| 1531 | David X. | 1. Causes of Action
My own research began with a single, simple question about Paxil and FDA, which was, “How could there possibly be a drug on the market affecting so many people so badly?”
To try and answer this question, I decided to research Paxil and other “Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor” drugs at Harriett Taubman Medical Library in Ann Arbor, Michigan, and right out of the gate, I found a profound contradiction: I was able to compile a weighty stack of reports from medical journals, written by doctors, with titles such as “Paroxetine Induced Psychotic Mania” and, “Severe Psychiatric Symptoms Associated with Paroxetine Withdrawl”, all bearing dates of 1995 and earlier, yet in 2000, we were all being target-marketed by advertisements in every form, stating the drugs were safe, and had no ill-effects from discontinuation. Which led immediately to the question, “How could this possibly be?”
Given my own experiences reflected the findings reported in the buried medical journal articles, while the marketing continued to assail, this was not the kind of question I was willing to leave unanswered, and to compound matters, I found many other such discrepancies and indications of organized mass deception, not only by the industry, but also on the parts of government agencies responsible for both regulating industry and enforcing law.
The magnitude and implications of these findings remain overwhelming on many fronts, and due to the types and degrees of industry cooperation on the part of regulatory agencies and other organizations, it became clear that to investigate this class of drugs also meant to investigate the possibility an unprecedented pharmaceutical terrorism – if not a well-conceived and subtle form of planned systematic genocide - may have been, and continue to be, taking place upon the United States, it’s allies around the world.
The purpose of this report is to outline the reasons for my conclusions regarding this possibility as affirmative.
In order to comprehend the means by which these efforts have been occurring since WWII, it is essential to understand the compromise of our healthcare systems as part of a far more serious and covertly concerted effort against the United States and it’s allies over time. In order for these efforts to take place by the means and on the scale they have, key elements had to have been put in place over time. Many recently released documents confirm these elements have been put in place; it is only by way of these elements working in conjunction over time they have been successful, and in part, it is by way of these successes becoming so overt attention has assembled enough of it’s components to reveal the nature of what I understate as this complex and disturbing problem set.
To understand this lucidly, one is required to utilize an ability to think outside long-established contexts and concepts, with specific knowledge of government, intelligence, history, industry, medicine and law, and to recognize key elements of current and past national and international events with a shrewd and logical regard to the same.
2. Historical Misinformation Stands Corrected
The long established, accepted and instructed perception of the end of WWII by Americans in general with regard to Nazi Germany is essentially, “we won” – that, “The Allies mopped up all but a few errant troublemakers at Nuremberg, and the world was safe again from the terrible scourge of Nazi ideals ethics and practices.”
As revealed in the 2004 Cambridge University Press’ release, U.S. Intelligence and the Nazis, authored by four members of the Interagency Working Group assigned to obtain and interpret millions of documents pertaining to U.S. utilization of Nazis after WWII (declassified since just 1998 and later), nothing about the perception of the end of WWII I’ve described could be farther from the truth, more misleading, or more damaging over the years since 1945.
The IWG book is primarily a collection of facts, as it’s authors state, to be used as a tool by other researchers. Presented, are good questions pertaining to the non-release of documents still withheld by CIA, and still other questions regarding the motives of many high and lower-level U.S. officials. Understandably, the IWG authors show a great deal of care and restraint in not drawing conclusions which can be easily reached, while it is apparent still others elude them. What is soberingly clear is, the war against the Nazis did not end with WWII; it simply changed, immediately, into the next phase which the Nazis had planned very well for. As the IWG book illustrates – but fails either to fully grasp or fully reveal, once WWII ended in military victory and corresponding military defeat, the war continued, as a busy, behind-the-scenes intelligence game of, “if you can’t beat ‘em, join ‘em – then beat ‘em.”
One key element illustrated by the IWG book, and by the troves of documents kept classified for so long is, the Nazis had enough of a high level foothold to pull this off. What is glaringly obvious today is, they have used this foothold since WWII to make tremendous, sweeping advances, and by way of this, continue to do so virtually unhindered.
To understand this, one is required to update their definition of the term, “Nazi”. By comparison, and in part by Nazism’s increasing influence upon the organization, The Ku Klux Klan (which has increasing ties to Nazism and to U.S. Intelligence) have become less about wearing it’s ceremonial attire and debasing themselves, and more about operating covertly, blending into the general populace, and infiltrating – banks, business and medical organizations, legal circles, political offices, and even the U.S. Military and other government organizations.
By the same comparison in reverse, Nazis referred to here are no longer the uniformed tormenters of the 1930’s and 40’s. Like many other groups, they have an upper and lower class - the latter of which is visible any given night, on MSNBC’s “Lockup” series. The Nazi upper class, surviving or descendant of WWII, is not so blatant and outwardly offensive. Since WWII, they have become increasingly engrained in American life, as Americans or citizens of other countries, either by way of having ancestry here, or by being installed covertly, working for corporations and governments around the world. Nazi ideology is basically the same as it ever was – now, however, Nazism is no longer specific to any one nationality, and operates freely and secretly through the world.
Just as one can no longer reliably identify a Nazi by his or her attire, the only sure-fire ways one can identify the modern Nazi, are by identifying actions based upon the Nazi ideology, behavior or known Nazi mission statements – be they actions taken by individuals or by groups – even if (and especially if) any of these groups happen to be part of the U.S. Government.
Increasingly since WWII, actions based in identifiably Nazi ideology and behavior have taken place behind the closed doors of globally-based corporations and universities, working in conjunction - and conflict of interest - with U.S. and other Government Agencies having abilities to classify in secret, and control the actions - and the creation - of other U.S. Government Agencies – and U.S. Policy.
A conclusion not overlooked by IWG is, they – and the American populace - have enough information in front of them to warrant demanding the release of any and all files pertaining to US utilization of Nazis after WWII; IWG began with these grounds, but when IWG member and Congresswoman Patricia Schroeder requested the remaining files, she met with non-compliance, and has stated a high-ranking CIA official advised her, “There are things CIA doesn’t want the public to know.”
To this day the files have not all been released, but in what is available, there is more than enough evidence to suggest the reasons the files remain classified, are because – by now -releasing them would unearth an exponentially growing number of strings of damning information, running through an array of present issues, current and Post WWII past events, implicate thousands of, “respectable Americans” and force full disclosure and public audit of all CIA activity, due to it’s clandestine abuse and corruption of other government bodies and agencies, and industries and universities here and abroad. As the IWG book illustrates clearly, all of these things have been influenced and compromised by extensive, covert employment and placement of high and low-level Nazi intelligence strategists, operatives, scientists, policy makers and genocide planners.
Given the fact persons such as Otto Von Bolschwing and Walter Rauff were given asylum, employed and placed in U.S. based pharmaceutical companies like Parke-Davis and Warner-Lambert (now both part of Pfizer) by CIA;
Given CIA based it’s egregiously unethical LSD research on faulty intelligence fabricated for both the U.S. and U.S.S.R. by Reinhard Gehlen and his network (thereby playing both into The Cold War) – who in addition to many others was given asylum in the U.S. and employed by CIA with virtually no oversight;
Given Dr. Robert Felix – one of whom was funded by CIA to conduct part of this LSD research upon Black Americans, was also responsible for lobbying Congress in the early 1960’s to pour millions into the creation of NIMH, countless community mental health clinics, and the alteration of university curriculums, to adopt teaching texts such as the DSM;
It is evident these things have lain the groundwork for a system design which subverts, mis-educates and replicates itself. The aim of intelligence is to advance upon (or defeat) an enemy by way of what they do not – or what they think they do – know. Many in healthcare - and in intelligence – enter their respective fields with no other intention than to help people be healthy, or help protect their country. When what is trusted and taught is sound, the results are positive.
When they are not, proportionately, it is reflected in the results. Given what is outlined in this document, current mental health, drug safety and research ethics lapses we’ve seen and have been seeing over time are no surprise to those with a grasp of these issues.
Ironically – and to me quite unexpectedly - the same threads running through serious early intelligence compromises continue, as a culture, running straight through the pharmaceutical and university research industries and drug safety issues encircling FDA. They zigzag through both sides of The Cold War, The Korean and Vietnam conflicts, the perpetuated strife in the Middle East – all the way up through explosive seen and unseen events surrounding September 11, 2001. Visible throughout all of these things, are many of the same players operating out of high-end corporate structures doing business spanning decades with the U.S. Government, continually exiting and re-entering government.
3. Contra-Indications, Deception and Harm
At the time I began this research in 2000, I knew very little about neuroscience, but I knew I would have to familiarize myself with as much of it’s terms and physiology as possible if I was going to understand any answers I might find, and convey them to regulators.
For example, I found many medical journal articles on the subject of SSRI induced, “aniscoria” but had no idea what it meant; it wasn’t until I learned aniscoria is the condition of having one pupil become markedly larger than the other, I was able to attach a name to a side effect I had experienced myself. Shortly after this, I realized this recently-coined term is jargon, designed specifically to confuse, and avoid the question of the SSRI-induced brain imbalance indicated by the condition; aniscoria is merely the indication of a deeper imbalance within the brain. I’ve seen no such literature addressing SSRI-induced aniscoria as such, and to the best of my knowledge, the condition is neither understood or resolved – it is simply labeled with a name addressing it’s indication – and approved – as if it is something you or I might not notice, mind having, or need to understand. By sharp contrast, it is common practice in emergency rooms for staff to check victims of severe head trauma for uneven pupil diameter, as this is an indication of deep brain trauma.
After this, I began searching for a simplified, comprehensive answer which might explain the discrepancies revealed by these initial findings, and reveal the means by which the SSRI drug can wreak such a wide range of havoc within the human physiology. At the time, I wasn’t even sure if there was such an answer, but given the degree of contrast between the facts in the buried data, and the fantasy in advertisement, I felt such an answer must exist – and this became the test - if I could find such an answer within the physiology or pharmacology, I could not only expose the fraud and deception, I could debunk the false science behind it.
After months of of often frantic trudging through a maze of medical reports and terminology that only seemed to become larger and more incomprehensible, I found my answer – and in this answer, stumbled upon the most egregious, damaging and criminally deceptive mass-marketing ever thrust upon the U.S. and the globe in it’s entire history:
Corporate and Federally-sponsored research, “found depressed and otherwise disordered persons maintain lower, “imbalanced” levels of the neurotransmitter, serotonin.” Their solution to this has been the Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor drug, “which blocks the reuptake of serotonin – it keeps the serotonin from exiting the synapses, causing it to build, resulting in a restoration of efficient electrochemical transmission within the brain, and thus, an alleviation of depressive symptoms.”
The Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary exposes the deception, and the degree to which scientific basics have been compromised and overlooked:
Serotonin is
“a phenolic amine neurotransmitter that is a powerful vasoconstrictor, and is found especially in the brain, blood serum and gastric mucosa of mammals.”
Nowhere, in the sheaves of literature I’d sifted, had I seen serotonin defined as anything other than, “a neurotransmitter” and since, I have found only three other such references to serotonin as, “a powerful vasoconstrictor”.
One such reference is historical – and was in the process of being removed from the shelves of a library the moment I found it; this reference illustrated the use of serotonin’s vasoconstrictive properties shortly after it was discovered in the early 1940’s, by listing accounts of local injection to the vagina, in order to curtail pregnancy-related bleeding.
As the human brain is an organ which thrives upon oxygen carried by it’s vasculature, serotonin is most emphatically not a chemical any human needs to cause their brain to stockpile, by way of taking a product designed to cause this action.
By contrast, that serotonin is, “a powerful vasoconstrictor” is likely instructive of the brain’s natural ability to fight it’s own depressions: if depressed persons were found to have lower serotonin levels, it is far more likely this illustrates the brain’s efforts to increase it’s oxygen levels, by way of decreasing it’s vasoconstrictor levels.
That these findings of lower serotonin can only be accurately measured (and in such studies, were made) after death indicates no way to make the measurement indicating, “imbalance” upon the living in any diagnostic way.
While FDA did finally curtail this type of serotonin-based marketing, they have failed to acknowledge the types of damage and probable damage serotonin as vasoconstrictor can bring upon human physical and mental well-being.
One exceedingly plausible and increasingly popular theory states: “Elevated serotonin (as vasoconstrictor) can deprive the brain’s conscience mechanisms of the oxygen levels they require to function properly, while increasing electrochemical activity to these improperly functioning brain mechanisms.”
The degree of violence and health problems proven to be associated with SSRI drug usage have long been more than enough to warrant full market removal. If those at FDA wish to hold a belief, “more research needs to be done”, it is very strongly suggested they (and those of other agencies having influence upon FDA) be made to take a look at the information they’ve had and avoided addressing for two decades or more, and make altogether certain this and other similarly unethical research does not continue to be carried out upon the general population of the United States.
Instead of this, however, we have been given the Black Box Warning, in a woefully lacking, partial acknowledgement SSRI drugs can cause suicide and violent behavior in children and young adults - up to age 18 – as if there were a biological mechanism they had identified, keeping the mal-effects of SSRI’s from occurring once the patient/consumer reached age 18.
There is no such biological mechanism. SSRI induced suicidality and violent behavior can occur in people of any age taking the drugs. Science has no way of telling who will and who will not be affected in these ways. This is supported by the entire chronology of medical journal articles on SSRI-related violence and suicide, and yet another citable reason for market removal.
Also absent from the Black Box Warning was any information on the kinds of severe birth defects resulting in SSRI usage by pregnant women, which have only begun to surface recently. Because of, “fast-tracking” the drug approval process (which is confronted in the pages ahead), no pre-approval, long-term studies were done. Instead, what passes for long-term studies was, and continues to be, carried out upon the general population after market approval.
This applies to all types of drugs, from Vioxx and related, post-approval heart problems - by what have been estimated to be 35,000 people, to Oxycontin’s being found - after market approval - to be lethal when mixed with alcohol. The lives lost to bringing this type of information to light were those of American citizens, whose only mistakes were trusting the drug safety system we now have in place.
To add insult to injury, the Black Box Warning - which was touted as, “FDA’s strongest warning” - had never been used on any drug literature before it’s recent application to SSRI drug warnings; it had only been used on cigarette packaging. While we can expect such warnings to be expanded in content and application, it is certain that if actual drug safety regulators had considered such warnings during the drug approval processes and acted appropriately, and if those that did consider those warnings were not prevented from acting appropriately, an incomprehensible amount of suffering by a great many could have been – and could be – avoided.
4.
Many have remarked, it almost seems as if the same people developing and marketing these types of drugs are “in bed” with the same people approving them without real regulation at FDA, while still others of the same ilk blanket-replace consideration of safety issues with programmed issues of drug price, in a distraction scheme to both, gouge the consumer, and weaken safety regulation systems further. What I have found is, this is exactly what’s been happening – and has been since WWII.
The answers to how and by whom would not fully begin to surface until the publication of the IWG book, U.S. Intelligence and the Nazis. While the book does not address this problem set directly, it provides answers which, in tandem with other key information available, provide clear evidence the U.S. is - and has been - under attack, within the framework of new evolutionary steps in intelligence-based warfare altogether, fully utilizing the concept of marketed pharmaceuticals as weapons, in an unprecedented reinvention of the scale and concept of, “the inside job”.
Central to this effort has been the CIA’s abilities to place it’s, “assets” in positions within other government agencies, businesses and universities – which, in spite of findings by such things as The Church Committee Hearings – has gone on unchecked since this agency’s beginnings after WWII. As we but glimpse by way of the IWG book, the creation of the CIA itself may very well have been the next phase of the postwar Nazi plan.
I knew that before I would ever be able to make such an assertion - and certainly, to ever be taken seriously by anyone, I would have to find credible documentation of CIA gaining (by way of subversion of law) and exercising such authority upon other government agencies.
Col. Fletcher Prouty served in presidential administration. Like it or not, he didn’t like what he saw happening, and before he died, wrote about it in complex detail. Below is the excerpt from his book, outlining the means by which FDA , businesses, universities and other government agencies have been compromised:
“This is another part of the special expertise of the ST. The CIA would use secrecy and need-to-know control to arrange with a Cabinet-level officer for the cover assignment of an Agency (CIA) employee to that organization, for example, the Federal Aviation Administration. The Cabinet officer would agree without too much concern, and quietly tip off his manpower officer to arrange a slot (personnel space) for someone who would be coming into a certain office. He would simply say, “the slot would be reimbursed”, and this would permit the FAA to carry a one-man overage in it’s manning tables. Soon the man would arrive to work in that position. As far as his associates would know, he would be on some special project, and in a short time he would have worked so well into the staff, they would not know he wasn’t really one of them. Turnover being what it is in bureaucratic Washington, it would not be long before everyone around that position would have forgotten it was a special slot. It would be a normal FAA position with a CIA man in it.
Then CIA would beef up the power of that position until the man was in a position that could be used for membership on various committees, boards, and so on. In the case of FAA the actual slotted men are in places where they can assist CIA with many requirements in the field of aviation, both transport and aircraft maintenance, and supply companies.
This same procedure works for slots in Departments of State, Defense, and even in the White House. By patient and determined exploitation and maneuvering of these positions, CIA is able to get key men in places where they are ready for a time when CIA wishes to pull strings. This is intricate and long-range work; there are many variations in which this can be done, and CIA is adept at the use of these tactics. It is done skillfully, and under the veil of heavy secrecy. Many key CIA career men have served in such slots as agents operating within the U.S. Government, and there is no doubt security measures utilized to cover these agents within our own government have been heavier than those used between the U.S. and other countries.
The IWG book outlines many whom have been given this type of authority and placed in these types of positions in the time since WWII.
In 2004, I visited CIA’s website, and found there were a variety of positions open for psychologists and psychiatrists within CIA – contrary to it’s often-referenced mission statement – “in order to implement CIA’s medical policies worldwide” (which they have since reworded to read, “Join us on the world stage.”)
It is evident CIA has been engaged in this implementation without regard for The Constitution, American or World Citizens, or Truth - in Science, Medicine, Education or Advertisement.
5. The Plot Sickens
During the Church Committee Hearings, Ted Kennedy is quoted as saying (of the MK Ultra projects), “The Deputy Director of the CIA revealed that over thirty universities and institutions were involved in an "extensive testing and experimentation" program which included covert drug tests on unwitting citizens "at all social levels, high and low, native Americans and foreign." Other sources have stated the number of universities and institutions used in these programs at 80 – at a taxpayer cost of (then) over 35 million dollars. CIA head Richard Helms is said to have had all the files on MK Ultra destroyed, but whether this obstruction of justice (via destruction of evidence) actually took place or not, Helms’ associate and successor, George H.W. Bush understood this model for exploiting the educational system, and applied it on an exponentially larger scale with regard to the antidepressant drugs pioneered by his own company, Eli Lilly (which was already on the CIA payroll as the company previously contracted to manufacture LSD at the behest of Reinhard Gehlen).
Per it’s own statements quoted above from it’s website, CIA has been blatantly engaged in this activity of Corporate, Healthcare and Educational system espionage and subversion with no real oversight since it’s creation after WWII. And all the while, therein, are Nazis no one ever dreamed could ever be working behind the scenes in our own government. But there (some of) it is, in black and white – as the rest – an unknown amount - remains classified?
What part of this registers as, “acceptable” to you?
Work occurring under both Bush administrations are obvious continuations of the groundwork in psychiatry and mind altering drugs lain by The Gehlen Network, Robert Felix, and others, as mentioned previously in this document.
Of Nixon’s associations with Parke-Davis while Von Bolschwing was employed there and living in California, it is public knowledge. But had it become public knowledge while Nixon was in office, Watergate would have paled in comparison to the resulting scandals – and was likely the tip of the iceberg as it is. This isn’t merely an opinion – it’s a logical conclusion based upon factual history. And there’s a lot more where that came from:
It is public knowledge G.H.W. Bush was head of CIA, and that he sat on the board of Eli Lilly, along with his Vice President, Danforth Quayle.
It is public knowledge many other figures, such as Mitch Daniels and Daniel Troy have also served in conflict of interest on presidential administrations and on pharmaceutical company administrations.
It is public knowledge this a type of business-model applying to other types of corporate businesses (such as Halliburton and Blackwater) also conducting business in conflict of interest with The U.S. Government.
It is public knowledge Danforth Quayle and George H.W. Bush are responsible for much of the drug safety regulation being dropped in the 80’s, and initiation of the, “fast-track” drug approval process (complete with conflict of interest waivers at FDA) being implemented, by way of, “The White House Council on Competitiveness”, working under the guise of finding a cure for AIDS, via increasing competition for a cure due to high public demand. But there was no clause in the dropped regulations limiting the fast track process to AIDS-related drugs – and if there was, it was not adhered to. As a result, this type of approval process became the accepted standard we have today for all drugs – either due to an absence of actual drug regulators and regulation, or via the strong-arming of the FDA by an influencing agency or agencies under the clandestine direction of multiple Presidents, acting in direct, multiple conflicts of interest.
This usage of the AIDS epidemic and it’s resultant blowback, in tandem with other unanswered questions and still other information available, continues to raise doubts and valid questions about the origins of the AIDS virus, and what could very well have been it’s purposes.
Today, in spite of the dangers of Paxil and other SSRI and SNRI drugs increasingly becoming widely understood – albeit still not acknowledged by those entrusted with regulatory authority – the drugs continue to be administered to The American General Population, as the well-documented violence associated continues daily, in one part of the country or another.
Equally treasonous, U.S. Troops continue to be administered Paxil as an FDA -approved treatment for PTSD, for which there remains no comprehensive, fully biologically understood, drug-treatable origins. Government media-drivers and censors continue to dictate misleading stories for mainstream mass media publication of every kind, in blatant, identifiable attempts to deceive the public about causes of the highest U.S. Military Suicide Statistics in history, which are undeniably and directly related to this SSRI usage.
6. Conclusions
I could continue to connect this conspiracy with volumes of these types of valid, factual citations, but the picture assembled here is clear. You may fact-check this all you like, and you won’t get me down to below 90%. As an American citizen who is an artist and instrument builder, I have been personally and deeply affected by the machine you see outlined here (in ways I will not outline here), and have been witness to many others also being affected very adversely by the same. Thus, I have very much been thrust into being bound by conscience to do everything I can to help anyone who will listen understand what I have found over the past decade, in the hopes of seeing these problems remedied at their sources for the good of all.
While this was never on my list of things I wanted to do, or have enjoyed doing, because of what I have found, I have had no choice; I’ve seen a need for somebody to try and figure this out, and I’m sick of watching these things continue. I’m sick of picking up the paper nearly every day, and seeing another murder-suicide, by another poor bastard being treated for mental illness, only to continue to see the resultant violence blamed on some supposedly pre-existing mental health condition. It’s not progress. It’s not medicine. It’s not science. It’s the oldest trick in the book: You take your car to a crooked mechanic; the mechanic damages the car further, claims it was already that way, and you pay dearly – only in these scenarios, it’s not a car – it’s the American Citizen. Children. Soldiers. Mothers. Fathers. Wives. Brothers. Sisters. And why?
Because we created agencies that can operate with no oversight, on outrageous, secret budgets, working far outside their intended missions, acting in egregious, treasonous manners, employing war criminals of the most dangerous and notorious kinds known to man in history, and allowing them to act upon every aspect of our society and ourselves. In secret. And to undo this?
You’re going to have to face the realities of what has been created; you’re going to have to outsmart what you’ve created, and stop the mechanisms from continuing to replicate itself via miseducation, bad science, bad policies and worse people. I’ve already acknowledged there are good people in healthcare and in intelligence, but when they answer to those who are not, what – other than what we have – could be expected?
If any reader of this happens to be an American, or an American entrusted with regulatory authority or law enforcement? Sure – you can disregard this if you like, and stay on whatever non-effectual, pork-barreled bandwagon you wish. If you do though, you can count yourselves part of the problems and not part of the solutions – and you can expect the same random, psychdrug-related ultra violence to continue, at the same heavy cost to this nation and it’s people. Maybe when your 15 year-old daughter (or 60 year old brother) is pointing a 9mm at you, or hanging dead in your garage, you’ll listen then.
You can also expect the opposition to this to continue to increase, ultimately resulting in still more violence, by organized domestic factions. (Note – By saying this I make no such a threat; I’m just stating an obvious statistical probability.) Some of you will agree, and some of you will simply say, “Bring it on”, and anticipate getting to use their new crowd control toys.
None of these are desirable ends, or appropriate drug safety regulation. By now these types of problems are WAY out of control. If you can deny there are such problems, to such degrees, I’ll call that behavior characteristic of Nazis. And I’m sick of seeing that too.
7. Citiations
Severe Psychiatric Symptoms Associated with Paroxetine Withdrawl, 1 July 1995, The Lancet, Vol. 346(8966) p. 57.
Paroxetine Induced Psychotic Mania, Sept. 1995, The American Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 152(9), pp1399-1400.
That’s just for starters – the first two I found myself. There are thousands of these that have gone unheeded and been swept under the rug for years. FDA claims no knowledge before 2006 – not true. And the first citation you see there? It’s from NIMH at Bethesda, and references imaging studies. They knew. They ALL knew, and now YOU know. |