & wind turbines) please to go along with your office space because community comes first. |
| 30 | buchholz, tino | |
| 31 | Virginia Luling | |
| 32 | Sophie Talbot | King's Cross contains so many interesting and exciting sites of historical importance and I'd like to see it become more of a thriving community. It's housing, small business space specifically for cultural and arts/crafts based businesses and community benefits we need, not more offices. The Regents Quarter development has come to a stop because P&O made the mistake of trying to force too many office spaces in, Argent should not be allowed to do the same. |
| 33 | Dan Smith | |
| 34 | nicholas delicata | |
| 35 | Sarah Ward | |
| 36 | Massimo ANDREIS ALLAMANDOLA | |
| 37 | Arthur Graves | Lib Dem Councillor, Camden. Whilst this far far outside of my ward, I am keenly interested in it and would be happy to support your legal challenge. I fundamentally believe we are making a huge mistake if we do not get the March decision rescinded and ensure that the developers of this unique space are impelled to come back to the table with a much improved scheme of community based projects and decent amounts of homes. |
| 38 | Dr.ir. P.Stouten | Alternative plans that bring real generation need to be take in consideration including opinions of the inhatitants of the districts |
| 39 | Rick Harley | Totally support this petition |
| 40 | Deborah Berns | Evertthing that could be wrong is wrong about the current proposals. Dull, Suburban Mall type design with UNaffordable housing for singles prioratised. SCRAP the current plans and have an open architectual competition wth a people based brief! HOMES and COMMUNITY not "housing units" for upmarket drifters and especially NO casinos |
| 41 | Chloe McCloskey | |
| 42 | Rob McWilliam | For the sake of everybody living in this relatively deprived area,
please ensure that this developement becomes an intergrated asset to the community instead of the self-serving corporate monstrosity currently proposed. |
| 43 | Anonymous | more vision required!
current development too dense, average and generic. Rather higher buildings and as a result more open spaces on the ground level. |
| 44 | Timothy Burnett | A bulky overdeveloped and badly designed office city is not what Kings Cross needs. |
| 45 | Anonymous | |
| 46 | Joni Boyer | |
| 47 | Anonymous | |
| 48 | Thom Osborn | I strongly agree with all the items listed by the King's Cross Railway Lands Group. |
| 49 | anke jakob | |
| 50 | Cliff Ashford | The Kings Cross development could be a world leading carbon neutral village rather than yet another empty office block development. I strongly oppose the current design for the Rsilway Lands. |
