| # | First Name | Last Name | State | Country | Comments |
|---|
| 1 | Bruce | Hahn | VA | US | Great idea! |
| 2 | Bruce | Hahn | VA | US | |
| 3 | TONY | LYND | FL | US | |
| 4 | Semyon | Grozman | | US | |
| 5 | Jackie | Frazer | | US | |
| 6 | Sandra | Crosby | WI | US | |
| 7 | Renee | Diana | | | |
| 8 | James | Mansdorfer | CA | US | |
| 9 | Dennis | Hoagland | UT | US | |
| 10 | Mark | Cheney | CA | US | |
| 11 | DWIGHT | LANDIS | OH | US | INDIVIDUAL HOME OWNERS NEED PRIVATE RIGHTS PROTECTED. THANKS,D. LANDIS |
| 12 | Atson | Reeder | CA | | About as basic as it gets for a free country. Oh, I forgot, this isn't a free country anymore: |
| 13 | Aaron | Beaule | VA | US | |
| 14 | Anthony | Coronato | | US | |
| 15 | Adrienne | Foley | | | |
| 16 | Debra | Brody | CA | US | |
| 17 | Catherine | Dorsey | NY | US | |
| 18 | Bernadette | Mendoza | | | |
| 19 | Jo | Fairchild | | | |
| 20 | David | Brain | MO | US | |
| 21 | Catharine | Cooper | CA | US | |
| 22 | Mark | Amedio | | | Does not appear to meet the idea of public interest. If the buyer wishes to buy property than the price paid should be high enough to not be refused. |
| 23 | Bobbie | Piety | | | |
| 24 | Brian | Gillespie | NC | US | |
| 25 | Don | Ferrell | CA | US | |
| 26 | Brian | Belnap | UT | US | |
| 27 | Carol | Wheeler | NV | US | We need to make sure the under privledged and those families who have so little, don't lose what they have. If a person who wants their property can come in and declare it to be manditory the property be used for a corporation or what ever company may want it. This needsto be stopped!
Thank You! |
| 28 | Stephen | Young | NC | | |
| 29 | Benjamin | Coll | MA | US | |
| 30 | Richard | Rhodes | CA | US | |
| 31 | Glenn | Spaid | CO | US | What happened to freedom in America? The US supreme court should be ashamed of itself! |
| 32 | Bryan | Taylor | | US | |
| 33 | Edward | Jeter | GA | US | |
| 34 | Yves F. | Panelli | CA | US | |
| 35 | Antoinette | Allia | | US | |
| 36 | ron | glandt | CO | US | |
| 37 | Andrew | Mazal | | US | Eminent domain should not be used to support private development efforts. |
| 38 | Guy | Smith, Jr. | FL | US | |
| 39 | Kevin | Coleman | | US | |
| 40 | Alan | Anderson | IL | US | |
| 41 | Arthur | von der Linden | | | |
| 42 | Richard | Huggins | | | The Supreme Court ruling is a travesty and really makes me mad, and sad, that local officials would grant such special priviledges to developers. We are all created equal and should be treated equally in this country. |
| 43 | Josh | DeWitt | | US | |
| 44 | June | Paci | | | |
| 45 | Arlene | Grahek | | | |
| 46 | Jerry | Jolley | | US | This court decision was a SAD day for America!!! |
| 47 | Judy | Ganeles | NY | US | |
| 48 | Rick | Tait | CA | US | |
| 49 | Hank | Ross | | | |
| 50 | ARTHUR | KLEIN | | | |
