Signatures Stop Alpine Super-Sidewalk Petition : [ powered by iPetitions.com ]

#	First Name	Last Name	State	Country	Comments
1	Virginia	Anderson	CA	US
2	Elaine	Haight	CA	US
3	Jeffrey	Castellino	CA	US
4	Magaly	Castellino	CA	US
5	marsha	abbott
6	Cindy	Butler	CA	US
7	rebecca	goodman
8	Charlotte	Turner	CA	US
9	Harry	Turner	CA	US	Stanford's duplicity in this matter is dismaying, though not surprising. It's claims to moral probity are false, as this latest dissembling action confirms. I write from the perspective of a former long term employee with an insiders experience with Stanford's top tier management.
10	Peter	Caryotakis	CA	US	I'd be happy to see a trail on the opposite side of the creek. Where there is ROOM!!! You really can't expect Ladera's shopping center to move. There is simply no room.
11	Eva	Blum	CA	US	PLEASE! lET UNDERTAKINGS BE HONORED. LET THE COMMUNITY VOICE BE HEARD!
12	marie	concetta	CA
13	neilda	sussman
14	Steve	Zuckerman			As an alumnus of Stanford, their proposal is embarassing. They should do what they promised. Thanks.
15	Richard	Zeren	CA	US
16	Peter	Drekmeier	CA	US
17	Sherry	Lund		US	Stanford should keep their commitment and create trails in Santa Clara County in their own land.
18	Lynn	McLeod	CA	US	There is too much traffic along the street -- I prefer the trail be through the fields, away from smog, noise, and danger.
19	Debra	Meyerson	CA		I am a Stanford Professor and this sounds like a horrible abuse of power.
20	Demetra	Paras
21	mike	mullen
22	kay	kang
23	Jennifer	Loftus	CA	US
24	Richard	Shoup		US	Nonsense!
25	carla	cassani		US
26	Joyce	Avery	CA	US
27	Joanne	narad	CA	US
28	Mary	Lund	CA	US
29	Cathleen	Mette
30	Bill	Baker	CA	US	THIS IS NOT SATISFACTORY FOR YOU TO FULFILL YOUR OBLIGATIONS FOR TRAILS ON YOUR PROPERTY AS AGREED.
31	Ron	Voss		US
32	Philippe	Piernot
33	Catherine	Mathews	CA	US	It's totally wrong for privately owned land to be taken over by a privately owned University, even if it is the almighty Stanford!
34	Amanda	Lee	CA	US
35	Roxana	Wales	CA	US
36	Nandita	Gupta
37	Rev. Wayne	Dalton
38	Judith	Bell	CA	US
39	hal	friedman	CA	US	i agree that the proposed trail on Alpine Rd. is not nearly as beneficial to public as the alt. across the dish lands.
40	Michael	Fero	CA	US	Stanford Planners, Please do the right thing and support the Community Supported Trial alternative. Mike Fero
41	patricia	allen	CA	US
42	Shehnaz	Khan
43	Malcolm	Slaney	CA		I am both a Palo Alto resident and a Stanford instructor. I do not believe that a trail or sidewalk along (Old) Page Mill or Alpine avenue qualifies under the GUP.
44	Debra	Tyler
45	Claire	Heinzelman	CA		Please do not approve of this proposal by Stanford. It has no recreational value.
46	Harold	Hanerfeld	CA	US
47	Linda	Filling	CA	US	Let's keep this a pleasant, quiet trail for hiking, biking, and golf carts, Why would we need a thoroughfare?
48	Gavin	Christensen		US	I am usually a supporter of Stanford's rights for their own land and appreciate all they have done for the surrounding communities. But this proposal is ridiculous. This is not what they agreed to, not their land, wrong county entirely, and a recreational trail 5 feet from 45 mph traffic is absurd.
49	Michael	Harville	CA	US	I fought Stanford on their GUP proposals 5 years ago, and am disappointed to see that they are trying to go back on even the limited promises they made at the time. Shame! I'm an alum, too - no more money for Stanford until they do the right thing.
50	geoffrey	tate	CA	US