| # | Name | Comments |
|---|
| 101 | David Rider | |
| 102 | Anonymous | |
| 103 | Gregory McCue | |
| 104 | kathleen day | In addition to opposing the plan for reasons 1, 2 &3 above, I oppose it because of the secretive, misleading, undemocratic process that the Mayor's office and Mary Cheh's office employed to ram it through, without regard to the wishes and thoughts of the community. Shame on Fenty and Cheh for being in the pocket of the developers. |
| 105 | Joan Oshinsky | |
| 106 | Christine Marwick | The whole proposal is dreadful. Taking the Janney field is literally stealing candy from babies. And the idea that the library should be delayed any longer is appalling.
I notice that the DC Government guaranteed the bonds for the improvement to infrastructures at 2 nearby private schools -- Sidwell and Gerogetown Day. Those kids, quite properly, have terrific sports facilities now.
But why should DCPS kids have so much less than private school kids? Do the Mayor and the Council consider DCPS kids to be the city's stepchildren? |
| 107 | Alex Novelli | |
| 108 | Anne Schroeder | |
| 109 | Eliza Nagle | As a parishoner of St. Ann's Church I strongly oppose the PPP for Janney School and the Tenley Library. The impact of such a development upon the parishoners of St. Ann's and the children of St. Ann's Academy would be overwhelmingly negative. |
| 110 | Thomas Oscherwitz | |
| 111 | Amanda Maisels | |
| 112 | Betty Rogers | |
| 113 | Robert Marvin | |
| 114 | John | |
| 115 | Anonymous | |
| 116 | Mark E. Allen-Gifford | |
| 117 | Parisa Norouzi | |
| 118 | Anonymous | Please stop the nonsense about handing over precious public land to private developers, especially when its next to one of the most over-subscribed schools in the District. |
| 119 | Joe Stewart |
| 120 | Victoria Shabo | As a future Janney parent, I am very concerned that the school will lose green space, will have its renovation schedule pushed back, and will be deprived the benefit of a next-door library well into the next decade. |