| # | Comments |
|---|---|
| 151 | Please think of our future. Once we lose this unique space, we'll never get it back. Remember that as public servants you are in office to work for our good, not just your own. We are watching you. |
| 152 | I am a former resident of Wheeler Hill (having owned three homes there over the course of the years), and I can not imagine what these politicians are thinking! Leave 5 Points alone! |
| 153 | |
| 154 | |
| 155 | |
| 156 | I oppose the out of scale, too tall building being proposed in Five Points on the former site of Kenny's Auto |
| 157 | |
| 158 | |
| 159 | |
| 160 | Surely there is a better way to provide more parking for the Five Points area, or is that what the goal is here? |
| 161 | |
| 162 | |
| 163 | |
| 164 | |
| 165 | |
| 166 | |
| 167 | |
| 168 | I am not a City of Columbia resident currently but did grow up in the Shandon area just above Five Points and spend many of my Saturdays shopping in the Five Points area. |
| 169 | Six stories would not fit in with the character of Five Points. The parking should be in a separate location. |
| 170 | Keep the Pressure on these guys. We need responsive and responsible Government. |
| 171 | |
| 172 | |
| 173 | |
| 174 | We don't need to change the character of 5 Points. |
| 175 | |
| 176 | |
| 177 | Don't build the garage, and keep the height of any structure there limited. |
| 178 | |
| 179 | |
| 180 | |
| 181 | |
| 182 | |
| 183 | Outrageous!!! |
| 184 | |
| 185 | |
| 186 | |
| 187 | If the developers can go ahead with this project, they need to fund. Taxpayers should not be asked to invest in what may prove to be unsustainable financially. |
| 188 | |
| 189 | This proposed building is grossly out of character with Five Points. We are tampering with the image of a very important part of Columbia. |
| 190 | |
| 191 | |
| 192 | |
| 193 | |
| 194 | Please respect the concerns of the incoming councilwoman for this district! |
| 195 | I do not believe that taxpayers should support the infrastructure for a commercial enterprise. In essence, we'd be building the foundation for their building. I believe in garages, but not a taxpayer expense. And this particular building would detract from the character of the area. |
| 196 | |
| 197 | |
| 198 | I oppose the construction of the this building, which will have have a visual impact on the character of the Five Points area. What are these people thinking. |
| 199 | |
| 200 |