Powered by iPetitions - start your online petition now

 

Signatures | Total: 416

 

# NameComments
301 ChristopherIncluding the science in the congestion charging cordon is ridiculous
302 David CarterThis I feel would be the final nail in the coffin for traders in the Mill Rd area.
303 Rebecca Richardson
304 Sue Western
305 Jason Wells
306 Anonymous
307 R Green
308 Robert Milner
309 Alan Morgan
310 Katy wytheI am Cambridge born and bread as such it is my right to be able to visit my home town without having to pay to visit or drive through. I have spent my whole life in cambridge and I would be very upset to see it change! Katy wythe (Richardson) Born in mill rd maternity hospital, aged 36 yrs
311 Simon Arfnold
312 ivan Gilzeananother tax on the working man by bloody academics
313 Anonymousanother tax on the working man by bloody academics
314 Julie Pearl
315 Anne DockerillDon't kill Cambridge by charging entry
316 Sylvia McpeakEquates to taxation for going to work!
317 Nick AldertonThe impact on business within the congestion charge will have a negative impact on the prosperity of the city. If the charges are implemented then first the public transport and cycle lanes need upgrading to give people a viable option.
318 Nick AldertonThe impact on business within the congestion charge will have a negative impact on the prosperity of the city. If the charges are implemented then first the public transport and cycle lanes need upgrading to give people a viable option.
319 Michael PerkinsI completely disagree with being charged to enter Cambridge where I work on the Science Park and approach it from the A14 whereby I do not contribute to congestion in the city at all.
320 Anonymous
321 Tracey JacobThe direct bus route to the science park got stopped due to lack of interest. The guided bus stops are planned for swavesey and st ives which both entail a drive to get to them . If the congestion charge is enforced as published, I will be looking for another job (and probably a longer commute), as the extra £3.50 a day to get to work will not make my currrent employment worthwhile.
322 paul zbihlyjNo current public transport or park and ride scheme in the Cambridge area is anywhere near appropriate for the daily commute to my Cambridge based employer.In terms of timing ,a proposed congestion charge is about 10 years too early in terms of the infrastructure that would need to be in place to provide a workable alternative for commuters. Government financial incentives are a distraction in this sense and the city council should not be seduced by this. Please ensure you listen to the people-Stockport have just resoundingly rejected a similar proposed congestion charge.
323 Simon Naylor
324 Anonymous
325 Helen Lee
326 Jason SloweWith public transport being as bad as it is, the best way to get in is to drive and park, and considering the charge of parking, you'd think it would be enough!!
327 Anonymous
328 Colin GerrardWhy Cambridge
329 Catriona Gallacher
330 AnonymousPeople on low wages will not be able to afford the congestion charge. Many of these people will still need their cars to visit their family and friends. You are taking away our freedom.
331 Mark Norris
332 Rebecca BadcockCan't afford to live close to work, salary would be greatly reduced if I worked closer to home, have children in childcare so public transport not suitable for timings, house prices have rocketed in my area AGAIN so have to work in Cambridge to get the money to pay mortgage, chose to work on the outskirts of Cambridge for ease and now find I am having to pay AGAIN! It's a VICIOUS cycle. But of course, if I stayed at home and had more kids and lived of benefits then someone would pay all of this for me!!!!
333 Anonymous
334 AnonymousIf all the congestion causing measures that have been introduced over the last 10 years were removed, there would be no need to consider such 'remedies' as congestion charging for what is a manufactured problem.
335 witcherlyWhen i was a child there was a lot of fuss about making Newmarket road wider ,now we have stupid bus lanes and it's back to square one.Too many traffic lights too many roundabouts and too many bus lanes. I shall not go into town during those hours , will i go at all?
336 AnonymousWhen i was a child there was a lot of fuss about making Newmarket road wider ,now we have stupid bus lanes and it's back to square one.Too many traffic lights too many roundabouts and too many bus lanes. I shall not go into town during those hours , will i go at all?
337 AnonymousWhen i was a child there was a lot of fuss about making Newmarket road wider ,now we have stupid bus lanes and it's back to square one.Too many traffic lights too many roundabouts and too many bus lanes. I shall not go into town during those hours , will i go at all?
338 Jamie Fry
339 Anonymous
340 AnonymousI have heard remarks from the city council along the lines of 'forcing' people out of their cars. Do they not realise that everyone who can find a reliable and affordable alternative way in to Cambridge has already done so? The proposed congestion charge is really just another tax on motorists.
341 Andrea Sainty
342 Arend Jan van BochovenSurely if there was a congestion charge it should exclude the science park, since it will disadvantage companies there compared to other science parks?
343 Anonymous
344 Eleanor Howard
345 claire stribling
346 Rebecca Hannah
347 Dr Emma JaffrayI am currently training at Addenbrookes and use Cambridge for retail and recreational purposes. It is already extremely expensive to park in Cambridge and any congestion charge would increase cost to £10 to merely visit Cambridge. Also what about the staff and visitors of Addenbrookes? Many people work shifts and the Park and Ride is not available after early evening, what provision is to be made for these groups?
348 Roz JarvisI run a small business and will use Cambridge's roads whether there is a congestion charge or not. I will inevitably pass the charge on to my customers. The charge will not deter me from using my car because I have to use it to run my business. It is outrageous to suggest that Cambridge has a congestion charge in the future as it has an overpriced and completely inadequate public transport system so even the people who might consider using it are largely deterred. London is an exception because the public transport system is reasonably efficient and the centre of London is not the only part where people work. Cambridge city centre serves a wide area and people come in to it from all parts of the county. School bus services should operate to ease the congestion during term time as this is the main reason for congestion during the week. I have been opertaing my business for 13 years in and around the city centre and am in no doubt as to this being the main problem. My journey time is always less during the school holidays, mostly it is at least halved. Making it difficult financially for people to visit the centre of Cambridge by car on top of the already hugely overpriced and inadequate car parking facilities can only be detrimental for central businesses. I wholeheartedly agree with the sentiments expressed by many that this is only a new way of raising yet more money from the already 'overcharged for everything' Cambridge residents and business owners. A referendum locally is essential at the very least.
349 Robina ParsonageI have lived in Cambridge for many years and policed it for 30 years so have noticed the traffic at different times of the day. It is obvious to most ,and, has previously been mentioned, that the school traffic is a problem. The holidays are a relief! So I agree that improvements in the bussing in of students would help.
350 AnonymousJust because many people choose to send their children to school in Cambridge they are to be penalised. School and businesses are bound to suffer, many will probably move outside the city and who can blame them. Public transport MUST improve considerably: the cost of taking my children on the bus will be no less then the congestion charge and with a bus journey of over an hour and a half there (and then back) why bother?

 

Signatures | Total: 416