| # | Name | Comments |
|---|
| 1851 | Owen Diplock G3NXK |
| 1852 | Bob Renvoize | |
| 1853 | Anonymous | If it goes in the name of progress another slice of our heritage goes forever only remembered in photographs.
Do not let it happen! |
| 1854 | Anonymous | |
| 1855 | Anonymous | |
| 1856 | David Lee | I strongly object to the proposed route of the Relief road as it will detract from the important Rougham Tower Museum |
| 1857 | David Harris |
| 1858 | Martin Redstall | |
| 1859 | martin timms | far to much of our heritage is being lost,and this being a memorial should left intact. |
| 1860 | Phil Woods | This proposed highway just doesnt make sense, it fiels in the face of those who served our country to be the free democracy it should be, and you get seemingly absurd decisions which spoil the efforts and enjoyments of thousends since and in the future. Be sensible and work with organisations, not fighting them and their humble efforts. |
| 1861 | Kay Spanswick | It seems incredibly sad that the men who made the ultimate sacrifice to preserve a lifestyle that has allowed the Local Authority Planners to grew up in freedom and safety, should be shown so little respect by the people they gave their lives to protect! Can we not reverse this awful attitude where cash is more important than humanity? |
| 1862 | tony brown | |
| 1863 | Anonymous | I give my full support to the preservation of the Rougham Radio Tower Museum in memory of those who gave their lives in the WW 2. |
| 1864 | Anonymous | I give my full support to the preservation of the Rougham Radio Tower Museum in memory of those who gave their lives in the WW 2. |
| 1865 | Peter.J.Hill | This must not be allowed to happen. |
| 1866 | Paul F. Lilienthal | As a former member of the 331st sqd of thr 94th Bomb group during the second world war I think the Tower association has done and are doing a wonderful job on restoring the area. I think it would be ashame to spoil this historical site to save a few pounds. Take up a colection to make up the cost difference. |
| 1867 | Paul C. Laincz | A road can be moved. An historical site cannot. I am a friend of an American who was stationed at
Rougham. I am also one who has respected the contribution made by my parents and relatives who fought in WWII. Please do not destroy these places for future generations. |
| 1868 | Stuart J McKinnon | Rougham does not need to be treated in this way, our American cousins from yesteryear need the respect they deserve, Poppycock to the Car/lorry!
save Rougham!! |
| 1869 | Peter Lilienthal | Save Rougham as a historic site, please! |
| 1870 | mark scales | |
| 1871 | mark scales | |
| 1872 | J porter | |
| 1873 | Marsha Mills |
| 1874 | Anonymous |
| 1875 | Anonymous | please preserve this important symbol of our history, and the dignity it deserves, as a reminder to future generations of the folly of war. |
| 1876 | Alan McIvor |
| 1877 | colin heithus | |
| 1878 | dennis otis | my uncle flew B 17s out of there. he ended his career flying B 52s during the Cold War. These historical landmarks deserve to be preserved for future generations. |
| 1879 | Jonathan Beales | I would like to see other options explored to the route of the proposed road that take on board the effect that any new road will have on the use of the airfield. Cost cannot be the main deciding factor when deciding the route.
I am not connected directly to any of the users of the airfield, but do like to be able to come the shows and see the air displays that are held here. |
| 1880 | jon murphy | only just found out about this airfield instead of clogging up yet more roads develope the rail network get freight back on it leave the land and history for people to enjoy what will we do with empty roads when the oil runs out you cant rebuild history |
| 1881 | Anonymous | Disgrace that a war memorial and historical site should be compromised in this way, |
| 1882 | Anonymous | The road should not be allowed to be so close to such an historic site. |
| 1883 | Martin Vasey G0HRZ | We owe it to those who served, and to those who strive to preserve the memory of them, to honour the places from which they left and to which they all too often failed to return. |
| 1884 | Mr. G Bloor | |
| 1885 | Anonymous | |
| 1886 | Anonymous | |
| 1887 | Robert Vince | The new road will ruin the country shows and air shows held at the airfield each year. |
| 1888 | Anonymous | It seems that progress no longer honors the debt we owe to all the airman/women whom gave there lifes for us which includes the so called planners. THIS DEBT CAN NEVER BE REPAID . This airfield is a memorial to all who fell so leave it alone and build your road elsewhere!!!! |
| 1889 | David Lister | Stop the tarmacking over historic sites This airfield asset to the area as it is. Remember the many that died operating from here, to preserve our freedom. More respect should be shown for their sacrifice |
| 1890 | Shaun Pettit | |
| 1891 | Jonathan Smith |
| 1892 | Clark Frederick | |
| 1893 | neil tucknutt | history is important! no relief road |
| 1894 | KEVIN DAY | |
| 1895 | graham hayhurst | as a long time attendie of the events staged at rougham "airfield", the proposed road scheme would only do great harm in the future of events being performed, in so much as severe restrictions on aerial activity, with the great possibilty of curtailment. the proposal would send out the message to, in particular our american cousens that the planners and council officals that the memorial and dedication in preserving history only apply if they have foundations in the middle ages.
as a published so called suppoter of the airfield and its events the council wave with one hand and shake two fingers with the other. |
| 1896 | graham hayhurst | as a long time attendie of the events staged at rougham "airfield", the proposed road scheme would only do great harm in the future of events being performed, in so much as severe restrictions on aerial activity, with the great possibilty of curtailment. the proposal would send out the message to, in particular our american cousens that the planners and council officals that the memorial and dedication in preserving history only apply if they have foundations in the middle ages.
as a published so called suppoter of the airfield and its events the council wave with one hand and shake two fingers with the other. |
| 1897 | David Baxter | |
| 1898 | Brian Fry | I strongly object to this historical area being spoiled by this road proposal.
Please keep the area free to be enjoyed by the local ratepayers as well as visitors from many parts of the world. |
| 1899 | Brian Fry | I strongly object to this historical area being spoiled by this road proposal.
Please keep the area free to be enjoyed by the local ratepayers as well as visitors from many parts of the world. |
| 1900 | Paul Baxter | Yet more of our history will be lost in the name of progress. Disgusting!!! |